A new VB100 comparative review is posted: https://www.virusbtn.com/virusbulletin/archive/2014/12/vb201412-comparative Imo good performance results for Avira Free Antivirus, Emsisoft Anti-Malware and Qihoo 360 Internet Security: https://www.virusbtn.com/virusbulletin/archive/2014/12/figures/detection-slowdown-consumer-large.jpg
AVG had some very impressive RAP results, but was this the paid or free version? It doesn't say Free, but maybe it still was?
Avira and Emsisoft as usual. No regrets here..still using Avira in almost every client PC, and every PC I own except the three that are running Emsisoft. Very happy with it as well.
Here also: https://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/latest_comparative/index ----------- https://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/RAP/RAP-quadrant-Jun-Dec14-1200.jpg
RAP results: https://www.virusbtn.com/virusbulletin/archive/2014/12/figures/RAP-table-consumer-large.jpg https://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/archive/test?id=207 https://www.virusbtn.com/virusbulletin/archive/2014/12/vb201412-comparative#id2935283 Avira Free Antivirus = 90,02% Emsisoft Anti-Malware = 86,52% Qihoo 360 Internet Security = 87,94% ---------------------------- AVG= 91,63% .... etc
I know but I was more interested in: https://www.virusbtn.com/virusbulletin/archive/2014/12/figures/detection-slowdown-consumer-large.jpg Detection vs slowdown.
Ok, fixed then = ---------------------------------- Imo, when everybody listens "VB100 test results", mainly is thinking for "protection results", not "performance results".
It seems that the paid version of AVG was tested. However, it is odd to me that a product which is consistently average in most tests turns out a good result on this one. That being said, it is welcome to note that AVG seems to be improving.
