My experience of linux distros on this underpowered netbook

Discussion in 'all things UNIX' started by ReverseGear, Jan 29, 2018.

  1. ReverseGear

    ReverseGear Guest

    Was lying around at a relative's place so got it to tinker
    Specs of the netbook - Acer Aspire One Happy
    Cpu - Intel atom N455 1.6 ghz
    Ram - 1gb
    Hdd - 320 gb
    Screen - 10.1 inch

    It came with Windows 7 Starter which by default used 450 mb of ram and was lagging quite a bit. Chrome and opera both lagged a lot. Then I tried of lot of linux distros and these are my results

    Linux lite - UI lagged
    Mint mate/cinammon - Same
    Manjaro,Antergos - Both just showed a blank screen with a cursor after installing , although both worked fine in live session
    Zorin os lite - 2nd lightest and easiest to use , but the interface is perhaps too shiny with lots of animations
    Lubuntu,kubuntu - UI lagged
    Xubuntu - The winner. UI is smooth , uses only 150 mb ram when booted , chromium runs a lot smoother than windows and other distros. I havent had to to do anything in terminal to get going.Everything works great, and i could find options easily of things I wanted to do.


    Tried a few os on virtualbox on my pc
    Solus budgie - probably my favourite among all the distros I tried, but this would have lagged a lot on netbook so didn't try
    Debian - the site is extremely confusing and it took me really long to find out what to download from where , and the interface of debian is really ugly
    Opensuse - again ugly
    deepin - meh

    Mint xfce - Working fine in virtualbox , so if I have problems with xubuntu may switch to this

    Mx Linux - Have to try this yet , any other light distros I can try ? With decent UI , no horrible looking distros like puppy please

    Also 1 last question - How do I backup ? With windows I am using Aomie backupper and I can easily switch back to windows with it in a matter of minutes. Anything like this for linux ?
     
  2. Scott W

    Scott W Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Posts:
    659
    Location:
    USA
    @ReverseGear - Am I correct assuming that all of those Linux distros that you tried were 32-bit versions?

    Re your backup question, I may be wrong but I don't think Linux has an equivalent to Windows VSS to support 'hot' system-image backups! (many backup programs can perform a 'cold' image backup of a Linux system).
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2018
  3. lofac

    lofac Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2018
    Posts:
    125
    Location:
    .
    How distros like Debian and Opensuse are ugly when they use other DEs that can be used in most other Linux distros? xfce, gnome, kde etc. ?!

    For backup- there are several free and open source tools for backing up linux systems, one tool that I remember that should suite your needs and has a GUI is fwbackups. You can simply google something like 'linux backup' and you'll get lists of several FOSS software for that task.

    You may also try few other distros that are known to be extremely light for very limited systems, I think Puppy linux can be on top for that, it requires a minimum of 333Mhz processor and 256MB ram. You can also use it from DVD/USB and it loads directly into RAM so it should be very fast.

    Another one that is worth a try is BodhiLinux, which is also very light as it requires minimum of 500mhz processor and 256 ram. It's based on Ubuntu which means you get to use Ubuntu repositories.
     
  4. ReverseGear

    ReverseGear Guest

    @Scott W Yes most of distros have explicit 32 bit versions. Except for manjaro and antergos which had x64-x86 combo iso.

    @lofac Debian and opensuse both have gnome as default which i didn't like. Opensuse anyways has minimum requirements way more than my netbook. Kde was heavy with other distros. Will look at fwbackup or any other I find , Thanx. Puppy I already mentioned has a horrible gui so not gonna try that. Will try bodhi.
     
  5. lofac

    lofac Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2018
    Posts:
    125
    Location:
    .
    Both gnome and kde are considered to be the most resource hungry DEs for linux. Xfce offers a great balance between lightness, visuals, and usability.
    You can always install-uninstall any Desktop environment you want as long as it is supported, like on debian and opensuse you have lots of different DEs to choose from, in other words, you are not forced to use gnome or kde just because they are the defaults on some distros.
     
  6. Scott W

    Scott W Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Posts:
    659
    Location:
    USA
    @ReverseGear, I asked because (as you're likely aware) your netbook's 1GB RAM does not come close to justifying the use of a 64-bit OS (i.e., greater 'system overhead' than a 32-bit OS).

    Btw, if you use your netbook mostly for surfing the net and web-based apps, I suggest taking Peppermint 8 (32-bit) for a spin! :thumb:
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2018
  7. ReverseGear

    ReverseGear Guest

    @lofac Yes I know. Opensuse only has gnome and kde I think. Will try debian again , I had some other problem as well with it I think, apart from the horrible website.
    Thats why I am trying mostly xfce desktops as others were bogging down the netbook.

    @Scott W Yes I know. Yes I am just playing with the netbook as of now and surfing is the only priority. Will try peppermint too thanx.
     
  8. RockLobster

    RockLobster Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    Posts:
    1,812
    If you try debian again use it with xfce it will run fine on that netbook spec.
    I agree Debian's website is a mess as is their documentation.
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2018
  9. lofac

    lofac Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2018
    Posts:
    125
    Location:
    .
    Opensuse has Xfce as well as, MATE, Enlightenment, Cinnamon and LXQt. Opensuse is probably the easier to install a DE on it due it its unique yast, which is a GUI tool to control your system, which also lets you install or uninstall desktop environments with few mouse clicks.
     
  10. Scott W

    Scott W Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Posts:
    659
    Location:
    USA
    @ReverseGear, then I think you will really like Peppermint - please let me know how it goes!
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2018
  11. NormanF

    NormanF Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Posts:
    2,881
    On a netbook, you want a light resource DE like LXDE, XFCE or MATE.

    The main problem is the X86 processor feels underpowered. Quad core X64 processors can be had on Android tablets for little outlay, so it would make more sense to upgrade the hardware than just the OS.
     
  12. Kyle1420

    Kyle1420 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2008
    Posts:
    490
    I have a similar specced netbook, Like you - Xubuntu worked well, As well as Manjaro and Elementary OS.

    If you haven't already, it's worth checking out TLP :)
     
  13. reasonablePrivacy

    reasonablePrivacy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2017
    Posts:
    2,010
    Location:
    Member state of European Union
    Maybe try some Crunchbang-like distributions with Openbox?
     
  14. Stefan Froberg

    Stefan Froberg Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2014
    Posts:
    747
    I have now tried several months lightweight desktop environment called Lumina version 1.3
    (https://lumina-desktop.org/) and been quite happy. It's lighter than LXDE and if I understand right, uses fluxbox as window manager.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.