Zone Alarm Firewall vs. McAfee Firewall

Discussion in 'other firewalls' started by thebigdintx, Nov 7, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. thebigdintx

    thebigdintx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2005
    Posts:
    337
    Location:
    Dallas, Texas
    I have been using the free version of the Zone Alarm firewall for some time, and like it. However, I can now get the paid version of the McAfee Firewall for free through my Verizon with MSN Premium account. Which would be better, the free version of zone alarm firewall, or the paid version of mcafee firewall which I can get for free?
     
  2. Joliet Jake

    Joliet Jake Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Posts:
    911
    Location:
    Scotland
    I had McAfee firefall free with AOL and I found it slow.
    Also, when it updated itself it blocked an application I had made a rule for (allowing inbound and outbound) and I couldn't get it to work even after making a new rule.

    Uninstalled and use Filsclab now.
     
  3. CrazyM

    CrazyM Firewall Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    2,428
    Location:
    BC, Canada
  4. chiawaikian

    chiawaikian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Posts:
    46
    According to efficiency and security, ZoneAlarm is better than McAfee.
     
  5. thebigdintx

    thebigdintx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2005
    Posts:
    337
    Location:
    Dallas, Texas
    Thanks for the info. Seems they are both real good, and there are arguments for both of them. The one thing I found out which may make me change from Zone Alarm to McAfee is the fact that the McAfee Firewall is one of the 3 software Firewalls certified by the ICSA according to a post in one of the threads listed by CrazyM. All else being equal, that fact seems to put the McAfee one over the top.
     
  6. hollywoodpc

    hollywoodpc Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Posts:
    1,325
    thebigdintx .
    I must say that you think very well . It is refreshing to see someone using the professional info to make an informed decision . I know this is not a thread to knock anyone or give praise but , I felt you deserved it . I have used ZAP but , not McAfee . You deciding what puts one over the other by a professional rating is excellent . Hope it works for you and again , great job handling it the way you did . I would be curious as to how good it is after you use it awhile . I am not planning on switching from mine but , I never tested McAfee . Hope you will report on it later .
    Oh , are you sure it is the paid version ? It might be a stripped down version . I do not know , that is why I ask . Thanks and good luck .
     
  7. unhappy_viewer

    unhappy_viewer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Posts:
    259
    CA's eTrust EZ Firewall uses the firewall engine from ZA, so technically, ZA is also ICSA certified. Its whether the companies choose to submit it to ICSA to get certified. CA decided to jump ahead instead of Zone Labs and send it for the test to try to increase their market share. I am sure if other firewall products like Outpost submits to ICSA, they would pass too.

    http://forum.zonelabs.org/zonelabs/board/message?board.id=Off-Topic&message.id=7318#M7318
     
  8. mata7

    mata7 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Posts:
    635
    Location:
    Mississauga, Canada
    the only think that i hate about MPFirewall is that have to use the Security Center that is a reason why i will never use it, but is a nice fwall
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.