What's the best free AV?

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by notageek, Aug 17, 2002.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. notageek

    notageek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Posts:
    1,601
    Location:
    Ohio
    Well Blaze the real best AV is not having a computer at all. :D lol.
     
  2. Randy_Bell

    Randy_Bell Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Posts:
    3,004
    Location:
    Santa Clara, CA
    These are the free ones I know of:

    AntiVir Personal Edition
    http://www.free-av.com/

    AVAST32 Antivirus
    http://www.avast.com/

    AVG Anti-Virus System
    http://www.grisoft.com/html/us_index.htm

    F-Prot Antivirus for DOS
    http://www.f-prot.com/products/fpdos.html

    Both AVG and F-Prot have excellent reputations. F-Prot is known for its macro virus detection and cleaning abilities. AVG is perhaps best known for its outgoing email scanning (certifying your email to be virus-free).

    None of the free products can afford to update their signatures as often as the paid products. Perhaps notageek has the right idea: use a paid product as primary AV, and a free product as a backup. :D
     
  3. wizard

    wizard Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    818
    Location:
    Europe - Germany - Duesseldorf
    F-Prot provides daily updates if you download the signature files from a f-secure ftp-server. :)

    But I agree a free av cannot replace a commercial one at the moment. And F-Prot for DOS is the perfect second scanner because it works on demand only.

    wizard
     
  4. trunfa

    trunfa Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2002
    Posts:
    1
    You didn't mention

    Antidote
    http://www.vintage-solutions.com/English/Antivirus/Super/Download.html

    which although being only a "Detect-only program" can be useful
    and

    Central Command’s Vexira Antivirus Rescue Disk
    http://www.centralcommand.com/

    which uses more or less the same definitions of Antivir PE and can be used in Windows XP, instead of Fprot for Dos which doesn't run in Windows XP (it only scans some directories)
     
  5. mothman

    mothman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2003
    Posts:
    10
    Location:
    So Cal
    Personally I have yet to have a bad experience with AVG. If you keep the virus sigs updated, scan your system regularly and implement a heaping dose of healthy paranoia and use both an IDS and firewall, then you are you in good shape. There is nothing wrong with FREE. Just depends on how vigilant you are when using said free product, partcularly when it comes to pc security.
     
  6. meneer

    meneer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2002
    Posts:
    1,132
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Quite right.
    A virus is hardly more then a threat that exploits some vulnerability (system or user ;) related). If you can diminish the risks involved by reducing the number of vulnerabilities, it is not sooo very important which tooling you use. It's just a matter of compensating risks by taking the right measures. And free or not: I feel there is no single best tool.

    Touch wood... all the virusses my scanner caught last few years were IE related.
    The risk is not the virus, it's the wrong infrastructure... So for real protection 'a heaping dose of healthy paranoia' calls for changing that :)
     
  7. pl@y3r

    pl@y3r Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2004
    Posts:
    1
    lol i'd rather pay for AVG and F-Prot than have Norton or Mcafee for free. the latter two AV scanners are completely useless. I can have a trojan passed Norton just by changing a certain U to a u. I can have a trojan past Mcafee just by changing 6 letters with a hex editor. stick to the free ones mcafee and norton are useless!
     
  8. Peaches4U

    Peaches4U Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    5,070
    Location:
    At my computer
    Hmmm, I turfed AVG because it was always late in getting new updates even though I had configured to check for updates daily. Even manually, it would not download the current available update. Soooo, I am giving Avast a try. So far so good, except for a one time false positive warning.
    http://www.smiliegenerator.de/s23/smilies-44069.png
     
  9. Magica

    Magica Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Posts:
    10
    Location:
    too far :P
    I use AntiVir Personal Edition and I pretty like it. Although there was Norton on this pc initially, I unistalled it.
     
  10. c0ltran3

    c0ltran3 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Posts:
    172
    Why nobody spoke about BitDefender Free and Avast?
     
  11. Cochise

    Cochise A missed friend

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Posts:
    2,549
    Location:
    North Thoresby Lincs Good Olde England
    Exactly....I have now got BitDefender and Avast (Both d/loaded to-day after a little bit of a wake-up call with 'Bagle O' that had somehow got itself involved in a couple of photographs and wouldn't let me send in email without my server stopping them in their tracks......had me scratching my head for a bit 'til Snapdragin came to my aid. Also use AVG....all brilliant...and free.

    Cochise, :cool:
     
  12. MikeBCda

    MikeBCda Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Posts:
    1,627
    Location:
    southern Ont. Canada
    I use avast (home) too -- upgrades are quite frequent, "normally" two or three times a week but I've seen 2 or even 3 the same day if there's a flood of new things hitting the net.

    And support is top-notch, quite active forums in which participation ranges from the Alwil team themselves down to folks who got their first-ever computer last Christmas, and just about every level of experience and expertise in between.
     
  13. Pigman

    Pigman Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2004
    Posts:
    381
    AVG is too much of a RAM hog for my crappy old computer to handle.

    I use AntiVir as a primary AV program. Antivir doesn't have much when it comes to heuristics, though, so if it ever seems that something has gotten past it, I run a scan with F-Prot for DOS.

    Maybe I'll eventually dish out some money for F-Prot for Windows. Then I won't have to have AntiVir for resident protection.
     
  14. nadirah

    nadirah Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Posts:
    3,647
    I find Norton Antivirus 2003 not bad too. Does a good job too. I just find the subscirption service for Norton antivirus not necessary. Wonder why symantec put in this subscription thing for. Probably they wanna make more money.
     
  15. ghodgson

    ghodgson Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Posts:
    835
    Location:
    UK
    I have 2 machines, on my old one with Win98SE I uninstalled Norton AV because of the subscription, and installed AVG. However, the resident boot up check kept crashing my Machine and I couldnt even get into SAFEMODE. It took me a week to sort out. Eventually I uninstalled AVG and installed AVAST........................wonderful. No problems at all. Has anybody else had this problem with AVG??
    My newer machine with XP had Norton NIS and AV pre installed so I have stuck with that, but I see the file size is about 125 MB for both. Too much for my liking.
    Gordon :rolleyes:
     
  16. Pigman

    Pigman Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2004
    Posts:
    381
    I've heard that Panda is putting out a free antivirus program again... you might want to check it out. Just beware of false alarms, though. (Apparently the heuristics aren't top-notch.)
     
  17. I have Been using Anti-vir for a Year nearly Now and I have had No problem with it exept 1 and that is that whenever i change to another window it will crash and I will have to restart the prog and start again but other than that its kept my comp quite safe sooo a thumbs up to Anti-Vir:D
     
  18. slammer_JvA

    slammer_JvA Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Posts:
    1,588
    Location:
    Below sea-level. Safe and sound behind our dikes:
    Second that.
    And André, may I say: what a wonderful way of expressing - must remember that one! :):D

    grtz
    Slammer
     
  19. meneer

    meneer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2002
    Posts:
    1,132
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Thanks :D but I wish that I was that fluent in English. I surely quoted it from someone else? ;)
     
  20. Technical

    Technical Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2003
    Posts:
    471
    Location:
    Brazil
    Technodrome, don't you think that F-Prot for Dos updates are a little bit difficult?
     
  21. Firefighter

    Firefighter Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2002
    Posts:
    1,670
    Location:
    Finland
    As this poll seems not to outline On-Demand snanners out, Please, if u really know better free scanner than eScan Free,

    http://www.mwti.net/antivirus/free_utilities.asp

    tell me immediately.

    eScan Free has Kaspersky engine and is also capable to scan those riskware nasties that Kaspersky is only able to do with extended update settings.

    It has only two weaknessies in my mind;

    1. u need a broadband connection, because the program can't update, so u must download that updated version every time u scan.

    2. The size of those scanned files is limited (if I remember right, u are able to scan files that are less than 1 Mb).

    The extra plus in eScan Free is also that, eScan is able to delete those infected archived files as a whole or rename those infected ones. Very useful if u are scanning infected archived samples colletions, the rest u have in your infected folder after a scan, are those that eScan wasn't able to detect as infected. Why to scan infected archives? Different av:s are reporting the number of infections differently, when you scan infected archives, all scanners are reporting those zipped files about the same way.

    Best regards,
    Firefighter!
     
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2004
  22. c0ltran3

    c0ltran3 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Posts:
    172


    Escan has Kaspersky engine but Escan free is not Kaspersky Antivirus. I used Escan free but it missed somthing and had false positive.
     
  23. c0ltran3

    c0ltran3 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Posts:
    172
    @Firefighter

    There aren't any tests about eScan free. In other posts I read that you made insteresting studies about antivirus (i.e. Claim Antivirus). Is there anything on eScan free, too?

    Regards
     
  24. Firefighter

    Firefighter Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2002
    Posts:
    1,670
    Location:
    Finland
    To c0ltran3 from Firefighter!

    Don't worry about eScan, just scanned my 1375 infected archived samples collection. EScan 4.2.4 detected 1272, when KAV 5.0.121 missed one that eScan detected (eScan won!),

    cyn2.0.zip->EdtSrv.exe is infected with Backdoor:Win32/Cyn.2_0

    by RAV online scan.

    OK, it was editserver, but anyway, no bigger problems with eScan!

    The best not KAV engined av scored 1183, BitDefender 7.2 Free, ClamWin scored 931.

    Best regards,
    Firefighter!
     
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2004
  25. c0ltran3

    c0ltran3 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Posts:
    172
    @Firefighter: Thank you I'm really surprised of the results of your tests. In the past I used eScan free for some months but I wasn't satisfied.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.