New Roguekiller version

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by boredog, May 23, 2017.

  1. boredog

    boredog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Posts:
    2,499
  2. EASTER

    EASTER Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Posts:
    11,126
    Location:
    U.S.A. (South)
    Ok boredog, what's the advice you have on this one? Have you tested it at all?

    Felt it only right someone post a reply to new Topic Title.

    There's something to be said for users who tried and like it but it also sends a message with their silence :cool:
     
  3. boredog

    boredog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Posts:
    2,499
    Hi EASTER

    This new version still detects the same Marcuim Reflect file I am going to run it again and post all the stuff it found on my computer. Running all versions seems to take quit awhile on my system. I downloaded the portable version.
     
  4. EASTER

    EASTER Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Posts:
    11,126
    Location:
    U.S.A. (South)
    Thanks boredog.

    That's how I am about those programs. If it is a portable all the better.

    Look forward to your details later.
     
  5. boredog

    boredog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Posts:
    2,499
    Ran it again left to do some errands and computer had rebooted. Just ran again so I could watch and here is the detections.

    ¤¤¤ Registry : 6 ¤¤¤
    [PUP.Gen1] (X64) HKEY_USERS\S-1-5-21-3438962753-3298352509-1694371991-1001\Software\AppDataLow\Software\adawarebp -> Found
    [PUP.Gen1] (X86) HKEY_USERS\S-1-5-21-3438962753-3298352509-1694371991-1001\Software\AppDataLow\Software\adawarebp -> Found
    [PUM.Dns] (X64) HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\ControlSet001\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\Interfaces\{d3199732-475b-42df-be3b-f420052d1fc3} | NameServer : 10.4.0.1 ([]) -> Found
    [PUM.Dns] (X64) HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\ControlSet001\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\Interfaces\{d3199732-475b-42df-be3b-f420052d1fc3} | DhcpNameServer : 10.4.0.1 ([]) -> Found
    [PUM.StartMenu] (X64) HKEY_USERS\S-1-5-21-3438962753-3298352509-1694371991-1001\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Advanced | Start_TrackProgs : 0 -> Found
    [PUM.StartMenu] (X86) HKEY_USERS\S-1-5-21-3438962753-3298352509-1694371991-1001\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Advanced | Start_TrackProgs : 0 -> Found
    ¤¤¤ Tasks : 0 ¤¤¤
    ¤¤¤ Files : 1 ¤¤¤
    [PUP.AutoIt.Gen][File] C:\Program Files\Macrium\Reflect\reflectbin.exe -> Found
     
  6. EASTER

    EASTER Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Posts:
    11,126
    Location:
    U.S.A. (South)
    PuP? LoL

    I always wondered why some scanner apps don't first run through an updated list of commonly known and accepted programs like this.
     
  7. boredog

    boredog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Posts:
    2,499
    That is why I ran it in Shadow mode.;)
    Might try contacting them about this marcuim one.

    EDIT: sent message to them.
     
  8. boredog

    boredog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Posts:
    2,499
    This is the reply I got from support.

    "RogueKiller detects Macrium Reflect executanle because it was written using the AutoIt scripting language and packed with UPX.
    Since malware writers often use thoses, we hardened the detection of such packers and flagged them as PUP (Potentially Unwanted Program)."
     
  9. EASTER

    EASTER Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Posts:
    11,126
    Location:
    U.S.A. (South)
    I guess that makes some sense. Seems they respond fairly prompt too.
     
  10. NiteRanger

    NiteRanger Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2016
    Posts:
    651
    Location:
    Far East
    Hi

    How does Rougekiller compares to AdwCleaner and Ultra Adware Killer?

    Thanks in advance
     
    Last edited: May 26, 2017
  11. B-boy/StyLe/

    B-boy/StyLe/ Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Posts:
    518
    Location:
    Bulgaria
    You can't really compare them because RogueKiller scan for all type of malware and AdwCleaner is mainly for PUPS/PUMS. For PUPS/PUMS adwcleaner is a lot more powerful but it is definitions based and can miss something. RogueKiller uses definitions as well but it have a generic engine too (it can scan the malware loading points and can detect new threats even without definitions but it can give some false positives as well - it is up to the user to decide how to proceed - to delete the entries found or not and this make the tool for experienced users only). If you are confident while using RogueKiller then you can keep both tools, otherwise stick to AdwCleaner.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.