MRG Flash Tests 2011

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by LODBROK, Jan 27, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. nosirrah

    nosirrah Malware Fighter

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2006
    Posts:
    560
    Location:
    Cummington MA USA
    And you honestly think 23,000 tells you something about 0day performance? Unless those 23,000 under 24 hours old all that tells you is how well a vendor defines legacy samples which to me, is nothing more than marketing BS.

    Personally I'd like to see a mix of both worlds as in 1000 samples a day where the MD5 did not exist before that day. That aggregated over time would likely change some minds.
     
  2. NAMOR

    NAMOR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Posts:
    1,530
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    At what point does the the BB jump into action? If the A2/Ikarus engine(s) see the potential threat first will the BB have time to intercept anything? It would be interesting to have Mamutu included in the new round of tests.
     
  3. atomomega

    atomomega Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Posts:
    1,290
    Wow! really? oh well...
    yeah right...
    Mamutu does not 'detect' malware per se, instead, it blocks malware after-execution based on behavioural patterns. So a comparison against signature detection would be pretty much unfair.
     
  4. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,873
    Location:
    Outer space
    Yes, I asked Sveta a while ago to include Mamutu and Threatfire in the testing and he replied that they would like to add them soon but they're very busy.
     
  5. NAMOR

    NAMOR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Posts:
    1,530
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO

    That's my point. I believe that the real-time scanner (w/ sigs) makes the first interception, then the BB double checks afterward or checks is their isn't a signature. I could be wrong.

    Why? AFAIK Defensewall has 0 sigs and according to Zemana's site they don't rely on sigs either (at least not in the traditional sense).


    I guess this thread got me thinking about EAM's detections.


    http://support.emsisoft.com/topic/3462-strange-detection/page__p__20003#entry20003
     
  6. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,873
    Location:
    Outer space
    The abysmal results of PCtools AV + Spyware doctor are not influenced by Threatfire, the behavior blocker is off in default settings
    Thanks, nice thread, didn't know about that.
    Still, MRG does a on demand scan before executing the sample so this wouldn't negatively influence the results.
     
  7. NAMOR

    NAMOR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Posts:
    1,530
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    Yeah, it just got me thinking about when the BB activates. :D
     
  8. J_L

    J_L Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    8,738
    Defensewall and Zemana doesn't detect malware either. In fact, MRG includes a HIPS, Behavior Blockers, Anti-Loggers section.

    Mamutu shouldn't be added though, because Emsisoft Anti-Malware already includes it.
     
  9. NAMOR

    NAMOR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Posts:
    1,530
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    Safe'n'sec would be an interesting addition.
     
  10. Francis93

    Francis93 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Posts:
    311
    It seems that they stopped testing?
     
  11. atomomega

    atomomega Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Posts:
    1,290
    Yeah, I forgot about those. Sorry guys. Eitherway, why is it that they compare signature based products against BB, HIPS in the same test?
     
  12. J_L

    J_L Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    8,738
    I think it's a test of how well security programs protect you from zero-day malware, regardless of what methods they use.

    Maybe the threat should be moved to other anti-malware software section.
     
  13. Zimzi

    Zimzi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2005
    Posts:
    289
    And you honestly think that we should believe MRG testing results rather than own experience with testing Vipre? In my personal experience, Vipre has excellent detection, but, even with malware that is easy to find on the Internet, Vipre is equally efficient as shown by the MRG testing results with 0-day malware !? It is not logical to me.

    Seems that Vipre is top-notch against keyloggers, or 0-day generally but it is not so good against common malware as would be expected based on MRG results?
     
  14. Thankful

    Thankful Savings Monitor

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2005
    Posts:
    6,564
    Location:
    New York City
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2011
  15. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,873
    Location:
    Outer space
  16. Page42

    Page42 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Posts:
    6,944
    Location:
    USA
    Once again, MBAM handles their business quite well,
    and SAS doesn't.
    MBAM and SAS.jpg
     
  17. LethalBoy

    LethalBoy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Posts:
    119
    SAS is taking a beatin :(... but look at Sunbelt they are working very well on VIPRE :D
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2011
  18. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,752
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    o_O Not sure what you mean here as all malware was once 0-day?
     
  19. LethalBoy

    LethalBoy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Posts:
    119

    I think he pretended to say that Vipre is good detecting 0 day malware but not as good with common malware ''malware that is detected by various AV's''. That's what I think he said o_O
     
  20. G1111

    G1111 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Posts:
    2,294
    Location:
    USA
    DW blocked them all:thumb:
     
  21. Page42

    Page42 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Posts:
    6,944
    Location:
    USA
    Can someone provide the link to the overall product comparison, showing results of all 9 (I think) tests?
     
  22. Blues7

    Blues7 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2009
    Posts:
    870
    Location:
    2500'
  23. Rompin Raider

    Rompin Raider Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2010
    Posts:
    1,254
    Location:
    Texas
  24. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,752
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    I see that a few products that were in a deficit position have now pulled even.
     
  25. blasev

    blasev Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Posts:
    763
    Well done emsisoft, and also congrats to avira

    Mbam and deswall is awoesome
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.