CleanMem experimentation

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by Gullible Jones, Dec 26, 2014.

  1. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Well what made me try it is using some of the other utilities written by this "random guy" and how well those worked. I am also running Cleanmem and find it very useful.
     
  2. Mayahana

    Mayahana Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2014
    Posts:
    2,220
    It's funny. We use Shane's 'Tweaking.com' utility on upwards of 1000 machines a month. It does a whole lot of things I would have to do manually. I agree with you on this.

    Shane has worked with me in the MSP field, and I have consulted him numerous times on 'very odd' issues a dozen engineers can't solve. I respect him, and I was the one that invited him to this forum.

    Hopefully he can be accorded an Orange Name.
     
  3. Night_Raven

    Night_Raven Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Posts:
    388
    Just because someone has one or more decent tools, doesn't mean all of his programs are just as good or worth it. I myself like Registry Backup and Windows Repair (All In One). They aren't bad and can be quite helpful sometimes. However, both of them, and all of his other programs are extremely generic compared to CleanMem. The latter deals with the memory manager, which is basically the most complex part of the kernel. The difference in complexity is night and day.
    It is unlikely that a person whose bulk of programs are trivial and basic would also have this very sophisticated program that knows better than the OS itself. Now, if let's say Mark Russinovich wrote a program like that it would be a lot more believable, because he has a lot of programs for debugging, troubleshooting, monitoring, diagnosing, etc. He deals with low-level stuff and the inner workings of the OS all the time. He would be a lot more credible source of a "memory optimizer". Yet, he doesn't have one, and even says such programs are useless.
     
  4. Mayahana

    Mayahana Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2014
    Posts:
    2,220
    Keep quiet, until you read up on it. You are sounding worse by the day. He's not re-writing the OS's optimizer, he's merely triggering it more often so it is better functioning. Take 3 minutes out of your day and read.

    Funny thing is, I have played games that crashed all of the time unless I was running CleanMem due to tremendous memory leaks (World of Tanks for example). CleanMem forces a system cleanup of 'junk' in memory(using MS's own calls), which kept the program from crashing. Priceless if you ask me, now I run it on every machine I have regardless of the AMOUNT of ram - it's a vacuum cleaner for junk programming.
     
  5. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    I agree Mayahana, I used to have to occasionally power down my system and unplug it, and then restart. Haven't had to do that since running CleanMem

    Pete
     
  6. nnikoss

    nnikoss Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2015
    Posts:
    7
    A couple of weeks before,a client of mine brought to me a Win 7x32bit and 4GB Mem. laptop with a strange problem(Chrome and FF installed).
    When you visit a ''heavy'' site with Chrome,the broswer froze for 3-4 sec. and after that you can browse wherever you want with no problem.
    The same problem for FF too. Open, visit a heavy site like C-net,Yahoo mail, Firefox and the whole system froze for about twenty seconds.
    I was pretty sure this problem had nothing to do with memory and the only solution i could find it was completely disable FF fonts in about config,but unfortunately the client didnt like it,although this solved the issue.
    Then,i instaled cleanmem,just to test it,it even not crossed my mind that it could do something about it.
    Magically the problem solved!
     
  7. Alexhousek

    Alexhousek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2009
    Posts:
    662
    Location:
    USA--Oregon
    I totally agree with Mayahana (and Peter). Take a couple minutes and just read what Shane says about Cleanmem. He makes no promises and his claims are realistic. Just try it. At the very least, quit blasting something you haven't tried.

    http://www.pcwintech.com/about-cleanmem
     
  8. Night_Raven

    Night_Raven Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Posts:
    388
    First of all, I have read what CleanMem does and I have tried it a few years ago. It didn't improve anything in any way.
    Speaking of memory leaks and the memory manager, maybe you should educate yourselves first. A good starting point would be the Mysteries of Memory Management Revealed talk with Mark Russinovich: Part 1 and Part 2 (which MrBrian already posted earlier in the topic). Another good watch is Pushing the Limits of Windows. You know, actual technical information and explanation from the best source, not some vague mumbo-jumbo.
     
    Last edited: Feb 2, 2015
  9. Mayahana

    Mayahana Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2014
    Posts:
    2,220
    What were you expecting it to improve? Do you have diagnostic logs showing nothing was improved in any way?

    I've said it multiple times, it actually allowed World of Tanks to be playable, and was the only product that allowed it to be playable while the developers of that game got off their lazy rears and patched it. A documented memory leak issue was fixed by this little tool. Also it's pretty obvious with 'cursory' testing that it does this for a variety of things. Remember it's just causing Windows to do what it already does - more regularly, so the end result is a cleaner running, more stable system. You seem to keep referring to documents that have nothing to do with this product. It's NOT a memory optimizer - that's why we assume you have no idea what you are talking about.
     
  10. Night_Raven

    Night_Raven Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Posts:
    388
    Why am I supposed to show anything? The program claims it improves things so the burden of proof falls on it to proove it does it, not to people to prove that it doesn't.
    But whatever, I see it's pointless. Just like it was in the last discussion. I wasted a lot of time and effort to try and explain things. I'm not going to make the same mistake again and waste my time with people who prefer to rely on hunches, guesses, sixth sense, etc. instead of facts and logic.

    I'm done with this crap.
     
  11. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Posts:
    4,537
    You should already have gone...

    Bye bye...
     
  12. J_L

    J_L Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    8,738
    Good riddance, sheesh. All that was proven was either lack of reading comprehension or ignorance (on at least "Some facts about CleanMem (PLEASE READ):"), and cowardly name-calling without proving anything but crap.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.