Tor executive director hints at Firefox integration

Discussion in 'privacy technology' started by lotuseclat79, Sep 29, 2014.

  1. lotuseclat79

    lotuseclat79 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Posts:
    5,390
  2. mirimir

    mirimir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Posts:
    9,252
    That's incredible news :thumb:

    I must say, however, that I find the hype about Apple's "NSA-proof" encryption very annoying:
    That's silly, because iCloud backups aren't encrypted, as explained in https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/09/22/apple-data/ (which has its own thread already).
     
  3. noone_particular

    noone_particular Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Posts:
    3,798
    This will not work unless Mozilla financially separates itself from Google. Partnering with FireFox in its present state will be the end of Tor. They'd be much better off partnering with one of the other Gecko browsers that isn't obsessed with advertising revenue or building their own ecosystem.

    edit.
    If this "integration" doesn't produce more relays and exit nodes, all it will do is overload the relays that we have.
     
    Last edited: Sep 29, 2014
  4. Nebulus

    Nebulus Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Posts:
    1,635
    Location:
    European Union
    I agree with you. TOR survived relatively well by being sort of a niche product, I'm afraid that going mainstream won't do it much good in the end...
     
  5. mirimir

    mirimir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Posts:
    9,252
    CloudFront
    The major usability issue for Tor these days is websites (especially those using CloudFront) blocking all exit IPs (actually, all relay IPs). If enough Firefox users used Tor, websites couldn't get away with doing that. And for what it's worth, going mainstream (with everyone using it) has always been the goal (as I understand it, anyway).
     
  6. Veeshush

    Veeshush Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2014
    Posts:
    643
    There's still issues like https://panopticlick.eff.org/ describes, along with all the faults of the Tor button addon https://blog.torproject.org/blog/toggle-or-not-toggle-end-torbutton and the issues of running a Tor browser in your main OS (as opposed to Tails).

    Yeah, that's what I'm feeling too. Someone could argue it'll give Tor more attention and maybe people will run more exists as a result, but very few people will care enough.
     
  7. noone_particular

    noone_particular Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Posts:
    3,798
    Unless those FireFox users also become relays, I don't see it making any difference. Going mainstream is a worthwhile goal, but not by partnering with companies that track and data mine the users. Tor doesn't just make surveillance more difficult. It also interferes with tracking users, targeted ads, etc by making users all look the same. The only reason such companies would integrate with something that's harmful to their profits is to subvert it.
     
  8. mirimir

    mirimir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Posts:
    9,252
    Mozilla <> Google. Google was their major source of income for many years, but that's mostly history. Mozilla has been looking at "what's next?" for a while, so maybe this move reflects desperation. Or maybe it's a return to fundamentals.
     
  9. lotuseclat79

    lotuseclat79 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Posts:
    5,390
    In the Oct. 1, 2014 Tor Weekly News post,

    -- Tom
     
  10. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    97,410
    Location:
    U.S.A.
     
  11. mirimir

    mirimir Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2011
    Posts:
    9,252
    Promising :thumb:
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.