What is Your View of Windows 8?

Discussion in 'polls' started by Brandonn2010, Jul 5, 2013.

?

What is Your View of Windows 8?

  1. I love it!

    6 vote(s)
    7.3%
  2. I like it

    16 vote(s)
    19.5%
  3. It's okay

    11 vote(s)
    13.4%
  4. I don't like it

    29 vote(s)
    35.4%
  5. I hate it!

    20 vote(s)
    24.4%
  1. Brandonn2010

    Brandonn2010 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Posts:
    1,854
    Windows 8 has gotten so much hate, and I wanted to know, from those of you that have actually used it, what you think.

    Note: Only desktop non-touchscreen users

    In your response, please address:

    1. Stability and general buginess.

    2. Ease-of-use.

    3. Compare to XP and/or 7.

    4. Hardware support.

    5. Program support/compatibility.

    6. Anything else relevant.
     
  2. guest

    guest Guest

    It's a bloated OS just like win 7:thumbd:
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 6, 2013
  3. Osaban

    Osaban Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Posts:
    5,616
    Location:
    Milan and Seoul
    Best OS from MS so far! Of course if you don't like the new metro UI, you have a problem, but it is your problem after all. It is very fast, no blue screens in 3 months, and has an uncanny ability to pinpoint solutions to errors that its predecessors could only dream about.
    The only thing I was disappointed about is booting time: yes it boots in 12 seconds as advertised but then after seeing the desktop (or Metro should I say!) it takes about a minute to be fully functional which is even longer than Vista... What's the point to boot as fast as possible if functionality is delayed anyway...
     
    Last edited: Jul 6, 2013
  4. Gullible Jones

    Gullible Jones Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2013
    Posts:
    1,466
    I hate it. It's probably great under the hood, but the interface is just daft, to the point of making Gnome 3 look usable and intelligent.
     
  5. woomera

    woomera Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2004
    Posts:
    212
    best windows OS ever! yes! Best!
     
  6. moontan

    moontan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Posts:
    3,931
    Location:
    Québec
    i voted "I like it".

    Metro aside, on the surface, it is not much different from Win 7, which wasn't that much different from Vista itself.

    i thought the 40$ upgrade price was too good to pass up.
    i like to keep my OSes current and having the latest technology.
    within my very limited budget, of course. ;)
     
  7. ZeroDay

    ZeroDay Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2011
    Posts:
    716
    Location:
    UK
    1. Stability and general buginess. - Very stable! Best release yet!

    2. Ease-of-use. - Smooth as silk, a dream to use.

    3. Compare to XP and/or 7. - It's light years ahead of anything before it.

    4. Hardware support. - Fantastic so far I haven't had any problems.

    5. Program support/compatibility. - Again, great!

    6. Anything else relevant. I didn't like Windows 8 at first, I was definitely in the 'Haters' camp. But once I get used to it I wouldn't use any previous version of Windows. Of course that could all change if Microsoft push ads on us in 8.1. But even then I wouldn't downgrade to a previous version on Windows, It would be Linux for me. Back on topic, it's a big :thumb: from me as regards Windows 8.
     
  8. moontan

    moontan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Posts:
    3,931
    Location:
    Québec
    i think people are overreacting.
    as usual. ;)
     
  9. ZeroDay

    ZeroDay Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2011
    Posts:
    716
    Location:
    UK
    Lol. More than likely :)
     
  10. ZeroDay

    ZeroDay Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2011
    Posts:
    716
    Location:
    UK
    Off topic, but has anyone tried the Metro TVCatchup app? it's great! I can drag it to the corner of my screen and have a little TV whilst on Wilders ;)
     
  11. ance

    ance formerly: fmon

    Joined:
    May 5, 2013
    Posts:
    1,359
    I like it because it was low-priced. :D Metro GUI is nice but I don't really need it.
     
  12. TairikuOkami

    TairikuOkami Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2005
    Posts:
    3,434
    Location:
    Slovakia
    1. I get BSOD once a week (probably due to undervolting), used to be a few times a day, so it is has gotten better, presumably thanks to updates.

    2. It is much more complicated and time consuming to perform tasks, just simple opening control panel (3 sec vs 1 sec in 7), you have to aim for the corner and so on.

    3. It is a good old Windows 7 without Start, with a bothering metro and metro "features" jumping out time to time, slowing down my overall user experience.

    4.-5. No problems at all, at least nothing different from Windows 7 64-bit.

    6. I used 8 since Preview version and I have to say, that RTM was a complete disappointment (turn around), but for 40 bucks I did not really expect much.
     
  13. The Shadow

    The Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2012
    Posts:
    814
    Location:
    USA
    I gave it a few weeks and didn't much care for it. Even after getting used to Metro, I found it took me longer to do things than with 7 (so I went back to 7).
     
  14. Cruise

    Cruise Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    Posts:
    1,236
    Location:
    USA
    I'm (happily) on Win7 and after 'playing' with Win8 (on my associate's PC) I am even happier with Win7. ;)
     
    Last edited: Jul 6, 2013
  15. Wendi

    Wendi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Posts:
    643
    Location:
    USA
    I don't much care for it. Although I use W7, I have spent some time with my friend's new W8 PC. Coming from a several years old Vista PC, she just couldn't get used to working with W8's new desktop, Metro, Charms. etc. We installed StartIsBack which returned the familiar W7/Vista start menu and with that she is now able to use W8. I can see where the new user interface would work well with a touch-screen, but it leaves a lot to be desired for mouse and touch-pad use.
     
    Last edited: Jul 6, 2013
  16. pajenn

    pajenn Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Posts:
    930
    I just used it on VMware to test some software compatibility and out of curiosity. I thought it was okay. It's good in your 1-5 catagories, maybe better than W7, but I can see why people complain about metro and missing start button, so I wouldn't recommend it to others.

    Here's the thing though, if I were to buy a new laptop in the near future, I'd get one of the hybrids with a touchscreen so that it can be used as a big tablet or a regular laptop, and I'd run Windows 8 on it (plus whatever linux is recommended for hybrids).
     
  17. c2d

    c2d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Posts:
    572
    Location:
    Bosnia
    1. Stability and general buginess.

    Very stable.

    2. Ease-of-use.

    Piece of cake.

    3. Compare to XP and/or 7.

    Overall it seems faster. Boots faster and shuts down faster.Win 7 looks better imo.

    4. Hardware support.

    Brilliant

    5. Program support/compatibility.

    No probs at all.

    6. Anything else relevant.

    I absolutely adore Windows 8.
     
  18. TheKid7

    TheKid7 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2006
    Posts:
    3,576
    It is OK 'after' I installed Start8.
     
  19. mattdocs12345

    mattdocs12345 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2013
    Posts:
    1,892
    Location:
    US
    1. Stability and general buginess --> no problems so far

    2. Ease-of-use --> not very easy MS messed up on this one

    3. Compare to XP and/or 7 --> Useless metro Apps make this the most bloated OS

    4. Hardware support --> no problems so far

    5. Program support/compatibility --> no problems so far

    6. Anything else relevant --> nothing else to add
     
  20. chrisretusn

    chrisretusn Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Posts:
    1,672
    Location:
    Philippines
    I don't hate it, just don't like it.
     
  21. EASTER

    EASTER Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Posts:
    11,126
    Location:
    U.S.A. (South)
    What he said
     
  22. Mrkvonic

    Mrkvonic Linux Systems Expert

    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Posts:
    10,223
    Don't like it, it's useless.
    Mrk
     
  23. roger_m

    roger_m Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Posts:
    8,626
    I have not used it on a desktop, but all the laptops I have used it on aren't touchscreen.

    From my experience so far:

    1. I have found it to be very stable, but on one computer after only limited use, it did have an experience like Osaban where it took a while after Windows booted for everything to settle down and be usable. This is the same behaviour some users experienced on Vista without any service packs installed. But, to be fair it was an old pre Windows 7 laptop.

    2. I prefer the traditional Start Menu to the Metro interface, so in terms of ease of use I would rate Windows 7.

    3. Windows 8 runs faster for me than Windows 7, and so far I've only installed in older computers which originally came with Vista or XP.

    4. Hardware support seems to be excellent - which is to be expected, as it gets better with every Windows release. If a device works under Windows 7 then it should also work under Windows 8. I even installed a Vista audio driver on one of my laptops. Windows did install the correct Windows 8 driver, but the Vista one has Dolby virtual surround sound which I wanted to use. But it is giving some latency problems, so maybe I should switch back to the driver Windows install and see if it fares batter.

    5. I've only had one issue so far - a driver updater which claimed to support Windows 8, did not work properly. Everything else has worked fine - but to be honest I have not installed a lot of software yet.

    6. I believe it would have been better to include the Start Menu and maybe just have the Metro interface as option for tablet users - as it suits touchscreen use. Other than that I've really happy with it.
     
  24. Kerodo

    Kerodo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2004
    Posts:
    8,013
    Don't like it....
     
  25. Gullible Jones

    Gullible Jones Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2013
    Posts:
    1,466
    One other thing I should add: while using the trial version, I witnessed significant data loss following an improper shutdown - the system failed to finish booting, and had to restore itself from a VSS backup. This is the only time I have ever seen such data loss on any Windows NT version.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.