The War on Freedom of Speech Continues

Discussion in 'privacy general' started by RockLobster, Aug 7, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. RockLobster

    RockLobster Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    Posts:
    1,812
    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018...pends-libertarian-accounts-including-ron-paul


    https://www.infowars.com/the-war-to-destroy-alex-jones-part-one/
     
  2. mirimir

    mirimir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Posts:
    9,252
    This is getting crazy. I mean, Alex Jones is clearly a troll, profiteering from hate. But from what I can tell, antiwar.com is arguably up to some good stuff. But hey, maybe it's just because I agree with them ;)

    On the other hand, these are all private platforms. And so they get to choose who they publish, and who they don't.
     
  3. ExtremeGamerBR

    ExtremeGamerBR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Posts:
    1,351
    As far as I know, this guy Alex shares several fake news and conspiracy theories.
     
  4. mirimir

    mirimir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Posts:
    9,252
    Most recently, speculation that Michelle Obama is a man. I mean, that's just crazy! It's one thing to say that she has better muscle definition and tone than most men her age. But that's arguably just because she works out far more than most men.

    And sure, with modern medical techniques, any woman could have been born a man. And vice versa. So maybe Alex Jones started out as a woman ;) I mean, "Alex" ;) But the point is that it's meaningless BS. With no other function than generating lulz, and so traffic for his site, and so money.

    And for sure, he has every right to do that. But there's no expectation that Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc should help him do that.
     
  5. RockLobster

    RockLobster Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    Posts:
    1,812
    Why does it matter what he believes or says he believes?
     
  6. mirimir

    mirimir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Posts:
    9,252
    \
    It doesn't. All that matters is that Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc apparently don't want to be associated with him. Just like Wilders doesn't allow political discussion. Owners get to set policies for their sites.

    Also, this isn't about "freedom of speech". The Constitution only guarantees freedom from government censorship and repression. And it also guarantees freedom to Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc to censor, or to refrain from censoring, without government interference.
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2018
  7. RockLobster

    RockLobster Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    Posts:
    1,812
    So you are saying you support the corporate censorship of society?
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2018
  8. mirimir

    mirimir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Posts:
    9,252
    If I had a blog, I would certainly reject attempts by third parties to control the content. And I would undoubtedly nuke any BS from Alex Jones.

    However, I do get that there's an issue when operations on the scale of Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc do that. Because they're so huge that they've effectively replaced the public commons. The answer to that, however, is perhaps for governments to break them up, because they're monopolies. That's been done for newspapers and TV, for example. And yes, I get that there are concerns about that as well, given how corrupt governments have become.

    The best analogy that comes to mind is "freedom of speech" vs "crying fire in a theater". And Alex Jones is pretty clearly "crying fire". And indeed, it may well be that many of these jerks are Russian operatives. And arguably ought to be prosecuted as such. Or maybe we should just enjoy the lulz ;)
     
  9. RockLobster

    RockLobster Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    Posts:
    1,812
    I think it means a lot more than that when these platforms have become part of society because they operate on user submitted content. We are not talking about traditional publications here we are talking about platforms that presented themselves as community projects that everyone could contribute to and they therefore became accepted as a new part of day to day life so there are some moral issues when these platforms then decide to start discriminating against certain people it becomes the corporate censorship of society and I think that is a very bad precedent.
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2018
  10. mirimir

    mirimir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Posts:
    9,252
    Maybe so. Except that they were never really "community projects". Usenet was a community project, and it was damn hard to censor. But Facebook and Twitter are just exploiting user-submitted content to make money. And Google is just exploiting web indexing and search to make money. So yes, there are moral issues.

    On the other hand, trolls can't expect to exploit social media forever without push-back.
     
  11. zapjb

    zapjb Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2005
    Posts:
    5,556
    Location:
    USA still the best. But barely.
    J**** Fr***** C*****t.

    Get rid of & shut down the 10's of thousands of Russian accts. And stop bothering people who don't post racist & other hate filled speech.
     
  12. RockLobster

    RockLobster Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    Posts:
    1,812
    The internet was designed to be global. Why is everyone so frightened of Russian opinion?
     
  13. RockLobster

    RockLobster Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    Posts:
    1,812
    One mans troll is another mans truth seeker.
     
  14. mirimir

    mirimir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Posts:
    9,252
    Normally, I'd agree with you. But Alex Jones is clearly a troll.
     
  15. Joxx

    Joxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Posts:
    1,718
    That's not why he's being banned, it's because he's a male, Caucasian, right wing troll.
     
  16. __Nikopol

    __Nikopol Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2008
    Posts:
    630
    Location:
    Germany
    You ppl realize he repeatedly broke some TOS at most of these sites, yes? :) Also the sites are run by private companies. They can do whatever they want to any content.
    Only when the government is going against someone for his/her opinion it's a breach of free-speech.

    I would happily throw someone out of my house if he repeatedly insults me or anyone I sympathize with, while I am a huge free-speech guy.
     
  17. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    97,885
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    This Conversation is Beyond the Scope of This Forum. Thread Closed as Per Policy.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.