About to Select & Test some Live Distros

Discussion in 'all things UNIX' started by Scott W, Jan 16, 2018.

  1. Scott W

    Scott W Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Posts:
    659
    Location:
    USA
    I'm finally ready to convert my WinXP Desktop to Linux (yes, I know it's about time!). So I plan to checkout some live (lightweight) distros to see which are more 'Windows-user-friendly'. Would it be correct to assume that if any such live distro performs reasonably well from a USB 2.0 flash drive it will perform even more responsively when installed to HDD?
     
  2. zapjb

    zapjb Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2005
    Posts:
    5,556
    Location:
    USA still the best. But barely.
    99% or more ime you are correct. But I have had wireless & keyboard work in the Live environment & after install not. This is after dozens & dozens of installs.

    I suggest Distrowatch dot com.
     
  3. fblais

    fblais Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Posts:
    1,341
    Location:
    Québec, Canada
    I had the more wireless problems with Debian.
    I suggest Xubuntu. I've installed 17.10.1 two days ago and it works great.
    Installation of the Nvidia driver was a breeze. (I just needed to downgrade from the current driver to an older one because my video card is using an older GPU)
    As a Windows XP user, the switch to the XFCE desktop is easy and intuitive.
    Xubuntu places the panel at the top by default, but you can easily move it to the bottom if you wish. (or to the side as well)
    Good luck!
     
  4. Scott W

    Scott W Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Posts:
    659
    Location:
    USA
    Thanks guys. Since my WinXP desktop has a wired connection to the router, I'm not concerned (at this time) with potential wireless issues.

    @fblais, Xubuntu 17.10 is one of the lightweight distros on my list (btw, on what platform did you install it?). I also plan to checkout Bodhi 4.4, Linux Lite 3.6, LXLE 16.04.3, Peppermint 8, and Zorin Lite 12.2
     
  5. NormanF

    NormanF Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Posts:
    2,879
    If you switch to XFCE or MATE on a Windows XP machine, you can upgrade to the latest browsers and software. You don't have to put up with an increasingly obsolescent Windows OS for which software makers have dropped support. And it will be secure and malware isn't a worry.
     
  6. Scott W

    Scott W Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Posts:
    659
    Location:
    USA
    That's really an excellent point. Based on that consideration, which distros of the those I'm considering (post #4) should I dismiss?
     
  7. NormanF

    NormanF Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Posts:
    2,879
    All are good candidates. You can look at MATE if you want more of a Windows feel. Elementary OS or Enso OS are alternatives if you like Mac OSX.

    Good luck.
     
  8. fblais

    fblais Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Posts:
    1,341
    Location:
    Québec, Canada
    I have an old Compaq with an Intel dual-core CPU and 4 Gigs of RAM.
     
  9. Scott W

    Scott W Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Posts:
    659
    Location:
    USA
    Thanks for the update. It will be interesting to see if Xubuntu runs decently on an even older PC with a Pentium 4 and 2 gigs of RAM. :doubt:
     
    Last edited: Jan 16, 2018
  10. fblais

    fblais Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Posts:
    1,341
    Location:
    Québec, Canada
    Lubuntu is even lighter, with its openbox window manager, but Xubuntu feels very light on old machines IMO.
     
  11. sbwhiteman

    sbwhiteman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2009
    Posts:
    88
    You might find Linux Mint XFCE to be a bit more user friendly, but just as light as, Xubuntu.
     
  12. Scott W

    Scott W Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Posts:
    659
    Location:
    USA
    It seems that Mint XFCE 17.1 is recommended (over 18.3) to replace XP on older PCs! Unfortunately, 17.1 will only receive security updates until 2019. :gack:
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2018
  13. Joxx

    Joxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Posts:
    1,718
    Link please.
     
  14. Scott W

    Scott W Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Posts:
    659
    Location:
    USA
    @Joxx, that is discussed (in more depth) here.
     
  15. fblais

    fblais Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Posts:
    1,341
    Location:
    Québec, Canada
    That doesn't mean 18.3 wouldn't run well on *your* machine.
    You can try it with a live session.
    If you have unsupported hardware, you should be able to find out fast.
     
  16. Joxx

    Joxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Posts:
    1,718
    Right. As fblais said try a live session to check hardware compatibility.
    Mint 18.3 or the recent MX-17, if these are overweight for your PC then it's time for the dust bin.
     
  17. Scott W

    Scott W Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Posts:
    659
    Location:
    USA
    Okay guys, I'll give them a look as well.
     
  18. sbwhiteman

    sbwhiteman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2009
    Posts:
    88
    Over the years I have had customers with meager finances who preferred not to buy a new machine when Microsoft ended support for XP or Vista. To be able to offer them something more affordable I have tested most of the lightweight Linux distributions that are commonly recommended. I found that the few that are (slightly) lighter than Mint XFCE -- like, say, Puppy -- are also too wonky for non-geeks. So I agree with Joxx: if Mint XFCE 18.3 won't run acceptably on your machine, it's probably time to retire it. You can get a refurbished Core 2 Duo-based box that will perform all everyday tasks quite well for very little money.
     
  19. Scott W

    Scott W Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Posts:
    659
    Location:
    USA
    In my case it's not that clear-cut. My XP desktop has several working peripherals (2 printers, film-scanner, external speakers, etc.) all of which are in fine physical condition (as is the XP desktop itself). Every one of those devices are from the 'XP era' and therefore came with XP drivers. So a major factor when I'm checking out Linux distros is to determine whether or not they can support those devices. Retiring my XP desktop would likely mean having to also retire all of those (working) peripherals!
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2018
  20. zapjb

    zapjb Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2005
    Posts:
    5,556
    Location:
    USA still the best. But barely.
    It's difficult, frustrating & very time consuming. But if you can't for whatever reason pickup a cheap $30-$75 C2D tower or complete system. Odds are good of the hundreds of Linux Distros (some older versions as well) that some will support obsolete XP peripheral hardware like printers etc. Once a particular Distro is found that works with one or more peripherals. Then these can be multi-booted to a specific Distro when a working piece of hardware is needed.
     
  21. NormanF

    NormanF Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Posts:
    2,879
    I second it - you can find a refurbished dual core Intel or AMD PC on eBay for between $60-$200. It won't be the latest and greatest but an x64 PC should be able to run Windows 10 or any modern Linux distro you want. You're not just confined to an x86 OS. Something to think about for the future.
     
  22. fblais

    fblais Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Posts:
    1,341
    Location:
    Québec, Canada
    I got mine from Staples a couple of years ago for about $100.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.