Basilisk Browser

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by guest, Nov 17, 2017.

  1. guest

    guest Guest

    Website
    Download
    Main features:
    • Full support for JavaScript's ECMAscript 6 standard for modern web browsing.
    • Support for all NPAPI plugins (Unity, Flash, Java, authentication plugins, etc.).
    • Support for XUL/Overlay Mozilla-style extensions.
    • Experimental support for WebExtensions (in gecko-target mode). Please note that some Mozilla-specific WebExtension APIs are not yet available.
    • Support for ALSA on Linux.
    • Support for WebAssembly (WASM).
    • Support for advanced Graphite font shaping features.
    • Support for modern web cryptography: up to TLS 1.3, modern ciphers, HSTS, etc.
    Important: "Basilisk is development software. This means that it should be considered more or less "beta" at all times"
     
  2. guest

    guest Guest

    Pale Moon team releases first version of Basilisk browser
    https://www.ghacks.net/2017/11/17/pale-moon-team-releases-first-version-of-basilisk-browser/
     
  3. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,559
    Location:
    The Netherlands
  4. The Red Moon

    The Red Moon Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2012
    Posts:
    4,101
    Basilisk is a platform and thus is a browser in a constant state of progress and in beta.
     
  5. guest

    guest Guest

    They are still two different projects (Basilisk / PaleMoon):
    Maybe PaleMoon switches to this platfom in the future, who knows:
     
  6. ance

    ance formerly: fmon

    Joined:
    May 5, 2013
    Posts:
    1,359
    Very nice, it is as secure as FF 57? :eek:
     
  7. guest

    guest Guest

    Basilisk is an application and builds on the platform (UXP):
    rough-layout-of-mozilla-based-applications.png
     
  8. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Posts:
    17,559
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    It's a bit confusing, but if it will help Pale Moon to become just as fast as FF 57 then it's a good thing.
     
  9. guest

    guest Guest

    Basilisk Browser v2017.12.01 (December 01, 2017)
    Download
    Release Notes
     
  10. summerheat

    summerheat Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2015
    Posts:
    2,199
    No, certainly not:
    1. No Servo, no Rust.
    2. No multiprocessing i.e. no sandboxing and no process separation.
    3. No webextensions (legacy add-ons are much more insecure)

    I wouldn't use it.
     
  11. guest

    guest Guest

    There is (experimental) support for Webextensions.
     
  12. guest

    guest Guest

    Basilisk Browser v2017.12.28 (December 28, 2017)
    Download
    Release Notes
     
  13. guest

    guest Guest

    Basilisk Browser v2018.01.05 (January 1, 2018)
    Download
    Release Notes
    "Meltdown"/"Spectre" and Pale Moon/Basilisk
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 5, 2018
  14. NormanF

    NormanF Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Posts:
    2,882
    The Pale Moon team came out with a fork of the Australis FF browser, to allow users to keep
    running native FF extensions even after FF moves with 57+ to the new Web Extensions. It uses the same Goanna engine that powers Pale Moon. If you don't want to give up the customizability of FF, Basilisk looks like the ticket.
     
  15. NormanF

    NormanF Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    Posts:
    2,882
    Its old-fashioned. The Pale Moon team's philosophy is simple: if it ain't broke don't fix it, or rather fix all the bugs Mozilla hasn't bothered to patch and just make a good browser even better. I see Mozilla's constant change for the mere sake of change pointless and FWIW, I've never had a problem with the legacy extensions - the kind Mozilla dumped at great cost to how users like to do things. I just hate having to constantly update my browser.
     
  16. IvoShoen

    IvoShoen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Posts:
    849
    I have been testing this for a few days and like it a lot so far. It seems like it renders Netflix and Amazon videos a bit better than Firefox.
     
  17. guest

    guest Guest

    Basilisk Browser v2018.02.02 (February 2, 2018)
    Download
    Release Notes
     
  18. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    5,933
  19. ArchiveX

    ArchiveX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2014
    Posts:
    1,501
    Location:
    .
  20. The Red Moon

    The Red Moon Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2012
    Posts:
    4,101
  21. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    5,933
    based on v55 they used its a dead end - too simple?
     
  22. Joxx

    Joxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Posts:
    1,718
    The way I understand this: they found insurmountable compatibility issues when based on version 55 and decided to start from scratch with version 52.
    Is this a positive or negative development? I'm not sure.
    But at least they stick with their vision of a XUL platform ...
    ... and they're not afraid of hard work.
    Myself I'm sticking with Palemoon as my browser and future will tell.
     
  23. ArchiveX

    ArchiveX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2014
    Posts:
    1,501
    Location:
    .
    :rolleyes:
    :argh:
     
    Last edited: Feb 6, 2018
  24. guest

    guest Guest

    Basilisk Browser v2018.02.14 (February 15, 2018)
    Download
    Release Notes
     
  25. The Red Moon

    The Red Moon Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2012
    Posts:
    4,101
    Do you not remember when browsers first came out and they had none of this fancy stuff but we used them effectively.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.