HitmanPro.ALERT Support and Discussion Thread

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by erikloman, May 25, 2012.

  1. brihy1

    brihy1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Posts:
    199
    Location:
    usa
    I had the same problem with chrome not loading with wsa and hmpa.Never did get it work?I tried everything,allowing hmpa inside of wsa but didnt work?Only setting chrome to allow inside wsa worked but i wasnt going to go with that setting.
    https://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/hitmanpro-alert-support-and-discussion-thread.324841/page-151

     
  2. paulderdash

    paulderdash Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2013
    Posts:
    4,644
    Location:
    Under a bushel ...
    Thanks brihy1 ... so I am not alone. And the issue remains.

    Edit: Please ignore my point 2. The flyout indeed does occur on boot; my Chrome seems to load on boot.
     
  3. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Posts:
    6,219
    Location:
    USA
    I'm not running Chrome so can't say for sure, but have you checked the other sections of WSA? Applications can be blocked/monitored in the PC Security section, and also the Active Processes list in Utilities/System Control/Start. Every time I update HMPA I go through these sections plus the Identity Protection section to make sure WSA is not interfering with it.
     
  4. paulderdash

    paulderdash Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2013
    Posts:
    4,644
    Location:
    Under a bushel ...
    Yes I have, Victek. hmpalert.exe (2 instances) are 'Allowed' in Active Processes list in Utilities/System Control/Start, and I am unable to add hmpalert.exe in the PC Security block/allow section.
     
  5. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Posts:
    6,219
    Location:
    USA
    I just installed Chrome and can open and close it without problems. All mitigations are enabled for Chrome in HMPA 171 RC. Chrome is protected in WSA Identity Protection and allowed in the Active Processes list.
     
  6. paulderdash

    paulderdash Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2013
    Posts:
    4,644
    Location:
    Under a bushel ...
    And in Identity Protection/Application Protection is Chrome.exe set to 'Allow' or 'Protect'? I have to set all instance of chrome.exe to 'Allow' before Chrome will open. I would prefer this to not be the case. Is yours set to 'Protect'? If so, there must be some other software interfering with Chrome on my system.

    I have MBAE Free (uninstalling this before made no difference), MBAM Premium, CryptoPrevent, Spywareblaster, VoodooShield, WinPatrol, WinPrivacy Explorer ...
     
  7. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Posts:
    6,219
    Location:
    USA
    Yes, Chrome is set to "protect" in Identity Protection. I also run MBAM Premium (real time enabled) and use CryptoPrevent (default protection level). I wouldn't think WinPatrol or Sypwareblaster would interfere, but don't know about the others.
     
  8. brihy1

    brihy1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Posts:
    199
    Location:
    usa
    This problem with chrome not connecting with hmpa & wsa happened on both my hp 64 laptops so its not just 1 of my computers.
     
  9. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Posts:
    6,219
    Location:
    USA
    Did you try turning off VoodooShield?
     
  10. brihy1

    brihy1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Posts:
    199
    Location:
    usa
    I dont have voodooshield

     
  11. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Posts:
    6,219
    Location:
    USA
    Ah, my mistake; I was looking at Paulderdash's list of security apps.
     
  12. Beta for half a year now, still many reported problems . . . may be to over ambitious on features in first release?

    Loman brothers are long enough in IT to recognise an IT-project with structural problems: they are 90% ready during 90% of the time.

    My advise: take a look at the ten principle's of Google before you go into the next team meeting, drop problematic features.
     
  13. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Posts:
    6,219
    Location:
    USA
    Personally I think what is needed is to narrow the list of apps that HMPA is officially compatible with. I think Erik is working too hard trying to make HMPA compatible with overly complicated and dubious configurations of security applications. The recent HMPA release candidates have worked perfectly for me.
     
  14. paulderdash

    paulderdash Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2013
    Posts:
    4,644
    Location:
    Under a bushel ...
    Will try that, and turning off other apps.

    There is some problem in WSA though. In Identity Protection/Application Protection, I have to add and 'Allow' either, or both c:\users\paul\appdata\local\google\chrome\application\chrome.exe /
    c:\portableapps.com\portableapps\googlechromeportable\app\chrome-bin\chrome.exe in order for either the normal or portable Chrome to work. But it adds the corresponding entry as an e:\ ... entry in either case. I really cannot explain this, but it is a WSA issue.
     
  15. test

    test Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Posts:
    499
    Location:
    italy
    +1

    In a clean system (8.1) it works like a charm and for the masses is enough to ensure compatibility with the most popular antivirus...
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2015
  16. PallMall

    PallMall Guest

    +1 here as well, even if I haven't followed the thread since it's start. HitmanPro.Alert 3.0.30.172 running just fine but I have no possible security software compatibility in view; other than that I do have an issue with xmplay.exe, an audio player (Control-Flow Integrity, ROP attack) and disabling that mitigation for the player resolves the issue.

    I believe there is already far enough work to deal with non-security programs that could possibly serve a false-positive.
     
  17. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    I agree about the compatibility. I would try to support working with EMET or MBAE. To me like having two active scanning AV's
     
  18. test

    test Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Posts:
    499
    Location:
    italy
    I think that two similar products should not be installed on the same system as well as 2 AVs and so on...
     
  19. brihy1

    brihy1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Posts:
    199
    Location:
    usa
    Ive been running emsisoft along with hmpa since uninstalling wsa and have had no problems with the 2 running together.
     
  20. PallMall

    PallMall Guest

    I think so as well. Of course similar products may have their own specificity hence the wish of some to use them all but working on the same ground compatibility issues are more likely to arise. I think choosing is an option, a valid one sometimes. HitmanPro.Alert is a powerful tool, able to handle many intrusions. Make it HMP.Alert and one anti-virus as far as security monitoring is concerned, plus extras which can absolutely not interfere with either and the system will breath. But that's only an opinion, I could be mistaking in that, in certain circumstances, with particular threats, adding two similar security applications could be more beneficial than cumbersome : I just don't know for sure and, in doubt, rely on good sense.
     
  21. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Posts:
    10,240
    Location:
    Among the gum trees
    I had something strange with both of my systems this morning with HMP.A using around 30% CPU continuously. In this time the Tray icon was unresponsive but the fly-out still showed when I opened Firefox. Task Manager showed it was HMP.A that was the culprit.

    Restarting both machines solved the problem but it was quite odd that both of my machines were affected at the same time, especially when I haven't seen this on either machine before.

    @erikloman , is there a log I can find that will help diagnose this?

    Thanks
     
  22. Gandalf_The_Grey

    Gandalf_The_Grey Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Posts:
    1,188
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    On the latest Windows 10 TP build 10041 with HitmanPro.Alert build 172 the latest stable Google Chrome version 41.0.2272.101 crashes. The problem goes away when I disable the Load Library or the Enforce DEP migration. What is the safest one to disable?
     
  23. deugniet

    deugniet Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2013
    Posts:
    1,243
    Same as you Krusty: around 40% cpu continuously (W7 64 bits/build 172/Norton Security 2105). Using latest Processexplorer. CPU.jpg
     
  24. clubhouse1

    clubhouse1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2013
    Posts:
    1,124
    Location:
    UK
    Careful if you tend to re-install for any reason....I received this e-mail..

    HitmanPro is not compatible with frequent reinstalls.
    Please confirm that you want me to do this one-time complete reset of your key.
    Best regards,
    Lisa
    HitmanPro Support
    Want to see HitmanPro.Alert 3.0 in action? Watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrSP-CMjuFk
     
  25. erikloman

    erikloman Developer

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2009
    Posts:
    3,152
    Location:
    Hengelo, The Netherlands
    No need to cross post. Most Wilders members know that they should contact me to resolve reinstall issues as you guys are not the average computer users.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.