AVC-August Results

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by trjam, Sep 17, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
  2. Noob

    Noob Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    6,491
    So TrendMicro does great in dynamic tests? :)
    Never expected that tbh :D
     
  3. operamail

    operamail Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2011
    Posts:
    254
    Thanks for the link. Don't know which test to trust. Any way I'll stick with what I like and what makes me comfortable the most.:)
     
  4. Brocke

    Brocke Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2008
    Posts:
    2,306
    Location:
    USA,IA
    wow pc tools did great but Webroot wow.

    it will be interesting seeing AVG 2012 tested
     
  5. clocks

    clocks Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,788
    YTD, Norton still tops. :thumb:
     
  6. toxinon12345

    toxinon12345 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2010
    Posts:
    1,200
    Location:
    Managua, Nicaragua
    Lol@avast!
     
  7. Kernelwars

    Kernelwars Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Posts:
    2,155
    Location:
    TX
    wow trendmicro..great job:thumb:
     
  8. Thankful

    Thankful Savings Monitor

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2005
    Posts:
    6,567
    Location:
    New York City
    I wonder if they are using Eset 5 since some results are 'user dependent'.
    Nice to see improvement with Avira. Not a great month for F-Secure.
     
  9. toxinon12345

    toxinon12345 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2010
    Posts:
    1,200
    Location:
    Managua, Nicaragua
    Well I would not suprise if it were v4, as it receives the same signatures and the dependant part can occur in completely unknown threats like NewHeur_PE or packer detections.
     
  10. J_L

    J_L Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    8,738
    Symantec did the best, meaning they've used their resources effectively. Can't say the same for McAfee.

    Overall, I'm satisfied with the results of the products I'm using.
     
  11. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Posts:
    6,102
    Location:
    on my zx10-r
    wow surprised at avast...was def hoping for better
     
  12. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Posts:
    9,146
    IMO user-dependent is as good as a fail. Great results for very few, decent for a few more, pretty poor for the rest.
     
  13. Nevis

    Nevis Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Posts:
    812
    Location:
    255.255.255.255
    impressed by norton as always

    surprised by trend micro ... :) good job

    overall, famous AV have done well
     
  14. Osaban

    Osaban Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Posts:
    5,616
    Location:
    Milan and Seoul
    It's nice to see Avira where it belongs.
     
  15. sg09

    sg09 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    Posts:
    2,811
    Location:
    Kolkata, India
    FTW trend. its time to improve your on-demand detection.
     
  16. J_L

    J_L Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    8,738
    You mean real-time protection.
     
  17. Legendkiller

    Legendkiller Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Posts:
    1,053
    f-secure and avast are little down in the tests then most of us would have expected......
     
  18. Stefan Kurtzhals

    Stefan Kurtzhals AV Expert

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2003
    Posts:
    702
    Actually, we didn't really improve things related to this test. The improvement in detection rate wasn't that big for Avira, but rather other AVs dropped somewhat. Weird. Summer holidays? :)

    I expect much better protection when the next version of ProActiv and the NV AI are introduced.
     
  19. PJC

    PJC Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Posts:
    2,959
    Location:
    Internet
    Compared with the 2010 results,

    Symantec and BitDefender have made a huge progress during 2011. :thumb:

    Avira and Panda dropped...:doubt:
     
  20. pykko

    pykko Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Posts:
    2,236
    Location:
    Romania...and walking to heaven
    What is NV AI? :D
     
  21. sm1

    sm1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Posts:
    570
    K7 doing better than Eset and Kaspersky? I have to check k7 products now:cool:
     
  22. Stefan Kurtzhals

    Stefan Kurtzhals AV Expert

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2003
    Posts:
    702
    They put my brain into a box :D No, it's not a big box :rolleyes:
     
  23. flaubert71

    flaubert71 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Posts:
    45
    I wish we'd see Vipre in more of these comparisons...I know it's light on resources and scans real fast, but I want to see how it compares.
     
  24. pykko

    pykko Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Posts:
    2,236
    Location:
    Romania...and walking to heaven
    That would have made Avira the best :D
     
  25. Nevis

    Nevis Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Posts:
    812
    Location:
    255.255.255.255
    didnt notice but this time K7 has scored very well
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.