Yes, it seems so. However, unless I'm missing something, it doesn't make much sense these days as no VPN service is using it yet, does it?
I've suggested it to IVPN But no, not that I know of. However, I play with VPNs in many ways. Wireguard works well for private links among VPS. Kinda like internal networks in VirtualBox. So you can replicate just about anything that's doable with VMs, using VPS instead. None of it is private or secure from hosting providers, of course. But there are times when anonymity, and lack of constant local traffic, is more important.
How I made my own WireGuard VPN server WireGuard claims to be faster and more secure than OpenVPN July 28, 2018 https://techcrunch.com/2018/07/28/how-i-made-my-own-wireguard-vpn-server/
Drink this potion, Linux kernel, and tomorrow you'll wake up with a WireGuard VPN driver Secure tunneling tech hopes to move from module to resident August 02, 2018 https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/08/02/linux_kernel_wireguard/
WireGuard VPN review: A new type of VPN offers serious advantages https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/201...ns-amaze-but-windows-support-needs-to-happen/
WireGuard for iOS - TestFlight November 5, 2018 https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2018-November/003526.html
Yep, same for me. Once it is ready, I will try to switch the VPN connection with my Pi-hole from OpenVPN to Wireguard.
Perfect-Privacy's opinion on WireGuard: They say too that some other disadvandages are that Random Outgoing IP, TreackStop and NeuroRouting will not work with WireGuard, but these are concerns specific to PP users. But the "Not usable without logs" is problem for me.
Maybe it's when one has to manage many user accounts, connected as same time, each of them having the choice to connect to the server they want? The PP's argument is that "WireGuard has is no dynamic address management, the client addresses are fixed. That means we would have to register every active device of our customers and assign the static IP addresses on each of our VPN servers. In addition, we would have to store the last login timestamp for each device in order to reclaim unused IP addresses. Our users would then not be able to connect your devices after a few weeks because the addresses would have been reassigned. It is particularly important to us that we do not create or store any connection logs at all. Therefore, we cannot store the above registration and login data that would currently be required for WireGuard to operate.".
I'm sure that can be worked out, without logging anything important. Maybe something as simple as hosts files.
Testing WireGuard with an early-adopter VPN service https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/12/wireguard-gets-a-new-user-friendly-service-provider/
