Looks like Kaspersky 2010 has gone gold

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by QBgreen, Jun 20, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Good man.:thumb:
     
  2. gery

    gery Registered Member

    Any info on CPU and RAM usage of KISS 2010 would be much appreciated here.o_O
     
  3. fax

    fax Registered Member

    Very light on RAM and CPU but my old laptop with 1GIG RAM felt it so heavy... that I had to remove it. Didn't have this problem with KIS2009 :(
    A good example on how RAM/CPU sometimes say nothing.

    Fax
     
  4. gery

    gery Registered Member

    last time i had it on my laptop it was very heavy on browsing and the programs responded very slow. I had to remove it.
     
  5. fax

    fax Registered Member

    Exactly... generalised slow down but RAM/CPU was perfectly fine...

    Fax
     
  6. vijayind

    vijayind Registered Member

    Thanks for the update :thumb:
    The household PCs use KIS and I was thinking of moving to 2010. Better wait, else it will the wrong end of the stick from my better half for atleast a week :D
     
  7. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    I have it on 1 desktop and 2 laptops. The laptops would be the issue if there was one. All 3 are lickity split in all areas.
     
  8. kinwolf

    kinwolf Registered Member

    Exactly the same thing here. It complains the key is for the wrong product even though I went form KIS 2009 to KIS2010
     
  9. Xitrum

    Xitrum Registered Member

    Online Armor and Ghost Security Suite can protect any applications at level of a each commandline parameters, like path\applicationname.exe param1 param2... for each application in protection.

    Outpost security suite 2009, KIS2009 do not do that level? How about KIS2010?
     
  10. Coolio10

    Coolio10 Registered Member

    KIS2009 did commandline processing.
     
  11. a320ca

    a320ca Registered Member

    Did you figure out why your scan time was so slow? I might be mistaken, but weren't you having problems with slow scans? This was one reason why I didn't look further into KIS 2010.
     
  12. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    I think it is because I had everything checked and set to high. Took about a hour this time and then changed it to scan only new abd changed files. Working good here now.
     
  13. dawgg

    dawgg Registered Member

    The scan timer's weird and overestimates the scanning time IMO. when I started the full scan on my computer with all settings on max, it said 7hrs, but eventually decreased and completed within 2 and a half.
     
  14. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    I like 2010. dont get me wrong but, if the new Sandbox module doesnt work on 64 bit, take it out. Plain and simple.:thumbd:
     
  15. a320ca

    a320ca Registered Member

    Would you say this is probably the best all in one "suite" for a 32bit system out there now?

    Have you experienced any memory leaks or system slowdowns?

    Thanks. :)
     
  16. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Best? No such thing. But my top 3 are still Kaspersky, Eset and F-Secures new beta.;)
     
  17. a320ca

    a320ca Registered Member

    In that order? BTW, do you run any other security apps with KIS 2010?
     
  18. Julian

    Julian Registered Member

    I have no problems with sandboxed FF 3.5 on Vista 64. The x64 sandbox may be not great but it's the only available one (ZA FF is stupid). And most likely it will also improve.

    The HIPS of KIS 9 on x64 is also one of the best.
     
  19. fax

    fax Registered Member

    Sorry sligtly off topic but triggered my curiosity, why stupid?
    Is it because it only works with IE and FF?

    Running it now and to be honest its the easiest solution I have tried. No complicated settings.. just runs :)

    Fax
     
  20. hawki

    hawki Registered Member

  21. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Lol, do I run any other apps with it, well yes, as of now I do.:argh:
     
  22. a320ca

    a320ca Registered Member

    :D I see.
     
  23. hawki

    hawki Registered Member

  24. Macstorm

    Macstorm Registered Member

  25. G1111

    G1111 Registered Member

    Downloaded KAV 2010 (58.8 MB). Installed over 2009 with no problems. Update did take awhile. Running 25.9 + 4 MB on XP Home SP3. Haven't had any problems so far. Accessed the database and updated signatures. Checking out features.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice