Who has suffered more

Kaspersky with the chk/dsk issue, or Eset with the very long delay of their suite. And which do you think will rebound back quicker.

 

What's the point of making a thread that's only going to get locked?

 

Why does it matter? This is a stupid thread and it will be locked as solcroft pointed out.

 

why would it be closed. It is a valid viewpoint.

 

It would be closed since absolutely nobody outside of either company has the information required to render an informed comment. Even if sales figures, trial download information, or customer retention statistics were available, you need to do a lot more digging to make a connection with the two items mentioned. Finally, it is pitting a pair of offerings on an adversarial comparison basis. It really isn't any different that "which is best", it's an alternate way of posing that precise question.

By asking which will rebound quicker, you've already posited information that you simply cannot have. The thread was initiated with an unverifiable premise. In fact, most folks internal to either of these companies won't have that information as yet (if ever) either.

Thread closed.

Blue