I wonder if AI can also fix their horrible website design. I haven't been on CNET for years. And I think this AI stuff is a bad trend. Just about all of the helpdesk ''chat bots'' are dumb as hell and I don't expect AI to improve the quality of articles either.
Chatbots and AI written articles are something else. Chatbots are stupid because they can't respond correctly to human questions. One thing and each of a hundred people will describe/solve it differently. But articles are a compilation/selection of sources where the AI has clearly set frameworks.
techradar etc are the same, i think. Nowadays is quite hard to find "independent" reviews of softwares/hardwares etc, because results are more or less paid.
Yes, I can see why they would like to use AI on certain websites, I just wonder if it will improve quality. A lot of newspaper websites repackage news from other websites anyway, AI will give them a faster way of doing this. A real human would only have to check if everything is correct.
“We didn’t do it in secret,” CNET editor-in-chief Connie Guglielmo told the group. “We did it quietly. Oh, that's ok then
and so do ghacks owned by softonic, other yellowpress to follow (Brandon Eich is NOT CEO of mozilla and Brinkman corrected that article)
