Snopes infected?

Discussion in 'ESET NOD32 Antivirus' started by PaulB2005, Dec 16, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. PaulB2005

    PaulB2005 Registered Member

    Yesterday and today i visited Snopes and recieved (edited links - correct links can be sent via PM if a Mod or Staff requires them)

    15/12/2009 08:55:44 HTTP filter file http://xxxuvbcmxxx.com/xxx/trest10....0006R517c6c1810aT86cbced5201l0809K7460664f317 JS/Exploit.Pdfka.ASD trojan connection terminated - quarantined Paul-PC\Paul Threat was detected upon access to web by the application: C:\Program Files\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe

    16/12/2009 08:32:30 HTTP filter file http://xxxeeklgxxx.com/xxx/TREST10....0006Rf919303b10aT86c41ac0201l0809K4afa19fd317 JS/Exploit.Pdfka.ASD trojan connection terminated - quarantined Paul-PC\Paul Threat was detected upon access to web by the application: C:\Program Files\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe

    when visiting a story in the What's New section.

    I've emailed Snopes but wondered if ESET can confirm this?
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2009
  2. Capp

    Capp Registered Member

    Maybe it has to do with this:



    Adobe Warns of Reader, Acrobat attack in the wild
     
  3. PaulB2005

    PaulB2005 Registered Member

    Snopes response

     
  4. SmackyTheFrog

    SmackyTheFrog Registered Member

  5. siljaline

    siljaline Registered Member

    My guess is that Snopes were hit by a third party malvetising ad.

    What I would like to know is were the information stating that the ad in question was removed from "rotation" was obtained?

    What is the guarantee that the same ad will not reappear and infect more users ?
     
  6. SmackyTheFrog

    SmackyTheFrog Registered Member

    There's never a real guarantee. They contact the ad service and make sure that specific one gets pulled out of rotation, but so much ad content is outsourced to very shady providers that it is a matter of hours before another one malicious one makes it in the rotation and starts hitting people again.
     
  7. siljaline

    siljaline Registered Member

    :thumb:
    This is a given, with an oft-visited site such as Snopes who makes their real revenue from advertising. A HOSTS File would help those that do not already use one.

    Snopes replied to me as follows:
    This would appear to me to be a rather rubber-stamp reply.
    Snopes users should be cautioned on clicking third-party ads while visiting the site.
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2009
  8. Carbonyl

    Carbonyl Registered Member

    Good advice, but all visitors to the site should be forewarned: You do not need to click on any ad for malvertisement to launch it's attack. Simply visiting the Snopes page hosting the ad (i.e. the front page, what's new page, etc.), will be enough for the attack to launch.

    Snopes' pass-the-blame attitude in this is deplorable, in my opinion. As the owners and operators of the page in question, they have a responsibility to keep their ads clean and safe. Anything less is negligence.

    On the other hand, ++ to ESET for recognizing and stopping the attack before it could get its hooks into the OP!
     
  9. siljaline

    siljaline Registered Member

    I am hoping the Snopes folks have read this and are taking this somewhat seriously. Meanwhile, surf safe. Think before you click :thumb:
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2009
  10. PaulB2005

    PaulB2005 Registered Member

    The alert would appear when the advert LOADED on the Snopes page. NOT when the advert was clicked on. Actually i don't know about the last part because i didn't click on an advert to find out.

    Exactly what happened, as per my opening post.
     
  11. siljaline

    siljaline Registered Member

    I can only advise as to what Snopes was quoted to in several previous replies in this thread, visit the site at your own risk and peril if you feel it is a security risk for your Browsing experience.
     
  12. jimwillsher

    jimwillsher Registered Member

  13. siljaline

    siljaline Registered Member

    Last edited: Dec 18, 2009
  14. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Some off topic comparison posts not requiring support removed.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice