The unofficial Shadow Defender Support Thread.

Discussion in 'sandboxing & virtualization' started by Cutting_Edgetech, Feb 14, 2011.

  1. Osaban

    Osaban Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Posts:
    5,616
    Location:
    Milan and Seoul
    My wife uses a very old laptop (13 years old) on her treadmill, which runs on XP SP3 and always in shadow mode. There are no anti malware applications installed, only SD (1.4.0.60:cool:, and she had no problems whatsoever for the last 5 years, although this machine is never used for banking or purchases online...
     
  2. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Just a reminder SD is the best at what it does but it doesn't protect against permanent protection system infection. Remember the commit function and what it does. Best protection it provides is obscurity, not in use enough to be a target.
     
  3. sdmod

    sdmod Shadow Defender Expert

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Posts:
    1,161
    Sorry for the delay in Reply Wendi, I've just noticed your post.

    Yes Wendi, In answer to to your question, I suppose that I do.
    I never run in anything but Shadow Mode these days.
    When in Shadow Mode I'm running Sandboxie for my browsers and Tor client. I also use Keyscrambler Premium . I've lways continued to use anti virus Avast Pro to check downloaded files and Malwarebytes only on demand. I only use 'Commit by Shadow Defender' after checking downloaded files that I want to keep to my real system.
    I suppose that when in Shadow Mode if I inadevertantly allowed/gave access to something malignant it might get to know something, somehow about my real system/network structure but as far as I know, I've never done that. If I feel anything untoward I immediately re-boot to real system. Then go into Shadow Mode again clean.
    I also use Sygate Pro 5.5 Firewall which has served me well over the years. I have lifetime licences for Shadow Defender and Sandboxie but I use versions that suit my needs and system. I don't upgrade software automatically, I like to have the sense of control over my system. I'm not entirely sure how real this is as I have a limited knowledge of the numerous components that make up my system. Rightly or wrongly, I use 'feel' and intuition a lot to gauge if my system is ok. I've not gone with the more modern versions of Windows bacause I don't like to be connected umbilically and automatically and like the sense that I have control about what is coming in and going out from my pc.
    Even with all it's shortcomings I liked Windows 2000 Pro as it seemed to me more businesslike and respectful of users. I use XP sp3 becauseI don't want to have to fight with an operating system that I run about who has the priority rights.

    Patrick


     
    Last edited: Aug 19, 2018
  4. Jo Ann

    Jo Ann Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Posts:
    619
    If you always run in Shadow Mode (for all online disk volumes) without commits or exclusions, then any infection will be completely removed upon the next system startup/restart. Of course there's always potential vulnerability if and when you use SD's commit or exclusion functions!

    The "chink in SD's armor" is that it doesn't protect against information leaks (data/identity theft) during a Shadow Mode session.
     
    Last edited: Aug 19, 2018
  5. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Hi Jo Ann

    I think you missed my point. If you can use "commit" then so could malware. Also there is no telling what a Powershell script could do. The only real protection is not to allow Malware on in the first place. From a security point of view I don't see any point in running in Shadow Mode all the time.
     
  6. Jo Ann

    Jo Ann Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Posts:
    619
    Pete, I'm not sure what it is that I misunderstood and I'm completely confused by your last statement ..."From a security point of view I don't see any point in running in Shadow Mode all the time". As I indicated in my prior post, running in Shadow Mode (no exclusions/commits) does provide absolute protection against system infections.
     
  7. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    My point was, your assumption no commits. If you can commit then potentially so could malware. The only absolute protection is to not let malware on your system
     
  8. Jo Ann

    Jo Ann Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Posts:
    619
    That's a real stretch Pete. ;)
     
    Last edited: Aug 19, 2018
  9. Wendi

    Wendi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Posts:
    643
    Location:
    USA
    @sdmod, thanks for feedback. Concurrent use of SD and SBIE seems redundant to me, but I guess it can't hurt.
     
  10. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    I agree, but do you have any idea what Powershell can do. As long as you know there is a risk then then that is all that matters.
     
  11. EASTER

    EASTER Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Posts:
    11,126
    Location:
    U.S.A. (South)
    That's an interesting statement Pete. In essence take nothing for granted. I will have to study this further. Thanks for the mention.
     
  12. guest

    guest Guest

    Malware only need to launch Cmdtool.exe to commit files/a directory (setting of a password should mitigate it).
    For example:
    Code:
    Commit of a directory:
    CmdTool.exe /commit:"C:\Test"
    
    Commit of a single file:
    CmdTool.exe /commit:"C:\Test\test.txt"
    
     
  13. Azure Phoenix

    Azure Phoenix Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2014
    Posts:
    1,559
    Hasn't there been malware capable of bypassing VMs? If they can do that, then I would guess Shadow Defender would be walk in the park for them
     
  14. Mr.X

    Mr.X Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2013
    Posts:
    4,803
    Location:
    .
    I set NVT ERP to ask when Commit.exe is launched, that is Commit.exe is not whitelisted.
     
  15. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    With Powershell they wouldn't have to use commit. Powershell is nasty. Remember when Black Fog first started, they used Powershell to install, and the reason they did it was if a firewall blocked the install, they could just walk over it.

    Folks look, I don't see it as a big risk, all I am saying is Shadow Defender being on doesn't guarantee your totally safe. Just be aware.
     
  16. EASTER

    EASTER Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Posts:
    11,126
    Location:
    U.S.A. (South)
    It's useful then to Deny/Default Powershell/ISE then. Or at the very least Alerted on the moment when it's engaged even from safe whitelisted processes.
     
  17. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    True enough, but you also need to include system.management.automation.dll. It's somewhere in windows but don't remember where. I have it wildcarded
     
  18. Jo Ann

    Jo Ann Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Posts:
    619
    If you don't use the commit function (I don't), simply delete (or 'Rem') both CmdTool.exe and Commit.exe inside your Shadow Defender folder. Also enable SD's password-protection. ;)
     
  19. EASTER

    EASTER Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Posts:
    11,126
    Location:
    U.S.A. (South)
    :thumb:
     
  20. Jo Ann

    Jo Ann Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Posts:
    619
    With all due respect Pete, if you or anyone else thinks they can create a Powershell script that circumvents Shadow Mode I will eagerly put it to the test and if it does what you suggest can be done I will 'eat crow'. Until then I remain skeptical.
     
  21. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    I doubt if anyone would bother, only because there aren't enough SD people to be profitable
     
  22. TomAZ

    TomAZ Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2010
    Posts:
    1,131
    Location:
    USA
    I should know this, but I can't remember. Exactly how do you REM something??
     
  23. Jo Ann

    Jo Ann Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Posts:
    619
    In that case all of this is strictly academic and not worth any concern...
     
  24. bjm_

    bjm_ Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,457
    Location:
    .
    maybe, Rename....for example ... "CmdTool.exe.old" ... "Commit.exe.old"
     
  25. TomAZ

    TomAZ Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2010
    Posts:
    1,131
    Location:
    USA
    Yep!! As I said, I should have known that, but it's been so long it escaped me. Thank you.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.