Malwarebytes Techbench

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by Stigg, Nov 24, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Stigg

    Stigg Registered Member

    I would have thought that Malwarebytes Techbench would have been discussed before on this forum, but I searched and was unable to find it.

    In my opinion, it is very pricey and has a yearly renewal. At that price, I can't imagine there being too many sales, no matter how good it is.

    Have any of you guys had the opportunity to try it? If so, what do you think?
     
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2013
  2. whitedragon551

    whitedragon551 Registered Member

    Seems extremely pricey. In a corporate environment that is properly setup and monitored, a tool that expensive should never be needed in the first place.
     
  3. Stigg

    Stigg Registered Member

    Yes. I guess that is where they are trying to aim it at, but I cannot imagine a corporate environment needing it as they don't allow their systems to be infiltrated to start with.

    I think this thing has lost the race before it has started, in my opinion.
     
  4. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Yes, the only thing I can think of are computer repair shops. For example if you would have 100 infected customers a year, then your expenses will be $5 per customer, which you could incorporate in the price.
     
  5. Baserk

    Baserk Registered Member

    As in, when you set 'Don't allow' nothing will ever happen? I'd disagree.
    It does seem to be for a very specific niche market, as BoerenkoolMetWorst points out.
     
  6. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    a serious supporter wont do that, BoerenkoolMetWorst
    Reason: https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showpost.php?p=2310755&postcount=11

    ... uses other methods to secure user data. a server is more expensive but offers lot more options - for SMB with less than 10 (or 5) clients some software has no costs (only for maintenance).
     
  7. Stigg

    Stigg Registered Member

    That is the point I was trying to make.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice