Ubuntu Snaps. More libraries for the masses?

Discussion in 'all things UNIX' started by Baserk, Apr 15, 2016.

  1. Baserk

    Baserk Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Posts:
    1,321
    Location:
    AmstelodamUM
    'Adding snaps for secure, transactional packages in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS'

    Quite the step from Ubuntu.
    'Every' app/package having it's own libraries, running sandboxed.
    https://insights.ubuntu.com/2016/04/13/snaps-for-classic-ubuntu/
    What's the communis opinio? "Sure, nice and handy!" or "Multi-libraries?->RAGE!"?
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2016
  2. Mrkvonic

    Mrkvonic Linux Systems Expert

    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Posts:
    10,223
    First step toward running on Windows as isolated packages/apps.
    Onion layer of libs, which is why ZFS was mentioned, to save space, but allow versioning.
    This could be a nice set of solutions.
    Mrk
     
  3. oliverjia

    oliverjia Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Posts:
    1,926
    Sounds like a good move. Now I want to try out 16.04 upon its release, rather than wait for 3 more months before I switch to it from 14.04.
     
  4. Amanda

    Amanda Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2013
    Posts:
    2,115
    Location:
    Brasil
    I just switched from Arch to Ubuntu. This idea really sounds good, but what about critical components like drivers or Kernel modules? How would they work with Snaps?
     
  5. summerheat

    summerheat Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2015
    Posts:
    2,199
    :eek: I'm shocked ;) Hadn't you knocked Ubuntu not so long ago?
     
  6. Amanda

    Amanda Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2013
    Posts:
    2,115
    Location:
    Brasil
    I was shocked too for a while, but then I realized I was right all along :argh: I can't use that. They did improve the overall system stability since 2012, but Ubuntu still has problems... system errors, package management errors, dependencies unmet, programs crashing, black screen on boot, etc.

    I'll try Debian Sid now, and if that is also a mess then I'll just go back to Arch.

    My problem with Linux in the past was FGLRX, but now Mesa is making me mad as well. I just opened an issue on VALVe's Github page yesterday regarding an issue with Team Fortress 2 and Mesa/Radeon that happens on all distros with recent Mesa versions.

    Then the Radeon developers (the stack embedded in the Kernel) pushed a commit that makes my screen flicker.... :mad::mad: I can set the power level to High, but then my card consumes full power all the time, which is ridiculous.

    All these problems is what pushes me to Windows sometimes. Microsoft spies, subjugates, and treats users like shyte, but at least I know everything will work if Iinstall Windows.

    Then I'll feel "dirty", regret using it, and come back to Linux. And the cycle starts over.
    And sometimes I do want to try new things, like the new Ubuntu 16.04. But then all Linux's problems start to re-appear, and the cycle keeps moving on :argh:
     
  7. Tyrizian

    Tyrizian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Posts:
    2,839
    Does Ubuntu 16.04 LTS officially release on April 21st?

    I hear rumor of that release date, but can't find anything official.
     
  8. Amanda

    Amanda Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2013
    Posts:
    2,115
    Location:
    Brasil
    news.softpedia.com/news/developer-claims-that-canonical-s-new-snap-format-isn-t-secure-on-ubuntu-desktop-503287.shtml

    For the time being, I recommend people to just avoid it, otherwise we're about to see Linux turn into MacOS and their unsecure similar feature.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.