With LUA & SRP is Noscript necessary?

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by jdd58, Oct 16, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Boyfriend

    Boyfriend Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2010
    Posts:
    1,070
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Does NoScript have protection against man-in-middle attacks?
     
  2. moontan

    moontan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Posts:
    3,931
    Location:
    Québec
    my thoughts as well.
    i thought NoScript was very good security wise but i did not like spending time configuring it.

    i also tried disabling scripts globally in Chrome and IE and whitelisting sites case by case but i soon gave up on that.

    too much headaches. ;)
     
  3. Narxis

    Narxis Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2009
    Posts:
    477
    I use NoScript since it is available and for the first time it was hard but now its really easy to use. If a page is not working correctly i allow temporarly the main domain and this is most of the time enough. I like that it is working like AdBlock, blocks facebook and other elements on page that i hate or dont need. Still, i use Element Hiding Helper.

    Sandbox is good to, i like Google Chrome too, it has a built-in sandbox, thats nice.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.