April VB100 results

The April VB100 results have been out, with testing on a XP Pro SP3 bed. Was surprised to see that both Rising and Twister allowed themselves to be tested; both failed, of course, with Twisters results being especially poor.

 

Re: AV Comparatives April Results

Could you please change the name of your thread or ask a mod to change it, since Av-Comparatives is a branch of it's own, it doesn't relate to VB100.

 

So the VB100 results are a secret?

 

Hopefully, a member who recalls his username and password will be kind
enough to list the results.

 

Products that failed the VB100 April 2009 test:

http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/archive/results?display=summary

 

Failure reason:
Filseclab: 53 wildlist misses, 21 false positives.
Rising: 10 false positives.

Just need to register (free).

 

Missing 53 VB100 samples is quite an achievement However overshadowed by Finport of course
Updated my list above.

 

From those results it looks like:
Rising failed not because of missed detections but false positives.
That's not necessarily a bad result for Rising IMO.

 

Basically, everyone that should have passed, passed. But you can't get further details of the results without paying a subscription (which sucks in my opinion, but they have to make money). Registering tells you who passed/failed and by how much.

 

thats nothing lol
Finport
Failure reason: 266 wildlist misses, 12 false positives

 

Twister may have fail because of the non-use of FDDS, I'm not sure of how it was tested so i cant say however. FP's Should have been much higher with FDDS on Full/Med.

 

I thought these tests were completely outdated?

 

I hate to register at sites. Too many sites demand that these days, its not "user friendly".. I hope VB100 remove the need to register..

 

after years of an existence?

 

http://www.bugmenot.com/