Quit Antivir 4 Avast, have question

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Kees1958, Jul 14, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Kees1958

    Kees1958 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Posts:
    5,857
    Dear members,

    Although Antivir scores higher in comparatives testing, specially for worms, backdoors and trojans than Avast, I was fed up with the long and lacking virus definitions update.

    I have switched to Avast and have a queston on the VRDB protection mechanismen. According to the help Vrius Recorvery Data Base is a sort of last life line when cleaning fails. It keeps three version of the files.

    - What is the scope of the data base (critical systems files only or all)?
    - How does it work (does it keep actual copies, where or is it based on
    some sort of integrity counting to re-calculate the original values of
    the infected parts)?

    Regards Kees
     
  2. RejZoR

    RejZoR Lurker

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    6,426
    VRDB storage scope is limited to executable files (EXE, COM, CMD etc) and it doesn't store complete files, just parts of them and integrity info (whats stored exactly knows only ALWIL team). Typical VRDB database size is usually around 15-20MB in size. It's suppose to be fairly efficient for older file infectors but i'm not sure if it fares too well to current file infectors (like Win32:polip for example).
     
  3. Kees1958

    Kees1958 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Posts:
    5,857
    Thx a lot :thumb:
     
  4. the Tester

    the Tester Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Posts:
    2,854
    Location:
    The Gateway to the Blue Hills,WI.
    I switched from AntiVir PE Classic to Avast Home for the same reason.
    I have been very happy with how Avast handles updates.
     
  5. LoneWolf

    LoneWolf Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Posts:
    3,819
    Quite happy with Avast myself.
    detection and updates. :thumb:
    The Avast forum is very helpful as well.
    http://forum.avast.com/
    Tried many AV's but I believe i'll stick with Avast for a while. :D
     
  6. Kerodo

    Kerodo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2004
    Posts:
    8,014
    Shame that the poor update servers and that nag screen ruin an otherwise fine free product. I use Avast for similar reasons myself and am totally satisfied as well..
     
  7. Kees1958

    Kees1958 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Posts:
    5,857
    Thx,

    Avast looks a nice complete free AV. Because it scans a lot of threatgates, I have set theregular shield only to check at writes (the performance option as Avast mentiones this).

    So on the PC of my wife now is running Avast free, A2 IDS (paid), DefenseWall (paid).

    I decided to give AOL's Active Virus Shield (Kapersky free with less options) a try on my son's PC, so he is running AVS free, CyberHawk Pro, GeSWall Pro.

    Thansk for the info. I know Avast will stay on my wife's computer, see how obtainable the updates of AVS are in the next week.
     
  8. zapjb

    zapjb Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2005
    Posts:
    5,675
    Location:
    USA still the best. But barely.
    I have Avast for Linux. Like it. But the GUI is awful. And the updates take forever.

    Totally opposite of my experience with Avast for Windows.

    Weird huh?
     
  9. FastGame

    FastGame Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2005
    Posts:
    715
    Location:
    Blasters worm farm
    I haven't tried all the Linux AV's but yes they are not the same looks wise, they don't have incremental updates.

    I also had big update problem with AntiVir, I use Avast in both Windows and Linux.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.