Sync issues in Outlook

Discussion in 'ESET NOD32 Antivirus' started by chrisf, May 20, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Wensonkan

    Wensonkan Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Posts:
    9
    ... to uncheck the "Integrate into Microsoft Outlook" option ... which isn't a solution ... shaun
     
  2. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,456
    We can make a special dll for you to test. The dll would have writing of all added message properties to messages on the server enabled. Currently they are added only on the client because of synchronization performance.
     
  3. gmiest

    gmiest Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Posts:
    43
    So that's why everyone has been complaining about receiving countless sync issues for the last few days! We have Outlook 2007 clients with an Exchange 2007 server. I have just pushed out a config change using the "Disable checking upon Inbox content change" policy item. Hopefully that will fix the issue for now.

    Any update on this?
     
  4. YaddaMinski

    YaddaMinski Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Posts:
    28
    Outlook is crap and so is Exchange. Lock in for corps because of dumb IS Managers and support companies. Does anyone use Open Xchange?
     
  5. YaddaMinski

    YaddaMinski Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Posts:
    28

    That means ESET will not scan for viruses in the INBOX. Not good.
     
  6. GAN

    GAN Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2007
    Posts:
    355
    Maybe it would be better to post in another forum if you want to discuss Open Xchange or express you personal opinion about outlook/exchange. This thread is about sync issues in outlook.
     
  7. gmiest

    gmiest Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Posts:
    43
  8. rockshox

    rockshox Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2009
    Posts:
    261
    gmiest - Changing the "Disable on in-box change" will not fix the issue. I've tried every combination of settings in ESET to fix this issue with Cached Exchange Mode. The only thing that fixes it completely is to uncheck the options "Integrate into Microsoft Outlook".

    Marcos mentioned a DLL that changes the way message headers are written that sounds like it could be a possible fix. Unfortunately I cannot test on my live Exchange server. Has anyone else tested this DLL?
     
  9. gmiest

    gmiest Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Posts:
    43
    Is there any update on this?
     
  10. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,456
    PM sent. Please let me know about the result.
     
  11. PfrancoIT

    PfrancoIT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2010
    Posts:
    2
    As opposed to comprimising the scan of the mail VIA
    I have found the following solution to work without comprimising the scans of incoming and outgoing mail. I have found this to be effective on 74 workstations over 4 Subnets (locations).

    Advanced Setup>Email client protection

    Append tag messages to recieved email:
    To Infected Email Only
    Append tag messages to sent email:
    To Infected Email Only

    This will still scan all the mail and it will only append ESET tags to the infected emails... Ideally I think people like seeing the mail was scanned when they recieve it as it makes them feel all fuzzy but I believe this is the next best soloution.

    Running
    Exchange 2007
    SBS 2008
    Eset Smart Security Business Edition V4 4.0.474.0
    Outlook 2007
    WinXP Pro SP 3
    Vista Business SP 2



    I also wanted to point out that fact that this seems to be an when using Outlook in Cached mode.
    In fact I have tested on several workstations randomly around the office.
    I can confirm that if you take Outlook out of cached mode this also resolves the problem and all email is still scanned.

    I believe that the scan engine and tagging process is delaying the response back to the server and from the server back to the OST / Outlook client. While it is only in the milisecond range it is enough time to throw off the time between the server and the client. This will generate the error we are seeing and in fact I have seen this using other tools and addins as well. It happens becasue the OST reports a different time than what the server is actually seeing... Literrally in Milliseconds. And this is becasue those milliseconds are being taken and used as ESET does its job. The packet is then sent back to the server and the error is then generated, usually this will come with conflict notifications as well as sync errors.

    Be forewarned that if you remove cached mode from the client computer you are relying soley on the WAN connection each and every time the person opens outlook unless they are on the LAN.
    I can speak from experience that users will complain about "speeds" and they will be referring to the time it takes them to open outlook and start cruising their mail. It is not necessarily the Bandwidth speeds that will affect the slow open times of outlook but instead depends more on the size of the users mailbox and number of emails and folders etc because outlook needs to process all of these items each time it is opened. The bandwidth plays a small role but I have noticed that anything above 2mbps suffices for the data transfer between outlook and exchange, of course higher bandwidth is always better.

    Hope this helps.
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2010
  12. b8plth

    b8plth Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2010
    Posts:
    2
    Hello,

    we have the same Problem. But for me its EVERY mail which produces sync-problems - thats really annoying.

    the modification resolution is:

    14:57:51 Mail Conflict Resolution
    14:57:51 Subject: {SU:}
    14:57:51 EntryID: {CB:70, LPB:0000000069598EB1CB89F54B8DBF3F671241B05707007967CFA52EE6DF43A9896F44CF8038080000B11C4F3200007A20ADD6307AE040874CFFD06102C53E00400A2423DC0000}
    14:57:51 Checking local modifications
    14:57:51 Compare property: 0x007D001F
    14:57:51 Compare named property: Emon Scanner Build
    14:57:51 Compare named property: EsetMessageFlag
    14:57:51 Getting remote properties
    14:57:51 Checking remote modifications
    14:57:51 Compare (conflict) property: 0x007D001F
    14:57:51 Local{SU:Received: from server ([xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]) by

    server ([xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]) with mapi; Thu, 25 Feb 2010

    14:57:18 +0100

    we tried this version 3 an 4 of nod32. its running on windows 7 64 bit

    is there a (new) solution ?

    regards, thomas

    update:
    after disabling the cache mode, the problem is gone, but this is no resolution for our notebook users.
    so again: is there another solution ?
     
  13. rockshox

    rockshox Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2009
    Posts:
    261
    It appears the problem is caused between a conflict with ESET and our Blackberry Enterprise Server both manipulating message headers. The only mailboxes receiving sync issues are users with Blackberry's (in our environment).

    - If I turn the blackberry off completely, the sync issues go away.

    - If I leave Outlook off and send/receive e-mails from the Blackberry everything is fine. No sync issues when Outlook is restarted (until a new e-mail comes in).

    - If Outlook is left open (while a user might be in a meeting, or another building) and e-mails are received/read on the Blackberry device simultaneously, then the sync issues happen every time.

    Is anyone else with these Outlook Sync issues using Blackberry's on the same mailbox?
     
  14. PfrancoIT

    PfrancoIT Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2010
    Posts:
    2
    I have narrowed the issue down for my issues ..

    Anyone who is using a blackberry with Blackberry Enterprise or Professional server is probably having this issue.

    I can telll you that it is in fact an issue between the Blackberry and NOD32.

    The problem is that Exchange Gets the mail and routes it to the Mail client.
    BES also fwd its copy to the users blackberry..
    I believe the sync and conflict occur immediately after the Message hits the blackberry.
    Somewhere there is a header issue between NOD32 Exchange and BES or BPS and the OST.
    Its probably becasue theres no NOD32 headers attached to the Blackberry copy and the sync reports a change not seen server side being submitted back. the Copy of the message that BES and BPS recieve are never sent to the Mailbox itself. They are routed to the blackberry prior to being sent to the mailbox in Exchange.
    Exchange is probaly giving the errors to outlook as a warning of possible Header spoofing etc...


    If youd like to test this for yourself
    Turn off the blackberry of the user you are testing.
    Send a test email and there will be no Sync or conflict issue.

    Anyway this is the point I am at.
    I can confirm at this point if the user that is having this issue also has a Blackberry attached to the BES or BPS and Exchange that Turning of the Blackberry will cease all Sync and Conflict issues.

    After powering the blackberry back on the Sync and conflict issue did not show up for the test message. However after sending another test message the Sync and conflict errors returned.

    I can confirm that with the blackberry Disabled or Powered off that the sync issues do not return.


    This is not a fix simply an observation of trial and error.

    Hope this helps and thoughts would be appreciated as I am working on this error in my own networks and would like to resolve the issue as soon as possible.

    -PfrancoIT

    **Edit - I realize rock posted the same. This message was started about 45 minutes prior to hitting submit as I was working on this at work. He must have posted while I had the reply screen up. Had I seen it I wouldnt have posted and would not have crazy lol.
     
    Last edited: Feb 26, 2010
  15. b8plth

    b8plth Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2010
    Posts:
    2
    hello again,

    i can confirm, that users which are also blackberry-users have this problem.

    is there a solution?

    regards
     
  16. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,456
    Try the following:
    - disable adding signatures to clean emails
    - disable scanning of read emails and leave only scanning of received emails enabled
     
  17. gdonlon

    gdonlon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2010
    Posts:
    12
    I tried this and it does not work for me. I as well believe the issue is in relation to the BES server and Exchange fighting over the modified conflicting headers.

    If I turn off the blackberry device the issue goes away. When I turn the device back on, the issue is back. If I turn off BES services I no longer have the issue. As soon as BES is back up, the issue is present again.

    This is creating a ton of duplicate emails that end up in "conflicts and sync issues" which is tying up our user inboxes pretty badly.
     
  18. rockshox

    rockshox Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2009
    Posts:
    261
    Does not work for me either. I've tried all sorts of combinations of settings for appending tag messages to messages/subjects. Tried turning on the setting "Disable checking upon inbox content change" with the same results. The only things that seem to fix this issue are:

    - Disable ESET's Outlook integration
    - Turn off the Blackberry
    - Uninstall ESET completely
    - Leave Outlook closed at all times
     
  19. gdonlon

    gdonlon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2010
    Posts:
    12
    Is there any further word on this? Is it even a confirmed issue or is it being worked on?

    I am going to call and create a case about this as it is affecting all of our users, I just find it strange that there isn't any further information on how to resolve the issue.

    Right now the way it stands our users inboxes are getting filled up if they have a blackberry and disabling email protection isn't the most proactive thing we should have as a recourse.
     
  20. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,456
    With v. 4.2.35 installed, you can try importing this configuration file that will make email protection write as little information to scanned email as possible. Note that a minimum amount of information must be written to scanned emails so the sync issues may persist and the only way to get rid of them will be disabling email protection.
     
  21. gdonlon

    gdonlon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2010
    Posts:
    12
    Marco's is this on the radar already to be fixed then or should I submit a ticket to ESET about the issue?

    I already have nearly everything turned off without actually turning off the scanner for Outlook at this point. Do I at this point need to go through the channels to get this resolved or is ESET aware of the issue and will be actively working on a fix?
     
  22. rockshox

    rockshox Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2009
    Posts:
    261
    It looks like ERA v4.0.122.0 added a new setting into the Email Client > Setup. I noticed there is now a section labled "Enable resolution of Microsoft Outlook syncronization issues". The default value is 0 which is OFF, and 51 - All On. Does anyone know if this variable is for this issue and how it works?

    ESET_Outlook_Resolution.PNG
     
  23. stickymicky

    stickymicky Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Posts:
    14
    Has anyone got any updates on thiso_O... I to would like to join this group in trying to resolve these annoying sync messages within outlook...
     
  24. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,456
    If messages are accessed from multiple devices it's normal that sync issues occur. When a message has been scanned, certain information about the scan must be written to the message which causes a sync issue when the message is opened from another device.
     
  25. rockshox

    rockshox Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2009
    Posts:
    261
    Marcos - Can you answer my question regarding the ERA setting I mentioned here?

    Thanks!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.