Webroot SecureAnywhere Discussion & Update Thread

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Triple Helix, Jun 6, 2014.

  1. trott3r

    trott3r Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Posts:
    1,283
    Location:
    UK
    With windows update rolling everything into one update do i have to install the MSRT or is their a way to avoid it?

    Running win 7 64bit home prem
     
  2. trott3r

    trott3r Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Posts:
    1,283
    Location:
    UK
    On reflection it might be some of the third party utilites that patch windows.
    One i remember was the evid? patch to open more connections up as service pack 2 on xp reduced the number.
    Allegedly this was because people bought win xp pro instead of the server edition thus costing MS money.
     
  3. m0unds

    m0unds Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2015
    Posts:
    219
    they target specific prevalent pieces of malware with each of those, so it doesn't really hurt anything to let it go.

    relevant msft documentation (select covered families to expand the list of targeted malware):
    hxxps://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/890830/remove-specific-prevalent-malware-with-windows-malicious-software-remo
     
  4. waking

    waking Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2016
    Posts:
    176
    "How the Malicious Software Removal Tool differs from an antivirus product

    The Malicious Software Removal Tool does not replace an antivirus
    product. It is strictly a post-infection removal tool. Therefore, we
    strongly recommend that you install and use an up-to-date antivirus
    product.

    The Malicious Software Removal Tool differs from an antivirus product in
    three key ways:

    - The tool removes malicious software from an already-infected computer.
    Antivirus products block malicious software from running on a computer.
    It is significantly more desirable to block malicious software from
    running on a computer than to remove it after infection.

    - The tool removes only specific prevalent malicious software. Specific
    prevalent malicious software is a small subset of all the malicious
    software that exists today.

    - The tool focuses on the detection and removal of active malicious
    software. Active malicious software is malicious software that is
    currently running on the computer. The tool cannot remove malicious
    software that is not running. However, an antivirus product can perform
    this task."


    https://support.microsoft.com/en-us...-malware-with-windows-malicious-software-remo
     
  5. Dragon1952

    Dragon1952 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2012
    Posts:
    2,470
    Location:
    Hollow Earth - Telos
    The Webroot filtering extension for chrome is showing all sites are suspicious with a Orange Icon.
     
  6. bjm_

    bjm_ Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,457
    Location:
    .
    https://community.webroot.com/t5/Webroot-SecureAnywhere-Antivirus/Outlook-Mail-Suspicious-Site/td-p/327168
     
  7. Triple Helix

    Triple Helix Specialist

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Posts:
    13,275
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Yes they know about and working on it.
     
    Last edited: Aug 21, 2018
  8. bjm_

    bjm_ Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,457
    Location:
    .
    appears to be sorted
    Thanks
     
  9. Triple Helix

    Triple Helix Specialist

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Posts:
    13,275
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Yes I'm seeing the same in most cases but not completely.
     
  10. Triple Helix

    Triple Helix Specialist

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Posts:
    13,275
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    From Webroot:

    I'm not seeing any issues at this time!
     
  11. bjm_

    bjm_ Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,457
    Location:
    .
    Webroot’s Web Shield Filtering Extension -- Chrome
    Version: 1.7.0.23
    Updated: August 22, 2018
    https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/webroot-filtering-extensi/kjeghcllfecehndceplomkocgfbklffd
     
  12. bjm_

    bjm_ Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,457
    Location:
    .
    anyone notice search annotations (Chrome + google search) not rendering for all results.
    3653.png 3652.png
     
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2018
  13. Triple Helix

    Triple Helix Specialist

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Posts:
    13,275
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    No issues here with the latest Chrome or Firefox.

    2018-08-24_17-20-10.png
     
  14. bjm_

    bjm_ Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,457
    Location:
    .
    Okay, must be me.
    Thanks

    Edit:
    After trying to sort my annotations issue thru WebrootSA agent/extension.
    I noticed that my search annotations were showing okay in my Chrome Person 2 profile.
    So, I Reset (Restore settings to original defaults) my Chrome Person 1 and search annotations now render as expected.
    I had to re-do my persistent login cookies + set a few Chrome switches ... no biggy.
     
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2018
  15. bellgamin

    bellgamin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    8,102
    Location:
    Hawaii
    I bought a 1year/3PC subscription to WSA yesterday, via Novum Ovum (my nickname for Newegg.com). WSA is up & running. I am running Panda Free, as well. Between the 2 of them (both are 99.9999% in the cloud), my aging laptop barely notices them. CPU, working set, & I/O total rate are amaaazingly low. The 2 of them together use MUCH fewer resources than the resident AV (EAM) on my other computer - a twin to my aging laptop.

    My theory: Panda has slightly better sigs & a Behavior Blocker (BB gun) of indeterminate effectiveness. WSA has a SUPER BB gun. So I want to see if they play nicely together. So far... grreat!
     
  16. bjm_

    bjm_ Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,457
    Location:
    .
  17. bellgamin

    bellgamin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    8,102
    Location:
    Hawaii
    No. Actually, when I was running only Panda, I used NortonSafeWeb instead of PandaSafeWeb. My browser is Firefox... I also use NoScript, IdontCareAboutCookies, Ublock Origin, & No Coin. Now that I am also running WSA, I have switched from NortonSafeWeb to WebrootFilteringExtension.

    Uhh... why do you ask?
     
  18. bjm_

    bjm_ Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,457
    Location:
    .
    some VT engines (Webroot) detect PandaSafeWeb.exe (PUA/Adware)
     
  19. bellgamin

    bellgamin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    8,102
    Location:
    Hawaii
    Yes, when I installed WSA, it made a bit of a fuss about a couple of Panda files. Understandable. No problem. :isay:
     
  20. Tarnak

    Tarnak Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2007
    Posts:
    5,295
    I have Panda Global Protection installed together with WSA. However, in the last two weeks whenever Panda Global has automatically started to update WSA interferes and causes the Panda update to fail. I have to rerun the Panda Global Protection installer exe to get Panda reinstalled on my system. [I haven't figured out how to stop these PUA detections by WSA from interfering in this update process.]

    From the last WSA scan log, I found what I consider to be False detections by WSA:

    Tue 28-08-2018 22:11:13.0156 Infection detected: c:\windows\temp\7zs87d8cda9\program files\panda security\panda cloud antivirus\tools\pandasecuritytb.exe [SHA256: 7BD01B3E93950E23AE705917E16817586784649E394C99F2B064F837D82F4FEA] [MD5: EBE12D1003B2B3A23351C42436AD2330] [3/00081020] [PUA.Gen]
    Tue 28-08-2018 22:11:13.0156 File blocked in realtime: c:\windows\temp\7zs87d8cda9\program files\panda security\panda cloud antivirus\tools\pandasecuritytb.exe [UniqueID: 3E1BD07B, MD5: EBE12D1003B2B3A23351C42436AD2330, Size: 4575680 bytes] [528416/00000003] [PUA.Gen]
    Tue 28-08-2018 22:11:13.0168 Determination flags modified: c:\windows\temp\7zs87d8cda9\program files\panda security\panda cloud antivirus\tools\pandasecuritytb.exe - UniqueID: 3E1BD07B, MD5: EBE12D1003B2B3A23351C42436AD2330, Size: 4575680 bytes, Flags: 00000020


    Tue 28-08-2018 22:48:03.0396 Infection detected: c:\users\owner\appdata\local\temp\7zsc7ce4db4\program files\panda security\panda cloud antivirus\tools\pandasecuritytb.exe [SHA256: 9FED84AC26B337E477937BE2BE438349D016B3F56B0A30EEF3DEDD0D27A10AB6] [MD5: B72F5D2B3EE95FE59694CB115000E152] [3/00081020] [PUA.Gen]
    Tue 28-08-2018 22:48:03.0396 File blocked in realtime: c:\users\owner\appdata\local\temp\7zsc7ce4db4\program files\panda security\panda cloud antivirus\tools\pandasecuritytb.exe [UniqueID: AC84ED9F, MD5: B72F5D2B3EE95FE59694CB115000E152, Size: 4575704 bytes] [528416/00000003] [PUA.Gen]

    P.S. I have shown in bold for emphasis.
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2018
  21. Triple Helix

    Triple Helix Specialist

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Posts:
    13,275
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Well there not FP's so the best thing you can do is contact Webroot support and ask them what to do! Webroot Customer Service

    2018-08-29_19-35-28.png 2018-08-29_19-37-58.png
     
  22. m0unds

    m0unds Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2015
    Posts:
    219
    does the toolbar ever update, or does it generally remain the same (same hash, etc) at each update? if it's the same, couldn't you just tell WSA to "allow" it, like you would with any other FP? *EDIT* nevermind, didn't realize it was a completely different file between the pair of hashes you mentioned.

    i don't blame them for flagging it as a pua since it's a visicom pua detection (bunch of other vendors also detect it as such), but still, that's gotta be annoying since WSA generally plays nice with other AVs
     
  23. Triple Helix

    Triple Helix Specialist

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Posts:
    13,275
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    AV's are fine but not the PUA's that come with some of them. https://www.google.com/search?q=pandasecuritytb.exe&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2018
  24. Tarnak

    Tarnak Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2007
    Posts:
    5,295
    @Triple Helix, @m0unds

    Whatever! But, I am sure that Webroot and Panda, between them, know the score. I am just "piggy in the middle". All I know, it is not up to me tell Webroot, because they should already know about this problem with their flagging of Panda.
     
  25. Triple Helix

    Triple Helix Specialist

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Posts:
    13,275
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Sorry but your the one complaining so you should ask Webroot Support as I or we can't do anything on here. Also look at the PC count in the above pictures I posted.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.