Mantaining Updates

Discussion in 'ESET NOD32 Antivirus' started by lynjac, Sep 5, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. lynjac

    lynjac Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2011
    Posts:
    1
    What is the point of regularly updating your definitions when you still get infected with viruses that are 3 years old ? Shouldnt the latest definitions protect you agianst that?

    I am stuck with the Win32/Sality.nar virus even though my boxs definitions are up to date.


    Eset has to be the most useless piece of crap anti-virus package ever - Im going back to Sophos.
     
  2. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,456
    Don't know how you've found out that this variant of Sality is 3 years old as malware is being updated constantly to evade detection.

    In the case of viruses infecting other computers via network it is necessary to find the source of infection. Perhaps somebody connected a notebook not running ESET and infected with a virus to your network. In that case, the virus would spread across the network but infected files should be detected and cleaned.

    I'd suggest providing ESET with more details about the infection (SysInspector, Threat logs from affected computers) as well as a bunch of affected files that cannot be cleaned or are completely undetected and you deem them suspicious.
     
  3. NoobStick

    NoobStick Guest

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Posts:
    0
    Hello lynjac
    No vendor can offer 100 procent protection,... it would be nice wouldn't it :) .
    Malware are easily changed/updated by the malware creator, you cannot expect 100 procent detection, that is why multi layered protection is necessary, but that you know of course . If you still have the malware sample please submit it, so we all can benefit of your discovery : http://kb.eset.com/esetkb/index?pag...earch&viewlocale=en_US&searchid=1315235154534

    All the best

    NoobStick
     
  4. piranha

    piranha Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Posts:
    623
    Location:
    Laval, Qu?bec, Canada
    for sure, you wont be better protect with Sophos :cautious: o_O

    and what was your protection when you were infected ?

    antivirus only ?
    av and firewall ? wich one ?
    av and firewall with HIPS ?
    av and firewall with HIPS and sandboxing ?
     
  5. toxinon12345

    toxinon12345 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2010
    Posts:
    1,200
    Location:
    Managua, Nicaragua
    Follow the Marcos advice for solving this problem.
     
  6. dr pan k

    dr pan k Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2007
    Posts:
    204
    i dont see the reason for replying to people who create an account just to post how an AV sucks over another one... i thought there was a word for that, elf or something similar...
     
  7. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,752
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    Your very close.
     
  8. siljaline

    siljaline Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Posts:
    6,618
  9. agoretsky

    agoretsky Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Posts:
    4,033
    Location:
    California
    Hello,

    The Win32/Sality malware familiy is constantly being updated. It is likely you were infected by a variant which was detected by the old signature but is something newer. If you still have some infected files they can be submitted to ESET's virus lab for further analysis.

    Regards,

    Aryeh Goretsky
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.