F-Prot

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by rdsu, Jan 23, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Posts:
    4,537
    Hi,

    What you think about this Anti-Virus?

    thanks
     
  2. JimIT

    JimIT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,035
    Location:
    Denton, Texas
    One of the best AV's ever made, IMO. ;)
     
  3. minacross

    minacross Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2002
    Posts:
    658
    I second that :D
    Scan engine >> one of the fastest available.
    Detection rate >> very good
    Resources/memeory >> light
    Heuristics >> one of the best
     
  4. Blackcat

    Blackcat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    4,024
    Location:
    Christchurch, UK
    Some recent threads here;

    F-Prot for DOS; http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=14858

    F-Prot for Windows;

    http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=12702

    http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=10006

    As already mentioned, a very good AV with an excellent scanner and a very low memory imprint. Very stable and easy to set up updates and scheduled scans.

    Highly recommended, particularly for newbies and those with older computers and it can also be used as either a primary or backup scanner.

    In addition, the new version 4 will be available soon.
     
  5. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Posts:
    4,537
    Thanks for all your opinions :)

    NOD32 is my favorite, and F-Prot is my second choise...
     
  6. VikingStorm

    VikingStorm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    387
    If you have XP, I'd wait on F-Prot until the next version. As it doesn't have the options for the RTM.
     
  7. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Posts:
    4,537
    Did you know (+/-), when the new version will be release?

    Thanks
     
  8. Blackcat

    Blackcat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    4,024
    Location:
    Christchurch, UK
    I have seen a post which mentioned a possible release time for April/May.

    But F-Prot 4 is due to contain a number of new features including a pop 3 scanner, a quarantine feature and a better unpacking engine.

    Since even a beta has not yet been seen, I think a gold release sometime in the latter half of the year is more likely.
     
  9. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Posts:
    4,537
    Very nice new features!!!

    Thanks ;)
     
  10. jim_k

    jim_k Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2004
    Posts:
    51
    I e-mailed FRISK Software sales about F-Prot 4. They said they will release a beta about 2 months before the product is officially released. They didn't give any approximate date for the release of the first beta.

    It sounds like it is going to be a big improvement. I hope it remains low in resource usage.

    F-Prot is a great virus scanner. I used to use Norton AntiVirus, but I got tired of the excessive bloat and Symantec's lack of good support. Plus, they kept raising the subscription prices. FRISK Software seems to have their act together. When I have contacted their support or sales, I have always gotten a useful reply.
     
  11. VikingStorm

    VikingStorm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Posts:
    387
    Reviving an old topic (almost 4 months later), but has anyone heard anything about the next version of F-Prot for windows?
     
  12. Arin

    Arin Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Posts:
    997
    Location:
    India
    F-Prot is a very sweet AV. its one of my favourite AVs because of its industrial strength scanning engine, small memory footprint, stability and ease of use. infact i never saw it utilizing more than 2MB of RAM where NOD32 or DrWeb gobbles up as much as 10-12MB. but there are two sore points, one is the engine update means the total product upgrade and the second is the unpacking support which is not a part of the update-able database ( like NOD32, AVP or BitDefender ) but a part of the engine. in 2K/XP platform the RTM is not configurable though the default configuration is good enough. its just that i can't run the RTM in paranoid mode yet. for best protection you still have to edit the registry to enable Neural Network for the heuristic module in some cases. but over all a very good product.
     
  13. Pigman

    Pigman Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2004
    Posts:
    381
    Best freeware AV ever made. Now if only it came with resident protection... sigh.
     
  14. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    163,899
    Location:
    Texas
    Have you considered paying for the program? Pennies a day for one of the best.
    Plus, you have support with the product.
    It runs on all Windows versions. :)
     
  15. Tired

    Tired Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Posts:
    50
    Location:
    Boston
    I have been using F-Prot for almost a year and have no problems although I am annoyed at having to close all the windows that pop up when it scans and updates. have not found a way to set it to do that in the background. Anybody know any tips or tricks?
    Cheers.
    T
     
  16. grey

    grey Guest

    Can anyone tell me if F-Prot can be used with Windows ME ? Which version if it can? And is it free? Thanks All.
     
  17. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    163,899
    Location:
    Texas
  18. Arin

    Arin Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Posts:
    997
    Location:
    India
    the latest F-Prot version is 3.14e both for Windows and DOS. it'll run fine on Windows ME and you can use the task scheduler to schedule automatic update.
     
  19. grey

    grey Guest

    So what you're saying is F-Prot for Dos will not work with Windows ME, Correct?
     
  20. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    163,899
    Location:
    Texas
  21. Arin

    Arin Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Posts:
    997
    Location:
    India
    no Grey, F-Prot for DOS will work on ME.
     
  22. NAMOR

    NAMOR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Posts:
    1,530
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    @VikingStorm

    Here is an email that I recieved for their sales/support center when asking about upgrading from ver 3.14e to version 4.
     
  23. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    163,899
    Location:
    Texas

    Good info. Thanks.
     
  24. Blackcat

    Blackcat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    4,024
    Location:
    Christchurch, UK
    Thanks for the heads up, NAMOR

    I was just talking to one of the mods here about when the 'new' F-Prot was likely.

    Now if they can improve their trojan detection, the unpacking engine, include a quarantine, an exclude function and more tweakability for the RTM (in NT/XP systems) in F-Prot 4 :doubt:

    I still think a more likely release will be towards the very end of the year.
     
  25. Madsen DK

    Madsen DK Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2002
    Posts:
    324
    Location:
    Denmark
    Just saw at the page, that the 30 day trail comes without an update component. :rolleyes:
    Even if it can be updated manually, why dont include the component in the trail?? Does not make sense to me o_O
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.