Who here is relying on HIPS and sandboxing for this worm?

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by cheater87, Mar 31, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. cheater87

    cheater87 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2005
    Posts:
    3,291
    Location:
    Pennsylvania.
    I have Comodo Defence Plus active at the moment. Also my browsers are protected by GesWall.
     
  2. wat0114

    wat0114 Guest

    This is not a big deal at all. As long as the guidelines from this article have been followed, there should be no need to rely on any security software to ward off the Conficker. It's mostly common sense.

    Also something Wilders member Rmus posted somewhere:

    • Block TCP ports 139 and 445 at the firewall:

    "This port is used to initiate a connection with the affected component. Blocking TCP ports 139 and 445 at the firewall will help protect systems that are behind that firewall from attempts to exploit this vulnerability. We recommend that you block all unsolicited inbound communication from the Internet to help prevent attacks that may use other ports. For more information about ports, visit the following Web site."
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 31, 2009
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.