Will the Eset be going to compensate for his users?

ESET Australia offers a free ESS upgrade for local users, but their website says they don't have an upgrade path from ESET yet. Whatever, it's not happening. I suppose it could be marketing hype, but it will do them a lot of damage if it is.

 

In the UK there is a link: https://secure.eset.co.uk/order/migratelicence.asp
which allows users to upgrade their existing AV licence to Full Suite pro-rota.

I must admit though that I am giving due consideration to reverting back to 2.7 if v3 does not become more bug free and compatible with other security products.

 

One would hope that market rollout strategies (pricing, upgrade paths, etc.) are fully developed before the product rollout actually happens. It seems a bit fragmented in this case.....

Blue

 

Will it be that we are going to have an official word of the Mr Ayreh Goretsky?


It be which space at least to clean the image what they transmitted even if light that to a new design of his products?


Will they be they able of surprising us still?

 

They haven't lost me, either, because I believe it to be solid piece of code... in its guts. Just some peripheral bugs that need ironing out still exist.

One thing I've noticed is that V.3 uses about 5 more meg of RAM and I wonder what that is being used for (?).

It also scans at the now commonly reported rate of ~50% of processor usage BUT the scan is one-half the time it used to take with V. 2.7.


|||

 

Friends dont let friends use ESET 3.0. I'm trying to figure out how to get a refund. Any ideas.

 

Save your setup .exe and then install Norton for a spin. You'll be back.

 

Unless it is mere sarcasm you can search on ESET website and it is listed under 'returns policy' within Terms & Conditions of Trading.

 

This is too funny.



Personally I agree they put this out a little too soon, but that is what happens with any company who are on deadlines and dont want to look like fools and miss their deadlines.


There is probably this huge argument going on inside the company on whether or not they put this out too soon.



Yeah I have problems with 3.0 it just crashes my system when I use my browser.

So I just sent in the error to them and went back to 2.7. If it were a problem I could deal with then I would just send the error reports in to them so they know what they are dealing with and know what to fix.


IF you want this to be a good software, if your computer can operate with it on it and it doesnt pose a security threat, keep it there if its not working all that well and keep sending the error reports in and the software will get very good quick.


And for the new people who just bought 3.0, 2.7 is an amazing piece of software and using that in the time being will not hurt you in the least.

 

I haven't tried it yet; I've only read through other's experience. Nod32 2.7 was purchased because of unique features not offered by anyone else. From what I read, some of those unique features have been programmed out to the point that other than 2.7, there is still nothing with the unique features I want.

I assume at some point in time 2.7 will be discontinued and users will be expected to "upgrade" to version 3. Whether I will or not will depend on whether version 3 is at least equal to 2.7. Otherwise, without the option available on the market now offered by 2.7, I'd likely rely strictly on scanning. Never again will I permit a real-time monitor to noticeably bog down my system.

I'm not trying to be negative, but I do sincerely hope Eset recognizes the unique position they hold within the anti-virus community, and wouldn't give that position up for anything.

 

Here's one here.

Not a single problem to date and I've had it installed since the 5th.

Saying that, I had no problems with the beta either for the couple of weeks I tried it.

Version 2.7 is still fully supported so for those who are not totally happy and experiencing problems with V3 they could revert back to 2.7 (which was and still is a quality product)