Malwarebytes Anti-Malware

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by jpcummins, Mar 23, 2015.

  1. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Posts:
    6,220
    Location:
    USA
    The new build appears to work fine. I can confirm that Hyper Scan no longer scans for rootkits; Threat Scan must be used.
     
  2. anon

    anon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Posts:
    8,009
    Not yet....... :thumbd:
     
  3. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Posts:
    6,220
    Location:
    USA
    Regarding removal of the option to scan for rootkits during Hyper Scan we have this explanation from the MBAM production team:

    "Unfortunately that setting was never properly removed or disabled in Hyper Scans so it was possible to incorrectly configure Hyper Scans to include a rootkit scan up until 2.1.7. We corrected it because technically, if a rootkit was ever discovered then a full file system scan would also be necessary to ensure we can detect and clean the rootkit properly. This file system scan is NOT a default part of Hyper Scan. And while we could add an option for a full file system scan to Hyper Scan, that would add even more time to the total scan time, thus further defeating the entire purpose of Hyper.

    But it absolutely should NOT have been.

    Honestly, users could have found themselves in a bad situation because there are some cases where if we detected a rootkit during a Hyper scan and it was NOT followed up appropriately with a full file system scan, then that could have had caused severe problems on the system. so while it may have seemed like the rootkit scan was running just fine, and in the majority of cases it was, this has the potential for undesirable results.

    So really, should never been allowed from the beginning."


    http://www.sevenforums.com/system-security/240099-latest-version-malwarebytes-98.html
     
  4. wshrugged

    wshrugged Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    Posts:
    266
  5. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Posts:
    6,220
    Location:
    USA
  6. 1PW

    1PW Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Posts:
    1,938
    Location:
    North of the 38th parallel.
    Thank you kindly @Victek

    The 2.1.7.1055 to 2.1.8.1057 difference is:
    Cheers
     
  7. hayc59

    hayc59 Updates Team

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    2,841
    Location:
    KEEP USA GREAT
    thank you!!
     
  8. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Posts:
    6,220
    Location:
    USA
    Thanks, I was wondering what the dif was between .7 and .8 :thumb:
     
  9. anon

    anon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Posts:
    8,009
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2015
  10. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,241
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
    That sounds familiar... cough, Norton, cough.
     
  11. niki

    niki Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2010
    Posts:
    365
    http://www.xpatch.de/meldungen.asp
     
  12. kantry123

    kantry123 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2015
    Posts:
    22
    i didn't get any internal Update
    can u show us a screenshot?

    regards
     
  13. anon

    anon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Posts:
    8,009
  14. Hadron

    Hadron Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Posts:
    2,145
    I work with removing malware daily, and Malwarebytes Anti-Malware has become almost useless. I can't believe how far it has fallen. It used to be a great tool.
    It finds mostly harmless PUPs now. No wonder they're purchasing something more useful.
     
    Last edited: Jun 20, 2015
  15. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Posts:
    6,220
    Location:
    USA
    Here is a screenshot of a Hyper Scan being done in 2.1.8 Note the absence of the rootkit phase even though "scan for rootkits" is enabled in the Detection and Protection settings. The update/patch is being rolled out gradually.

    MalwareBytes Hyper Scan.jpg
     
  16. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Posts:
    6,220
    Location:
    USA
    Can you be more specific? What are you using that is finding malware being missed by MBAM? I remove malware regularly as well and often use both Hitman Pro and MBAM. I find that they often detect the same serious malware (not the same PUPs necessarily). I would add that PUPs are not harmless; they often cripple performance.
     
  17. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Posts:
    6,220
    Location:
    USA
  18. kantry123

    kantry123 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2015
    Posts:
    22
    also for the internal update do we have to be premium?

    regards
     
  19. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Posts:
    6,220
    Location:
    USA
    I have premium installed on all of my PCs so I can't test the free version, sorry.
     
  20. kantry123

    kantry123 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2015
    Posts:
    22
    LoL no issues!!!!
    Not a force will do that myself ...i was just curious to know
    thanks a ton
    regards
     
  21. Hadron

    Hadron Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Posts:
    2,145
    AdwCleaner & Junkware Removal Tool (JRT) often find serious stuff where MBAM only found PUPs.
    By the way. I always look through all findings before taking any action, and I am yet to see a PUP found by MBAM that is worth worrying about.

    Yes, I have read that the JRT developer, Thisisu has just been hired by Malwarebytes and they also bought the program, so maybe Malwarebytes may make up the ground they lost over the last few years.
     
    Last edited: Jun 21, 2015
  22. RubbeR DuckY

    RubbeR DuckY Developer

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2006
    Posts:
    227
    Just to clear up the updating process for us. Our users have NOT become guinea pigs, let me make that clear. We are simply testing our update throttling system. Why? Because when we push an update out, 5 million computer pick it up within the first hour. Hypothetically speaking, if we ever had a bug in the software that was severe, we certainly would not want to let it propagate that far, that fast.

    We are pushing out updates from 2.1.6 and older to 2.1.8 at a capped rate of 100,000 per hour and we're disabling it at night when our support team has hit the hay. By the end of the week, we should be opening it even wider.

    2.1.7 is no longer being served due to an issue with a crash on scanning a few specific pieces of software. It made it to 50,000 users and we had 10 reports. More importantly, it never showed up in 4 weeks of testing. Now you know why we throttle :)
     
  23. anon

    anon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Posts:
    8,009
    "Malwarebytes Anti-Malware (MBAM) v2.1.7.1055 has been released 16-June-2015"

    "We are pushing out updates from 2.1.6 and older to 2.1.8 at a capped rate of 100,000 per hour"

    Today is June 24 and I'm still in 2.1.6 Premium version.

    June 24 - June 16 = 8 days.
    100.000 per hour x 24 hours = 2.400.000 per day
    8 days x 2.400.000 per day = 19.200.000 customers

    Question: How many customers (paid version, not the free one) do you have?
     
  24. RubbeR DuckY

    RubbeR DuckY Developer

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2006
    Posts:
    227
    2.1.7 was released June 16th but was taken down for 3 days. We've only been pushing out 2.1.8 since the 19th (4 days!) and at a much more limited number than 100,000 per hour.

    As of this message, the upgrades are off for the evening. We migrated about 500,000 users today, free and paid.

    If you'd like the latest build, you can message me for a link. We'll be much more comfortable by the end of the week pushing the new version out fully, it is showing to be very stable.
     
  25. anon

    anon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Posts:
    8,009
    I see, thanks for the reply/clarification/link.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.