Update 2431 and archives

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by Kosak, Aug 1, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Kosak

    Kosak Registered Member

    Before update 2431 with upgrade archive module NOD32 detects in one .zip file this: probably variant of Win32/Small trojan. After this update NOD32 cannot test this file and write this: unpack error.

    I tried test file in archive .zip and then unzip as .exeo_O


    note: 15.07.2007 NOD32 cannot test this file, but 01.08.2007 NOD32 could test it and this update changed it back.
     
    Last edited: Aug 2, 2007
  2. Kosak

    Kosak Registered Member

    What do you think, where is the problem? Will ESET solve it?
     
  3. Seer

    Seer Registered Member

    Have you tried the same with 2434?
     
  4. Kosak

    Kosak Registered Member

    of course
     
  5. Seer

    Seer Registered Member

    Well, I don't allow my NOD to update automatically, I prefer to do it manually. So I have noticed that there was an update for advanced heuristics in 2432. This "probably variant" is detected heuristically. Perhaps an ESET official would clear this up for us... :)
     
  6. Kosak

    Kosak Registered Member

    This problem isn't in heuristic module. NOD32 cannot open and test this file in .zip archive and extracted with extension .exe:(
     
  7. cupez80

    cupez80 Registered Member

    have you send .zip file to ESEt ? it could be FP.
     
  8. Kosak

    Kosak Registered Member

    I sent this sample to ESET at 24th July with another files. I attached results from http://www.virustotal.com/


    This sample was marked as TR/Crypt.FSPM.Gen (Avira) = Trojan.Small.APJ (BitDefender). At that time NOD32 wrote unpack error, too. It changed to heuristic detection and came back. (but this I wrote)
     
  9. Kosak

    Kosak Registered Member

    Today ESET upgrade archive module, but my problem is still actual.:(
     
  10. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    The archive is being looked at, please hold on.
     
  11. ugly

    ugly Registered Member

    Some time ago I sent a trojan to ESET that is still not detected.
    On virustotal today :

    removed attachment....Bubba

    Is this an archive problem too ?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 5, 2007
  12. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    It's a password protected archive, the file(s) inside are usually detected.
     
  13. ugly

    ugly Registered Member

    No , it is not password protected. o_O
    Others are detecting it without any problems.(DNSChanger)
     
  14. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    These usually contain password protected archives, I'm very doubtful NOD32 would give you that message otherwise.
     
  15. ugly

    ugly Registered Member

    I get that message on virustotal only.
    If I scan that file with NOD32 it founds nothing.
    Anyway I'll resend that to ESET and perhaps it will finally get fixed.
     
  16. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    As I said, the archive contains other password protected archives:
     

    Attached Files:

    • scan.jpg
      scan.jpg
      File size:
      26.8 KB
      Views:
      389
  17. ugly

    ugly Registered Member

    Suppose you are right I still have a very big question.
    How do others manage to scan inside those protected archives and detect that threat o_O .
     
  18. flyrfan111

    flyrfan111 Registered Member

    Either guess/know the password or brute force/dictionary it.
     
  19. ugly

    ugly Registered Member

    :eek:
    For sure nothing like that.:p
     
  20. ugly

    ugly Registered Member

    No answer o_O o_O o_O
     
  21. pykko

    pykko Registered Member

    they detect the whole package either by heuristics or signatures.
     
  22. Kosak

    Kosak Registered Member

    Last edited: Aug 6, 2007
  23. pykko

    pykko Registered Member

  24. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    The file was patched fsg so there's nothing to fix. However, Advanced heuristics was able to emulate the code so if it was malicious AH would have caught it.
     
  25. Kosak

    Kosak Registered Member

    But before this update NOD32 could test that file. I think that problem is certainly in archive module.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice