Home security giant ADT says it was hacked

Discussion in 'other security issues & news' started by Malcontent, Aug 8, 2024.

  1. Malcontent

    Malcontent Registered Member

    Home security giant ADT says it was hacked

     
  2. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Probably got everyone's alarm codes. I would change mine if I used this service. They more I see of these the more I never want to give anyone any of my information ever again.
     
  3. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    LOL, didn't even think of that. :eek:

    The question is, how are all of these companies getting hacked? Bad security practices, or are the current security tools not good enough?
     
  4. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Most likely, but probably some of both.
     
  5. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    Too bad that companies are not required to disclose this info. I would like to know exactly what type of security software they were using. That's why I loved it that everyone knew that CrowdStrike Falcon was the cause of the major outage that cost companies $5 billion, they couldn't hide it.
     
  6. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    That would be really helpful to the bad guys too... :eek:
     
  7. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    LOL good point, probably not a good idea. But what I meant is that if security tools failed to protect companies, they should be hold accountable. Let's say Win Defender failed to protect against a major ransomware attack, should this be kept a secret, so that other companies will get hacked too? And I'm sure not all of these hacks are caused by user error.
     
  8. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    No, but 100% are caused by bad guys. I'd like to see greater effort made to find ways to identify and punish then. If they're in a country that won't cooperate, disconnect that country from the internet.
     
  9. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    BTW, turns out that the SEC already requires companies to report hacks, I assume they will then also look into which security tools these companies are using. If it was up to me, I would fine cybersecurity companies who can't protect against certain attacks.

    https://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/cybersecurity-stocks-to-watch-amid-shift-to-ai-cloud.453604/
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2024
  10. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    I still feel we should go after the attacker rather than the atackee (I know it's not a word). Prosecuting the victim will only make nobody want to provide cybersecurity. Cybersecurity companies certainly shouldn't be slack in their efforts, but the bad guys have plenty of incentive and apparently no risk. It's not possible to defend against every attack. Why would they ever give up? They're laughing at all of us.
     
  11. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    I have to disagree, of course attackers will eventually be caught and prosecuted. And you can indeed not protect against everything, but many of the attacks that I read about should have easily been blocked. I think fining them will be an extra incentive for cybersecurity companies to step up their game. See link for an example of what I mean.

    https://arstechnica.com/information...ion-generates-billions-but-is-easy-to-bypass/
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice