[Bug/Work Around] Exchange 2010 Remote Management

Discussion in 'Other ESET Home Products Beta' started by Geosoft, Mar 19, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Geosoft

    Geosoft Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2009
    Posts:
    270
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Hey All,

    Just in case someone else encounters this problem, I thought I would document it here and hopefully someone from ESET will be able to provide a fix.

    I was having problems using remote management of the Exchange 2010 console with access denied messages related to kerberos. When I excluded the IP Address of the exchange server in ESET's Protocol Filtering.

    This behaviour was not exhibited in version 4, just version 5.
     
  2. Geosoft

    Geosoft Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2009
    Posts:
    270
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    This problem still exists in the Release Candidate.
     
  3. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,456
    I've reproduced the issue and created the necessary logs for the developers.

    Update:
    the problem is in badly coded multipart responses, apparently MS coders did not adhere to RFC standards (http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc1341/7_2_Multipart.html). There's extra space in the boundary and "-- Encrypted Boundary--" is ended incorrectly as well (it's not preceded by 0x0D 0x0A).
    We'll make a workaround for this to the Internet protection module so that the http communication works fine even in cases like this.
     
    Last edited: May 11, 2012
  4. Geosoft

    Geosoft Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2009
    Posts:
    270
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Oh look, Microsoft not adhering to standards! That's a first. /sarcasm

    Thanks for the update Marcos.
     
  5. Geosoft

    Geosoft Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2009
    Posts:
    270
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Hi Marcos,

    Sadly, the problem still exists in RTW.
     
  6. rklarr

    rklarr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2007
    Posts:
    6
    Any word on the workaround? That big red "X" and the words "NON FUNCTIONAL" are making people nervous.

    Headzup to others looking for wisdom on the issue: my remote management consoles are not affected--just the tools on the server itself. So one workaround is to install mgmt tools on your PC. ;)
     
  7. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,456
    It should work with the Internet protection module 1041 currently available on pre-release servers.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.