AV-comparatives proactive test predictions

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by risl, Nov 13, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    Drweb has, I think we can be sure of this.

    Also avira
     
  2. JerryM

    JerryM Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2003
    Posts:
    4,306
    I'm surprised at F-Secure, which is one of my favorites.
    Agree that AVG has made some very good strides in the last couple of years.
    Jerry
     
  3. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    I think F-Secure's "Standard" rating is more due to FPs than actual proactive protection numbers....:)
     
  4. MalwareDie

    MalwareDie Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Posts:
    500
    I wonder if Fortinet was penalized for too many fp's even though the heuristics were turned off lol... or was it because it scored too low.
     
  5. tec505

    tec505 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2006
    Posts:
    284
    Location:
    Romulus, class M planet
    Please can anyone tell me where can I find these results?

    Thanks
    Mike
     
  6. ggf31416

    ggf31416 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Posts:
    313
    Location:
    Uruguay
    This time the test used sampled obtained only 3 weeks after the tests, not 3 months. That explains some of the "too good to be true" results.
     
  7. eBBox

    eBBox Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Posts:
    482
    Location:
    Aalborg, Denmark
    The page just says "comming soon" when I go there :mad:
     
  8. LowWaterMark

    LowWaterMark Administrator

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Posts:
    18,286
    Location:
    New England
    It's just a summary table graphic at this moment. Start at their main page; click the bold blue Comparatives link in the center; scroll down a little to find the sentence "To get an overview of the comparatives, we summarized them in tables. You can find them here." Click the link on the word "here".
     
  9. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    Kudos to Eset and Kaspersky. In a round robin fight, a good betting man would wager these are the 2 that would be left standing in the end.
     
  10. tec505

    tec505 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2006
    Posts:
    284
    Location:
    Romulus, class M planet

    Found.

    Thank U.

    Mike
     
  11. Thankful

    Thankful Savings Monitor

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2005
    Posts:
    6,871
    Location:
    New York City
    Thanks to IBK and his team for the hard work they put in.
    Interesting that Microsoft is becoming a player in the AV area (Advanced).
     
  12. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    Yes, but its not all that surprising for what money can buy
     
  13. Steel

    Steel Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Posts:
    219
    Still the version 2.7 was tested. Whether the new version V 3 would topping the actual result of V. 2.7 ?
     
  14. tec505

    tec505 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2006
    Posts:
    284
    Location:
    Romulus, class M planet
    1st of all I would thank IBK and his team for doing these tests, which are extremely important.

    2nd I agree with Thankful: Microsoft will be great and may be (or really) some small players could declare bankrupt!! :eek:

    Mike
     
  15. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,639
    Its nice to see Kaspersky having excellent heuristics. Good job to them.

    And thanks to IBK for doing these tests.
     
  16. Sjoeii

    Sjoeii Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Posts:
    1,240
    Location:
    52?18'51.59"N + 4?56'32.13"O
    Correct!!!:thumb:
     
  17. wir.sing

    wir.sing Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2006
    Posts:
    60
    Leaving out FP's what percentage is required to score an Advanced+ and just a "normal" Advanced?
     
  18. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,891
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    40,0%
     
  19. Sjoeii

    Sjoeii Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Posts:
    1,240
    Location:
    52?18'51.59"N + 4?56'32.13"O
    Than some of us have made some great improvements
     
  20. Diver

    Diver Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    Posts:
    1,444
    Location:
    Deep Underwater
    IMO, this test is obsolete. The next phase of malware detection will be behavior based. Products like Symantec Endpoint 11 or Threatfire in combination with the right signatufe based AV are likely to be the standout performers.
     
  21. pykko

    pykko Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Posts:
    2,236
    Location:
    Romania...and walking to heaven
    hmm.... strange Avira has again many FPs. I've spotted a decrease in their number on my own experience, but who knows... o_O
    1 December is the big date, isn't it ? :D
     
  22. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    maybe drweb will get close to this advanced plus! Detection target but lowered for fps

    Has 40 percent always been the target for the top rating?
     
  23. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,891
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    yes, always
     
  24. MaB69

    MaB69 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2005
    Posts:
    540
    Location:
    Paris
    Excellent remark,

    Please IBK what version of the search engine was installed : version in use when you made the test or the version downloaded with the three months old definitions ?

    Thank you for all your work.

    Regards,

    MaB

    PS : i'm not an Antivir Fanboy :D
     
  25. MalwareDie

    MalwareDie Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Posts:
    500
    Avira needs to fix the html heuristic or their product will always be penalized for too many fp's. Every fp I've had in a while are all from the html heuristic.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.