AppGuard 3.x 32/64 Bit

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by shadek, Mar 12, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    I did an over the top install on the first of my machines. I run XP Pro SP 3 on all of them. Went perfectly and seems to be running just fine.

    Took me a minute to figure out why some sysinternals stuff didn't get blocked.

    Only issue so far is one app that is on a USB key, when it starts starts java and firefox. Before all I had to do was deal with the USB protection, but now it takes going to install mode. I am getting memory read errors so I will play with it.

    Pete
     
  2. jmonge

    jmonge Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Posts:
    13,744
    Location:
    Canada
    let us know please peter:thumb:
     
  3. Trespasser

    Trespasser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Posts:
    1,204
    Location:
    Virginia - Appalachian Mtns
    Did you have to add Sandboxie's C:\Sandbox to Guarded Apps>Folders as an Exception (Read/Write permission)?

    It seems their automatic USB loading policy has changed. Before in version 3 AppGuard prevented it. Now it is permitted. The new version is running very well on my PC (Win 7).

    Thanks.

    Later...

    Bob
     
  4. Eirik

    Eirik Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Posts:
    544
    Location:
    Chantilly, Virginia
    Did AppGuard report any blocking events? If so, please let us know.

    Also, if you set AppGuard protection to "Off" do you still observe these symptoms?

    Thanks,

    Eirik
     
  5. Eirik

    Eirik Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Posts:
    544
    Location:
    Chantilly, Virginia
    What protection mode are you in when you see these observations?

    Are you manually launching an executable from the USB device? Or, is something automatically launching without user-initiating it (just device insertion). This could be an important distinction/observation.

    In "high" protection mode or less, with the 'Trusted Publisher' capability, a user should be able to manually launch a digitally signed (by one of the trusted publishers) executable from a USB device that would have previously been blocked by version 3.0.
     
  6. Trespasser

    Trespasser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Posts:
    1,204
    Location:
    Virginia - Appalachian Mtns
    Eirik,
    My protection mode is High. I'm just inserting a USB drive and Windows offers to open it. No execution of any application is involved. Sorry if I was unclear. If I recall correctly, in version 3 AppGuard disabled autorun and would not allow even Windows to offer to open the inserted USB drive. I would have to go into Computer to access it.

    Thanks for your inquiry.

    Later...

    Bob
     
  7. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Erik

    The application I was launching from the USB isn't signed. Also the problem was with a Java script. I have System Internals ProcExp running all the time, and I was seeing a memory block message. I've added it to the list, and I still get it.

    Pete
     
  8. Barb_C

    Barb_C Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Posts:
    1,234
    Location:
    Virginia
    Peter, we have verified in the lab that there is a bug and autorun.inf is not being blocked on USB memory sticks. Thanks for the input!
     
  9. jerick70

    jerick70 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Posts:
    53
    I found a bug with the systray icon. The icon will not change back to enabled, the green check, when the protection level is off and you make changes in the customization window and AppGuard turns the protection level back on. Here are the steps I took to create this condition...

    1) I changed the protection level to "off" to test if a program was being blocked by AppGuard.
    2) When I saw that this was being blocked by AppGuard, I open AppGuard and went to customize and then User-Space tab. I added a folder to the User-Space tab and change include to no.
    3) I clicked apply and AppGuard said that it had to re-enable the protection level.
    4) I exited out of the interface and the systray icon was still showing off.

    I have included a picture to show you what I am talking about.
     

    Attached Files:

  10. Barb_C

    Barb_C Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Posts:
    1,234
    Location:
    Virginia
    Bob, our lab has verified that there is a bug in the beta. Autorun.inf is not being blocked on USB memory sticks. Thanks for alerting us!
     
  11. jerick70

    jerick70 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Posts:
    53
    I have a feature request. :)

    Here's the deal, I have a program that on execution creates a temporary folder in user-space and runs a few separate .exe files from that temporary folder. The folder is deleted on close of the program. It would be nice if you could free enter a path that you could add to the user-space area.
     
  12. Barb_C

    Barb_C Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Posts:
    1,234
    Location:
    Virginia
    Hi Jerick, Thanks for testing AppGuard. I have tried to replicate your issue and it is working okay for me. Would you try the following:

    1) Check the status display and see if there are any messages saying that the service has stopped. If the GUI Interface detects that the Service is not running, it will change the icon to a red X. Perhaps that's the issue.
    2) Check the Services control panel and check if the "Blue Ridge AppGuard Service" is running.
    3) Can you do something that AppGuard should block to see if AppGuard is really in High protection level?
    4) Lastly, try exiting the GUI and then restart it. If that clears up the issue, let us know if AppGuard gets in that state again.
     
  13. Barb_C

    Barb_C Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Posts:
    1,234
    Location:
    Virginia
    Good idea. I'll see if we can get that into the final release.
     
  14. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Update

    By adding a few things to the memguard list, I got my USB software to run properly. Also I've installed on 2nd of 4 computers, and it's looking good there.

    Have another test on that machine, but I can't test until Monday, when i have a goto webinar to join.

    Overall looking good.

    Pete
     
  15. Cutting_Edgetech

    Cutting_Edgetech Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Posts:
    5,694
    Location:
    USA
    XP Pro X32 SP3. I did a complete uninstall of the latest non beta version, and then installed the beta. I noticed a few things right off the bat. I will make separate post on all of them to make it easier to follow along. First I am concerned that Sun Miscrosystems Inc, and Adobe by default settings are not protected applications. If the default settings are not changed then could Adobe, and Java exploits bypass AG's protection? Adobe, and Microsystems Inc make applications that are regularly used as a vessel to exploit users OS's. I would recommend those applications be protected by the default settings.

    Edited: 7/08/11 @ 7:25
    Also Mozilla, and Google are on that list which I forgot to mention.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jul 8, 2011
  16. jerick70

    jerick70 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Posts:
    53
    Here are the answers to your questions....

    1) The AppGuard interface show that everything is normal.
    2) The service is still running.
    3) AppGuard did block an action that it normally will.
    4) Exiting the GUI and reopening seemed to have fixed the red x on the icon.
     
  17. Cutting_Edgetech

    Cutting_Edgetech Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Posts:
    5,694
    Location:
    USA
    Correct me if i'm wrong, but I believe i was informed in the last phase of beta testing that this is not expected behavior. Appguard is blocking XP Pro X 32 SP3 from checking for windows updates when protection is enabled. This is not particular to this beta. It is also present in the latest final release. As shown below windows is unable to check for updates when AG protection is enabled. If AG is changed to install mode then XP can then check for windows updates. AG event logs is showing a lot of actions being blocked when checking for updates when protection is enabled. There is one difference pertaining to this issue in this beta release, and the last final release. In the last final release XP was being blocked from checking for updates even when in install mode on my test machines. Now it is not. I did not have this problem during the last phase of beta testing with Windows 7. It was only present with XP. Is this expected behavior? Take a look at the attached AG event log below for more info.
     

    Attached Files:

  18. Trespasser

    Trespasser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Posts:
    1,204
    Location:
    Virginia - Appalachian Mtns
    Does that mean that I get the Golf shirt that Eirik mentioned (x-large, please)? Or another free AppGuard registration key? I already have one but another would be nice. You know...relatives and all.... ;). :D .

    BTW, don't take me seriously. I'm just pulling your leg. Eirik's leg, not yours, Barb (that wouldn't be proper...:D ).

    Later....

    Bob
     
  19. Cutting_Edgetech

    Cutting_Edgetech Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Posts:
    5,694
    Location:
    USA
    This is something very minor, but may be worth mentioning. After the installation was complete AG was showing a memory guard rule for Prevx in C:\programs directory. I have not had Prevx installed on this machine in a long time. I did a search for any orphaned files left from my past Prevx installation, and none where found. I only checked C drive, and not the registry. I'm pretty sure I had removed this rule from memory guard months ago. I'm just wondering where these settings are stored. Are they stored in the policy file or the registry?
     

    Attached Files:

  20. Barb_C

    Barb_C Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Posts:
    1,234
    Location:
    Virginia
    The Guard List policy takes precedence over the publisher list so since Mozilla and Acrobat Reader are in the Guard list, they are automatically Guarded. The publisher list only applies to the applications found in user-space. Anyway we will certainly consider changing the default trusted publisher policy for the release. Thanks!
     
  21. Barb_C

    Barb_C Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Posts:
    1,234
    Location:
    Virginia
    Hi Cutting_Edge,

    When protection is enabled, AppGuard will interfere with updates when they are done from I.E. There is actually a help topic on this subject.

    In this release, we have changed the Install Mode setting to UnGuard the browsers since many users try to install programs directly from the browser. Hopefully I've addressed your questions, but it is Friday night and I must confess that I have had a glass of wine.

    Thanks for your feedback.
     
  22. Barb_C

    Barb_C Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Posts:
    1,234
    Location:
    Virginia
    Bob, Funny! I mentioned to Eirik earlier today that he should give you a Golf-Shirt for this find. The shirts are actually very nice.
     
  23. Barb_C

    Barb_C Developer

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Posts:
    1,234
    Location:
    Virginia
    Hi again,

    The prevx entry must be coming from a previous policy file (not stored in registry), but I will pass this along to our install developer to make sure that things are getting cleaned up properly. Did you over-install or uninstall and re-install?
     
  24. pegr

    pegr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Posts:
    2,280
    Location:
    UK
    And that's what I find most disappointing about the way this feature has been implemented.

    What I would like to see is a way of automatically trusting digitally signed applications from trusted publishers, irrespective of whether they reside in user space or system space. The applications that I want to automatically trust and exclude from AppGuard protections all reside in system space. This would have reduced the number of MemoryGuard exceptions that have to be manually added for system utilities and other security applications.

    Another thing I find disappointing is that there is still no way to exclude additional partitions containing system objects (e.g. recovery partitions, secondary system partitions, etc) from User-Space and move them back into System-Space. Folders can be moved from System-Space to User-Space by adding them to the list in the User-Space tab but there is no way of going in the other direction. Setting "Include" to "No" against an entry in the list in the User-Space tab tells AppGuard to ignore the folder entirely; but it doesn't move it back to System-Space with the associated protection that defines System-Space.

    Given the basic conceptual framework that AppGuard uses, there should be a way of overriding the default definition of BOTH spaces, not just User-Space.
     
  25. Cutting_Edgetech

    Cutting_Edgetech Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Posts:
    5,694
    Location:
    USA
    I uninstalled, and reinstalled. Enjoy your Wine, and thanks for taking the time to reply on a Friday night :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.