VoodooShield/Cyberlock

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by CloneRanger, Dec 7, 2011.

  1. VoodooShield

    VoodooShield Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Posts:
    5,881
    Location:
    United States
    Cool, thank you! I tried GU, and it seemed to work great for me, but please let me know if you have any other issues!
     
  2. VoodooShield

    VoodooShield Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Posts:
    5,881
    Location:
    United States
    Very cool, thank you Krusty!

    BTW, there is a new RanSim out that tests for even more types of ransomware.

    If you test VS, make sure to disable the Parent Process Feature and the Digital Signature feature ;). And you need to allow the initial Launcher.exe file that VS blocks, otherwise none of the tests will run.

    https://s3.amazonaws.com/ransim/downloads/RanSimSetup.exe

    BTW... it took about 7 minutes to run when testing with VS... but it blocked all 10.
     
  3. VoodooShield

    VoodooShield Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Posts:
    5,881
    Location:
    United States
    Very cool to know, thank you Paul!
     
  4. VecchioScarpone

    VecchioScarpone Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2015
    Posts:
    343
    Location:
    Down Under the Southern Cross
    Sure.

    Running VS 3.49 now. Did some uninstalling of few old software versions, reinstalled the update versions. Installed a couple of new software. All sweet...
    (BTW Running VS along side with MBAE and CryptoPrevent)

    Cheers
     
  5. Djigi

    Djigi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2012
    Posts:
    554
    Location:
    Croatia
    I do not understand why the VS in the Auto-Pilot Mode gives warning when installing Google Chrome?

    Clipboard01.jpg Clipboard02.jpg Clipboard03.jpg

    If you want to enable easy use for less experienced users think that things like this should not occur.
     
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2016
  6. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Actually for now I've dropped AG. Just to much of a pain on my No. 1 desktop. The testing I am doing in the VM has been in Autopilot, but on the desktop I am using ON. It bothers me seeing it toggle on and off, but I understand and agree with Dan's reasons for the average user.

    Pete
     
  7. Djigi

    Djigi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2012
    Posts:
    554
    Location:
    Croatia
  8. guest

    guest Guest

    v1.10 it will have premium features.
    But it's a long way to 1.10, so there is enough time to decide :)
    You had a similar situation some time ago: #11543 but with a Ai-Score of 0.000
    It seems that a prompt is always displayed if a file is unknown, independently of the Ai-score.
     
  9. NSG001

    NSG001 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2006
    Posts:
    682
    Location:
    Wembley, London
  10. EvjlsRain

    EvjlsRain Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2016
    Posts:
    31
    I notice that the previously whitelisted applications are now not allowed to run freely anymore. It shows prompts every single app that I allowed before. I reset the whitelist and started everything again
     
  11. Djigi

    Djigi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2012
    Posts:
    554
    Location:
    Croatia
    This is not problem for me (i will allow it) but if they want easy use for less experienced users, my thinking is, things like this should not show in Auto-Pilot mode for known apps.
     
  12. VoodooShield

    VoodooShield Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Posts:
    5,881
    Location:
    United States
    Very cool, this is a great example of a worst case scenario… let me tell you what I think, and then please tell me what you think, and if we need to make changes, let’s certainly do.

    First, this is an unknown file… so it must be the absolute latest Chrome installer. Your question is “I do not understand why the VS in the Auto-Pilot Mode gives warning when installing Google Chrome?”, which if I am reading into your question correctly, I am assuming that you are suggesting that since this file is a file from Google, you are perplexed as to why this file was blocked. Keep in mind, this is a brand new, unknown file, that is not yet in the blacklist database, so it is completely irrelevant that this file is a common file distributed by a tech giant… the reality is, it is an unknown file, so it should be blocked until it is a known file… which will happen quickly since it is a common file from a tech giant.

    And please keep in mind, in all fairness, I believe the prompt explains correctly what user actions should take for this particular block, and most likely, a novice would read the prompt to fully understand why the file was blocked. At that point, if they knew that they were trying to install the latest version of Chrome, they would click allow, which is the correct response for that scenario. If they were not trying to install the latest version of Chrome, they would click block, which is also the correct response for that scenario. Then in a day or so, when the file is known to the blacklist, when Chrome tries to update itself again, the user will be presented with a blue prompt that fully recommends that they allow the file.

    Keep in mind… not every single file needs to run on every endpoint. To me, ALL unknown files should ALWAYS be blocked… it is not the end of the world if an unknown file is blocked. ;)

    Sure, we could easily add an option to allow by digital signature for the top 100 or so software distributors, which would alleviate this situation, but I do not believe this is safe to do so.

    This is a very tricky scenario, but I believe that VS handled it correctly, but if you have some ideas on how we can optimize the prompt for the unknown file situation, please let me know! Thank you!
     
  13. VoodooShield

    VoodooShield Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Posts:
    5,881
    Location:
    United States
  14. VoodooShield

    VoodooShield Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Posts:
    5,881
    Location:
    United States
    Yeah, exactly, thank you mood. In a few months, once VoodooAi 2.0's accuracy is a little more "road tested" and proven, we should be able to auto allow files, if for example, the VoodooAi score is less than 0.2500.

    And actually, now that I think about it... what we might be able to do is if the file signed by a tech giant AND it has a super low Ai score, then we should be able to allow the file, even if it is unknown. This is what I mean by adding usability features to VS as we go... I think something like this would be great to add. But we need to give VoodooAi 2.0 a little more time... I still need to do a little optimizing since it is so new. For example, I think the thresholds are pretty close, but we might be able to tweak them a little more.
     
  15. VoodooShield

    VoodooShield Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Posts:
    5,881
    Location:
    United States
    Hmmm, that is odd... what is VS blocking? Can you please give me more details? Thank you!
     
  16. VoodooShield

    VoodooShield Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Posts:
    5,881
    Location:
    United States
    Yeah, exactly... and also if it is signed by 100 or so of the top software distributors, something like that? Thank you!
     
  17. NSG001

    NSG001 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2006
    Posts:
    682
    Location:
    Wembley, London
  18. VoodooShield

    VoodooShield Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Posts:
    5,881
    Location:
    United States
    I see what you are saying, and that certainly makes sense to me... we have time to think about it while we refine VoodooAi 2.0 a little more over the next couple of months. Either way, we want to be absolutely safe, and if that means that we are required to block unknown files from time to time, then I am ok with that ;). Thank you!
     
  19. Djigi

    Djigi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2012
    Posts:
    554
    Location:
    Croatia
    T
    This is legit download from google and try to install Chrome x64.
    It's not so new version so it should be already in database.
    Lets asume VS check 3 things:
    Signature
    Vir. Total
    Ai

    If 2/3 (66%) are safe then maybe it should be Allowed.
    What use is of Ai if his score is Clean but final recommendation is Block?
     
  20. VoodooShield

    VoodooShield Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Posts:
    5,881
    Location:
    United States
    Yeah, I totally agree, there are a lot of little tweaks we can do over the next couple of months that will be really cool... everyone, please keep the ideas coming!!!
     
  21. EvjlsRain

    EvjlsRain Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2016
    Posts:
    31
    sorry for my bad explanation. I mean the previously whitelisted apps are not read by Voodooshield after the update from 3.48. The whitelist is there, the app is in the whitelist but voodooshield still shows a prompt to allow/deny the app that I use everyday (1/56 on VT). After I allowed it, it could run without prompt the next times. I use autopilot mode

    I decided to empty the whitelist (the whitelist is not read by VS, no point to keep it) and now everything is working fine
     
  22. VoodooShield

    VoodooShield Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Posts:
    5,881
    Location:
    United States
    I definitely see what you are saying... maybe we can do something like this... https://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/voodooshield.313706/page-539#post-2641148

    Keep in mind, even if it the file is blocked, Ai is still an extremely useful file insight feature for the end user ;). To me, file insight is absolutely critical... it is best to provide as a much information to the end user, so they can make the correct decision, in the event of a block.
     
  23. VoodooShield

    VoodooShield Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Posts:
    5,881
    Location:
    United States
    Thank you for letting me know... I better test this so that users who upgrade to the newest version do not experience this ;).
     
  24. VoodooShield

    VoodooShield Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Posts:
    5,881
    Location:
    United States
    Very cool, thank you Kees, these are all great ideas! After 3.50 is released in a few days, we can wait a month or so before adding new features, just to make sure all of the bugs are completely worked out, then I will get to work on my "Kees to do list" ;).
     
  25. Cache

    Cache Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2016
    Posts:
    445
    Location:
    Mercia
    @VoodooShield
    Hi Dan This might not be a top priority but towards the end of October there was a discussion about the the GUI and the meaning of OFF in the various modes (Training mode OFF = truly off whereas OFF in Smart and Aways On = Unlocked).

    You very nicely clarified how VS operates in these various modes but it was left in the air about whether you felt any changes were necessary. It may well be that this is in hand but if it has slipped under the radar I hope you don't mind my "bumping" it up for you attention.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.