Is Prevx good?

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by truthseeker, Aug 31, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. lordpake

    lordpake Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Posts:
    563
    Location:
    Helsinki ~ European Union
    Little question: how responsive is PrevX viruslab to f/p reports? Just re-installed the CSI and got two very obvious f/p's :)

    One of them involved another security product so I just wonder how fast they usually handle stuff like this.
     
  2. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    As I've said many times before, we are adamantly working on improving support for all of our users and will continue to do so. We were a fraction of the size we are now in 2007 (contrary to some people's belief, we have a LOT more users outside of Wilders and Castlecops ;))

    I generalized the classification of Prevx 3 - it is actually still an anti-malware app, not just anti-virus.

    As for rebuilding from the ground up: retooling is always an important part of software development. Prevx2 was heavy on system resources and that was because of a conceptual break between the drivers and the usermode code. Now, the drivers and usermode code are integrated far tighter, making a much more stable, and much better user experience all around.
     
  3. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    PM me or Marco and we'll have them fixed in minutes, or write a support message and we will also have them fixed in minutes ;)
     
  4. lordpake

    lordpake Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Posts:
    563
    Location:
    Helsinki ~ European Union
    I did write Support Msg via website.
     
  5. truthseeker

    truthseeker Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Posts:
    977
    And what happened? :blink:
     
  6. EraserHW

    EraserHW Malware Expert

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Posts:
    588
    Location:
    Italy
    We fixed it just now? :D :)
     
  7. truthseeker

    truthseeker Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Posts:
    977
    Now that's what I call great service :argh: :thumb:
     
  8. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    Just to give a bit of full disclosure - we've fixed one FP on his system, but there is still some incompatibility with a virtual keyboard component of Kaspersky which it appears to be hiding from the file system. The QA team is installing his exact version and trying to reproduce the problem now.
     
  9. lordpake

    lordpake Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Posts:
    563
    Location:
    Helsinki ~ European Union
    From the reporter's point of view I can confirm that 2 other f/p's have indeed been fixed :)

    The KIS rootkit f/p, which likely is far more complex, remains.
     
  10. EraserHW

    EraserHW Malware Expert

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Posts:
    588
    Location:
    Italy
    Yes it is, indeed :) We're working on it
     
  11. truthseeker

    truthseeker Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Posts:
    977
    I clicked on your link to download the free check.

    But it tries to download a file called:

    23A16531B30F4E7BA326.exe

    Is that your file? If so, I am worried to run a file with such an unusual filename.
     
  12. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    That is our file - sorry for the scare!!

    We are naming it randomly to evade some malware which blocks us when we're named 'PREVXCSIFREE.exe'

    Some infections like XP Antivirus and the Braviax rootkit block us before we even get a chance to run, and, by naming our file randomly, we can completely clean them ;)
     
  13. truthseeker

    truthseeker Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Posts:
    977
    Understood :thumb:

    Ran it and it reported my system clean :)
     
  14. simmikie

    simmikie Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2006
    Posts:
    321
    i should hope so.

    it's good to know that the scope of Prevx protection has not been more narrowly focused.

    thanks for this disclosure. would you be able to say when you able to at least discuss ver3 more openly? or when your organization will begin promoting it? thanks. looking forward to a productive dialog with Prevx once again.


    Mike
     
  15. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    Most definitely - we're deciding on a date for the beginning of the Prevx 3 beta, but it should be anywhere between two weeks from now and a month or so from now. Right now we are still keeping a bit quiet on it, and I honestly don't know exactly when it will start, but I will let everyone here know as soon as we have the code out.
     
  16. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    The Kaspersky incompatibilities should be completely sorted out in version 3.0.0.120.

    You may need to manually download the new version to update it, as ESET is still producing a false positive against us so we can't release it as an update just yet.
     
  17. virtumonde

    virtumonde Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2008
    Posts:
    504
    Sophos Antivirus has a FP on your CSI product reporting it as malware.You can contact them too.
     
  18. lordpake

    lordpake Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Posts:
    563
    Location:
    Helsinki ~ European Union
    Yes. As of 3.0.0.120 all is green in my system.
     
  19. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    Thank you for the confirmation!

    We have also contacted Sophos to fix their FP on us - them and ESET always produce a false positive on every new version of CSI, so, it will just take a couple days to get it all sorted out.
     
  20. lordpake

    lordpake Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Posts:
    563
    Location:
    Helsinki ~ European Union
    Well, it seems I found something else :D

    KIS memory scan with CSI Self Protection enabled leads to BSOD event. At least in my system :D (to others, note that self defence is NOT on by default!)


    I submitted support message, of course, with minidumps from BSOD events and additional info about system/how I can replicate this.
     
  21. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    Hello,
    Thank you again for your information - CSI and Kaspersky definitely don't seem to play too well together on your system! We will be investigating this shortly.

    One interesting thing is that Kaspersky actually refuses to install if it detects CSI on the system, which may mean that they are aware of an incompatibility... however, we will know once we finish the testing on our end.
     
  22. starfish_001

    starfish_001 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Posts:
    1,046

    Never say never but .... I doubt very much that I will pay to update to be able to use version 3 ...... and as version 2 does not work for me and there is no mechanism possible to suspend / reissue a short license.



    once bitten twice shy
     
  23. ako

    ako Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Posts:
    667
    It is nice to see, that finally they are at least talking to us! :thumb:
     
  24. GES/POR

    GES/POR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2006
    Posts:
    1,490
    Location:
    Armacham
    If i manually check for updates it will each time say theres a new version and update but it remains the previous version wich is v3.120
     
  25. Hermescomputers

    Hermescomputers Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Posts:
    1,069
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada, eh?
    Hello all,

    I cant clean up this infection, PREVX CSI detects it and then clean it, only to have it back on every reboots after I scan...

    I disabled the system restore, and nothing... Another issue is what on earth is "Cloaked Malware", as I cant get an MD5 or SHA1 ash code to search online for it all I get is this.... "Cloaked malware" I know it's a root kit being detected but it's unable to clean it...

    Note: PRevx 2.0 (Latest updates ) is also installed on this client PC and is unable to even detect the infection. Also GMER fails to see it, NOD32 3.0 latest and Superantispyware see nothing either....

    Here is the "Failed" successful clean up log:

    Last Scan: Sat 2008-10-04 16:05:34 Eastern Daylight Time. Number of Scans: 5
    H:\WINDOWS\system32\ATIODCLI.exe [PX5: 28A0D25D00582171C24500281FA708008AA90806] Malware Group: Cloaked Malware

    Prevx CSI v3.0.0.120 Cleanup Log for 4/10/2008 16:13
    (0) Remove File: \DosDevices\H:\WINDOWS\system32\ATIODCLI.exe

    Cleanup Complete
    =====================================


    Here is a nice pic:
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Oct 4, 2008
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.