COMODO Internet Security 4.0.135239.742 Released

On a 10-scale (10 being perfect) friendliness of Online Armor ~7.5; Defense Wall ~9; Pi ~3.14159

That is untrue. All those tested by AV-C pay for the privilege, but NOT all are in first place. Same is equally true for AV-test.com et alia.

 

I was not talking about AV-test or AV-C, remember those test paid by norton...
Or the virus bulletin, have any sense get the 100% (the 90% of the AV got it every month) stamp in almos all the test, even knowing that we only need to spend 5 minutes finding for the malware that can bypass the AV, Is just marketing, like the ISO 9000 for the companies.

 

It really does not matter if I trust Comodo or not,as I do not use their software.

Some would say that disqualifies me for expressing and opinion.
I say that is not in the Forum rules.

Do you really want to go into the security certs for malware domains,the Ask/resurrected as HopSurf stuff?(there is of course more*)

If you do,I will not bite.
Suffice that you trust them,and I don't.

Maybe you should keep your lovers quarrels on the beloveds forum.

*Do you know Mad Max?

 

Who said that? poor boy are you ok?

By now I still cant love a company/software if you can, I am so sorry for you

 

I wasn't speaking about me personally not being able to run CIS, but the fact it's more advanced than your average payware suite.

I've used Comodo numerous times including the new version because I like to test them, but I wouldn't consider replacing my current solution with it...well not yet anyhow.

 

and what is your current set up trojanhunter?

 

What "facts" are you making that statement on? I wouldn't say that is more advanced for average payware....definitely for most freeware.

 

Hi,

This is my first post on this topic.

I would like to disagree with the statement "It ain't THAT complicated". I would say it is somewhat complicated for an average user. I never tried comodo before because of the test results of the antivirus part, but CIS V4 looks promising (from the youtube video of languy99) and I decided to give it a try. I have installed this in my laptop. Immediately after the install, comodo sandboxed few of the items like syntray, vpnui etc. syntray is a tray utility for an excellent freeware text editor called syn and vpnui is the Cisco VPN client software that I use to connect to my work network. Comodo should not have sandboxed this. May be comodo's white list has to grow. I can take actions on these sandboxed items, since I know what each component is doing. However, my wife doesn't know anything about these components and if she uses my laptop, she need to call me for every comodo's popup. I don't know how many calls she need.

Having said that, I still love CIS V4 and I continue to use it on my laptop. I have immunet protect also running along with CIS. Comodo has to improve before I start using it on my desktop.

Thanks,
Balaji.

 

Kaspersky internet security 2010 currently

 

CIS4 does work much better on Windows 7 64-bit. Running it now and like how it handles things.

 

You are not alone on this

 

yup same here. all running well here too.

 

is there the buffer underunn feature included?

thanks
does the free firewall include the memory firewall , the anti buffer underunn feature?

 

Haha! Windows XP was just a big mess though.

 

Nonsense! Each tested program pays its own way. Norton does NOT pay for any products tested except its own.

If you persist in posting out & out nonsense, that's why Wilders has an IGNORE button.

I have read your other posts. Outside of this Comodo thread, your other posts are well thought out. In this thread, you seem to be letting your fanship of Comodo overtake your otherwise good judgment.

In point of fact, I basically like what Comodo is trying to accomplish, but I won't touch their products for one main reason -- the aggressive fan-boyism of their forum, and the rant-posts by people from that forum who chose to afflict Wilders forum with their rants.

 

Re: is there the buffer underunn feature included?

The firewall or CIS?

 

There is a big difference between AVC where all the vendors paid for be tested and when norton or any other pays an "unknow" company for test their AV against other AV's, this is what I was saying, do you see the difference?

Could you tell me where I seem a Comodo fan? I have been criticizing them in most of my posts here and also in their forum:
http://forums.comodo.com/news-annou...ign-in-v4-vulnerable-by-default-t52440.0.html
http://forums.comodo.com/news-annou...sters-doing-seriously-their-job-t52461.0.html
https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showpost.php?p=1634339&postcount=115
I have made more than 15 posts in comodo forum since the final v4 was release and none of them has been for say something good about comodo.

 

It always makes me laugh when I see someone jump on the computer and really go to town, they'll fly through this app and that app, download and upload, extract and set up God knows what in the blink of an eye and never ask a question one. Then you show (or even mention) PC security, or God forbid Comodo, and their eyes glaze over they start to drool and their pulse.... well you get the point. I'm not computer genius by any means but if you aren't willing to spend a few minutes learning how to prevent PC meltdown I don't know what to tell you. I don't want software that requires a degree to understand, but I don't want "PC security for dummies" either.

All this being said, I appreciate your viewpoint and a non-user can make very valid points as well. As with anything else, sometimes we can't see the forest for the trees.

 

Okay -- next time try be a little more precise. It sounded like you were bad-mouthing ALL AV tests. Some are good. Some are questionable -- I can agree with that, but not as a basis for bad-mouthing Norton, or any other particular AV product.

Okay, I stand corrected. I overlooked that Wilders post of yours. As to your Comodo posts -- I don't visit there very often any more -- unless I am doing penance for some truly horrible sin.

 

Very well,thank you,And You?

You can love anything you want too.(can we even choose what we love??)
But in a open democratic Forum,you can not expect all others to necessarily love it as much as you do.

You came complaining about their current release.
Then you are angry when other people do not praise Comodo.

You are acting like a high-school boy who runs to his buddies with his girlfriend problems,then wants to fight when some of them tell him she is no good.

 

Where I have written that comodo is the best and bla bla bla and I love them?
But dont worry I dont care which software do you love xD

Where am I angry? please tell me because I think that you are reading a different forum, I just asked you why you didnt trust in comodo...

So please stop to make up things that only are in your head

 

And you have the last word.

regards,
ratwing

 

Please dont be angry I think that we had a big misunderstanding here, my english is not perfect and sometimes I can be a bit "basic" when I write.

 

Not at all. Absolutely no hard feelings.

If we all agreed about software,the "What is your security setup these days?" thread would not be ten miles long.

You English is very good by the way.

 

Hmm... this is a weird one... why is Windows FW still enabled with CIS4 installed?