Defensewall 3.0 goes Gold

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by Threedog, Apr 20, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Threedog

    Threedog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Posts:
    1,125
    Location:
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Excellent write up Ash. :thumb:
     
  2. AvinashR

    AvinashR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Posts:
    2,063
    Location:
    New Delhi Metallo β-Lactamase 1
    Thanks Bro....

    One thing i have noticed that during the execution of Rogue AV's i have saw some system slowdown and even DefenseWall HIPS got hanged.
     
  3. Saraceno

    Saraceno Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Posts:
    2,405
    Agree, great work and well written. :thumb:

    The other posts in your blog are good to read too. :)
     
  4. AvinashR

    AvinashR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Posts:
    2,063
    Location:
    New Delhi Metallo β-Lactamase 1
    Thank you bro. Its really glad to know that you guys found it nice. I have no single words to explain my happiness.

    I am still waiting for Ilya to have some words with me regarding some technical glitches which i have found during my test.
     
  5. kjdemuth

    kjdemuth Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Posts:
    2,974
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Avinash,
    Sorry about that off the cuff nickname. It just seem to fit. By the way which glitches did you find? I didn't notice in your review.
     
  6. AvinashR

    AvinashR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Posts:
    2,063
    Location:
    New Delhi Metallo β-Lactamase 1
    Hey Bro,

    No Sorry needed !! You are like my brother,and brother should not say sorry. :)

    I have found some technical glitches after publishing my review. When i tested it again with 0Minute malwares :D, i have found that DefenseWall start keep hanging..Even i have noticed that "Untrusted" status was not there in firefox, but it was running as untrusted...Don't know why it happened. It may not be big issue, but still i have found this problem.
     
  7. Threedog

    Threedog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Posts:
    1,125
    Location:
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    "Ash" probably isn't the best nick name to have around Europe right now. LOL.

    I imagine Ilya will be very interested in your findings. One thing I have learned about him over the past few years is that he is a perfectionist, and especially with this new version, he wants everything working perfectly.
     
  8. bellgamin

    bellgamin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    8,102
    Location:
    Hawaii
    DW loads the registry with tons of untrusted leftovers. Ilya says "do not clean DW stuff out of the registry." A major advantage of OA is that it does NOT create deadwood like DW does. (Worse yet, "Rollback" of DW's deadwood can be dangerous to your computer's health.)
     
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2010
  9. gerald100

    gerald100 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Posts:
    4
    kjdemuth,

    Just one question. Are you sure this slow launch can be attributed to DefenseWall? I noticed you run AdblockPlus. Depending on the amount of filter rules, this will slow down launching Adblock. Simply disabling it does show any improvement on my pc's.

    Try uninstalling Adblock and see if it loads much faster. It is very quick to open without this addon.

    Sincerely,

    Gerald
     
  10. kjdemuth

    kjdemuth Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Posts:
    2,974
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    No, I don't think its adblock. I had removed it before in an attempt to see if that was causing the problem.
     
  11. Creer

    Creer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    Posts:
    1,345
    Another advantage:
    - DW is much lighter than OA - only two processes (memory usage)
    - no affecting on OS boot time
     
  12. bellgamin

    bellgamin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    8,102
    Location:
    Hawaii
    Number of processes is not a valid indicator. An app may have only a few processes but still use an enormous amount of system resources.

    I suggest that you surf for one hour then compare DW versus OA as to total cpu usage, I/O bytes, etc. Using those those valid measures of system drag, I believe you will see that OA is lighter than DW.
     
  13. Ilya Rabinovich

    Ilya Rabinovich Developer

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Posts:
    1,543
    In fact, if you have a license installed, DefenseWall checks its type. So, to get HIPS only, download and "install" this .reg file zipped: www.softsphere.com/files/force_hips.zip
     
  14. Ilya Rabinovich

    Ilya Rabinovich Developer

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Posts:
    1,543
    Yes.

    Just install overtop. Or use regular internal updater. Just to mention- if you have GiveAway 2.56 version, 3.0 is incompatible with its registration system.

    Yes, they are totally compatible.
     
  15. DraghoneoxpaR

    DraghoneoxpaR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Posts:
    13
    Location:
    Turkiye
    Hello.

    Is the firewall version the same as the hips version? if not what is the difference? o_O
     
  16. Ilya Rabinovich

    Ilya Rabinovich Developer

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Posts:
    1,543
    Yes, that could be possible if malware generates tons of system calls when blocked. But, anyway, I'd like to take a look at the sample.
     
  17. Ilya Rabinovich

    Ilya Rabinovich Developer

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Posts:
    1,543
    Binary, they are the same. The difference is that HIPS edition (not version, but edition!) do not control both Inbound and Outbound connections. You can switch it on and off with just registry keys modifications.
     
  18. DraghoneoxpaR

    DraghoneoxpaR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Posts:
    13
    Location:
    Turkiye
    Hmm. I see very well. Thank you.
     
  19. lubieplacki

    lubieplacki Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Posts:
    151
    Location:
    Poland
    Great job.
     
  20. Blackcat

    Blackcat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    4,024
    Location:
    Christchurch, UK
    Agree; at least on a number of machines here. The new version of OA, I have found to be a lot lighter than previous versions.
     
  21. dueceswild

    dueceswild Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Posts:
    187
    Runs great here as well. No hiccups as yet; and if they are to be found I'll stumble into them.

    As a side note, nice article AvinashR.
     
  22. AvinashR

    AvinashR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Posts:
    2,063
    Location:
    New Delhi Metallo β-Lactamase 1
    I haven't able to save that sample because of i have reverted my VM machine today after testing thoroughly...At to my surprise no one able to by pass it. :)
     
  23. AvinashR

    AvinashR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Posts:
    2,063
    Location:
    New Delhi Metallo β-Lactamase 1
    Guys you are requested to read my review thoroughly..One of the user said that DW 3 is not working on Detection technology but on prompting technology, but i haven't mentioned anything such on my review. Do you agree with him ?:p
     
  24. BrendanK.

    BrendanK. Guest

    Prompting? If you mean proactive, then yes :)
     
  25. SafetyFirst

    SafetyFirst Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2007
    Posts:
    462
    Guys, can anyone help here, please?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.