What is your security setup these days?

Yes, Although my wife runs for four years now with heuristics high with no FP. She hardly ever istalls software.

 

She uses "maximum heuristics"?

 

Yes

 

I have mine on the last setting currently but may switch to maximum. Thanks

 

back to ZAES

 

Desktop - DefenseWall 3.24 + Shadow Defender 1.1.0.325

Android / Smartphone - Eset Mobile Security v3

Wife's Laptop - Eset Smart Security v7

 

Desktop - W7 FW - AppGuard - Router
Laptop - W8 - SRP - W8 FW - Router

OD - Mbam

Backup - AX64 TM

But most of all, smart surfing...

 

DefenseWall v 3.24 - a rocksolid piece of a firewall.

Wsa av - v 8.0.4.115 - flyes like a butterfly and stings like a ten pound hornet.

 

Good Evening! Avira A/V Pro...AppGuard and SAS 6.0...Cookie Monster Deluxe...Lol! Sincerely...Securon

 

NOD32, Sandboxie and AppGuard.

 

Debian.

 

Who knows how many free licenses can you have associated with 1 email address for K9 Web Protection? I remember someone in here used to be a big fan of K9 and maybe can answer me this question. Thanks

dja2k

 

Where's jmonge? It's been a while. Hope he is well.

 

he may be busy . for sure

 

I am here buddy thanks for asking

 

very bussy brother but I am here and my security set still same my signiture

 

I will love to try webroot antivirus to see how it works,i will install again and see what happend

 

Thanks for the reply, j. Glad you're still kicking.

I may be doing the same with Webroot soon. MY subscription with VIPRE runs out next month some time, and I am probably going to drop them.
I have ESET and WSA licenses, so will go in one of those directions.
But no pressure, because of Sandboxie.
With Sandboxie, to my thinking, the name of the AV makes very little difference.

 

That has to be some sort of personal record.

 

You're right! I don't think I've ever seen him say that his setup is still the same.

 

I'm not sure what to make of WSA as testing ORG's are still trying to figure out how to test it fairly.

 

Granted, this is weekend so I have some more spare time to trying out EMET 5. Tested it with default settings at first and then progressively tweaked it for better security. Now I have reached a setting which I will use for quite some time, as the followings:

System wide settings
DEP = Always on
SEHOP = Always on
ASLR = App opt-in
Certificate Pinning = Disabled (I'm not using IE so WTH =| )

Additional apps configurations
All additional mitigation techniques are left to their default states. What's enabled remains enabled and what's disabled remains disabled. I was tempted to enable EAF+ and ASR in the long run, I am new to these two. But there are some additional manual configurations and I don't feel like messing around with those settings. From what I've read and I can understand in EMET's user guide they don't seem to be that important anyway. (please note that I am not suggesting anything, there are huge chances for me to make mistakes in my statements. EAF+ and ASR might have much more important roles than what I made them sound to be.)

So far I don't notice any breakages. Nice! If it really doesn't give problems anymore EMET might stay in my probably the best free security setup in the world. =V

And yes, I still think anti-exploits are overrated. Ironically, amongst all these anti-exploit hypes, EMET is rather underrated.

 

Thorough and reputable testing of Webroot SecureAnywhere is long overdue.

 

sup everybody!!

back to good old Appguard coupled with EMET 5.0 + Terabyte Image for Windows 2.91....also have another baseline backup for Drive Snapshot as well.

Bye bye realtime AV

 

Do you do anything extra like a scan of new software before setting AppGuard's Protection Level to "Install"? My current solution to having to drop AG's protection level when doing an install is also running an AV.