Do you use HOSTS file?

Discussion in 'polls' started by Zimzi, Dec 20, 2008.

?

Which HOSTS file do you use?

  1. MVP

    60 vote(s)
    27.9%
  2. HP

    6 vote(s)
    2.8%
  3. Mike's Ad Blocking

    3 vote(s)
    1.4%
  4. Dan Pollock's

    2 vote(s)
    0.9%
  5. Other (Which?)

    17 vote(s)
    7.9%
  6. I do not use HOSTS file (Why?)

    127 vote(s)
    59.1%
  1. ExtremeGamerBR

    ExtremeGamerBR Registered Member

    I do not use, to block malware using the ClearCloud DNS + Norton Safe Web. :thumb:
     
  2. datarishik

    datarishik Registered Member

  3. Francis93

    Francis93 Registered Member

    Yes, and my HOSTS file is over 5mb.

    A combination of MVPS, Dan Pollock's, Cameleon and hp.
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2011
  4. Heimdall

    Heimdall Registered Member

    I don't use a hosts file, as I'd rather not have some third party make decisions about sites I may want to visit. I also have no need for ad-blocking, as this is taken care of via other, more sophisticated, means.

    All in all I consider hosts files to be a waste time.
     
  5. Francis93

    Francis93 Registered Member

    Restored the default hosts file, and appended a few, necessary lines. Now it's 6kb. I have noticed that having a massive Hosts file craps your Internet connection and locks the PC.

    Oh well. Anyway, there's ESET and common sense. I can even use a DNS service.

     
  6. nikanthpromod

    nikanthpromod Registered Member

    NONE

    Bcoz its slows up my speed..
     
  7. TomAZ

    TomAZ Registered Member

    If you use HostsMan as a hosts file manager along with Spybot SD to lock the hosts file, does HostMan have any functionality at all when the hosts file is locked -- or does Spybot need to be "unlocked" every time before you can update the hosts file or perform any other hosts file activity?

    Also, when using Spybot for this purpose, does Spybot need to always be "active," or can you simply lock the hosts file and then close Spybot down?
     
  8. FiOS Dan

    FiOS Dan Registered Member

    Please refer to screenshot.
     

    Attached Files:

  9. adam993

    adam993 Registered Member

    I don't use special HOSTS file, because I don't need.
    I have installed WOT and also configured Norton DNS.
     
  10. m00nbl00d

    m00nbl00d Registered Member

    You should remove the direct link to that domain... Just in case. :D ;)
     
  11. Page42

    Page42 Registered Member

    Geez, m00nbl00d, you just responded to a 2+ year old post.
    No wonder it didn't look familiar to me. :p
    FWIW, the post is too old for me to edit, so if you were serious about removing the link, it'll have to be some mod's chore.
    I did check it at urlvoid for you, and it says it's clean.
    By the way, I'm currently not running a HOSTS file. ;)
     
  12. m00nbl00d

    m00nbl00d Registered Member

    Which link? ;) It's not the dslreports, if that's what you had in mind. Rather this one -http://hosts-file.net/?s=search-and-destroy.com

    That's not the website (-http://www.search-and-destroy.com <-- naughty!!! :D) for Spybot. :argh:
     
  13. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    FYI. That search-and-destroy.com domain is a GoDaddy.com parked page now.
     
  14. Page42

    Page42 Registered Member

    That's what I saw, and urlvoid has no issues with it.
    @ m00nbl00d, it never was a website for SpyBot, which was the point, it was a rogue being served up.
     
  15. m00nbl00d

    m00nbl00d Registered Member

    Yeah... that's what I had just figured out. lol Thanks for the feedback, though. :thumb:

    The damn domain just ringed a bell... so, I prompty replied and mentioned it wasn't the real deal. Glad this crap is down!
     
  16. m00nbl00d

    m00nbl00d Registered Member

    Yes, I know that. But, considering the link was active, users could click on it. lol No problem, though, as it's down! :thumb:

    Next time, I'll double check if it's down or not... I just rushed because I was familiar with it, from past days. :blink:
     
  17. Cvette

    Cvette Registered Member

    I don't use a hosts file.

    I find the combination of Norton DNS and Avast! 6.0's built-in website blacklist to be effective enough for me.
     
  18. tipstir

    tipstir Registered Member

    MVP works it has block access to a lot of sites that deem bad. Doesn't slow the system. I did notice that you can reduce the size of it to 97KB instead of 600KB. Those tags need to come out. A good defense starts at the source of the problem the browser. HOST can be use on Android devices. Which I do use.
     
  19. TomAZ

    TomAZ Registered Member

    Within HostsMan, what does "resolve host name" do?
     
  20. m00nbl00d

    m00nbl00d Registered Member

    It will translate a domain (example www.wilderssecurity.com) to its IP address.
     
  21. datarishik

    datarishik Registered Member

  22. ExtremeGamerBR

    ExtremeGamerBR Registered Member

    Now, I use Sandboxie, no more filters!
     
  23. FiOS Dan

    FiOS Dan Registered Member

    I use four files totalling 132K entries. Pray tell how many do you have? BTW thanks for the list...think I will add them to my Hostsman lineup.
     
  24. PJC

    PJC Very Frequent Poster

  25. datarishik

    datarishik Registered Member

    I think the only ones worth using right now are MVPS, hphosts and Dan Pollock's Hosts as these are updated regularly while the rest are not.

    Whereas Dan Pollock's hosts is updated every two days, MVPS and hphosts are updated every month or so I think. Now I have narrowed down to only two hosts files, MVPS and Dan Pollock's. I think hphosts is a bit too aggressive and so not for me.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice