Vista tip that people might not know

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by lodore, Nov 22, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,065
    Hello,
    Today I was reading the latest custom pc Magazine and noticed a vista tip.
    The article said that at start-up on vista as default only one processor core is used.
    you can change this in MSconfig. go to the boot tab. click on advanced options. put a tick in the number of processors box. in the drop down menu select the number of processors you have. apply close all programs and reboot.
    I am guessing it will only show the amount you have. in my case 4. Boot time, loading desktop and application launch is defiantly faster.

    btw xp has the same option. msconfig,boot.ini. click on advanced options.
    tick the box next to /numproc=. select number of processors from the drop down menu. apply close all programs and reboot.
     
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2008
  2. Dark Shadow

    Dark Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    USA
    Hello lodore Nice tip indeed,when I check mine it only showed one.I changed per your instructions and Wala it made a difference for sure.now the question is why in the world would MS do these things by default, do the not want users to experience the best possiable experience.I wonder what logical reason there would be for this to default a mutil core processor to boot on single.
     
  3. ambient_88

    ambient_88 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    Posts:
    854
    That tip is a common misconception. That option in msconfig is intended specifically for programmers to test their code with a single/multiple core CPU. That way, when they only need to test their program with a single core CPU, they don't have to switch to another machine that uses a single core CPU.

    By default, Vista uses all your CPU cores at boot up.
     
  4. Dark Shadow

    Dark Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    USA
    Then why does my vista boot faster its not the imagination here I see it with my eyes.one example My nod32 splash and system tray icons load and appear super fast.
     
  5. InfinityAz

    InfinityAz Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2005
    Posts:
    828
    Location:
    Arizona
    From latest issue (holiday 2008 ) of Maximum PC:

    "...We tried the upping the setting to 2 on a dual-core system, and guess what, no change in boot time whatsoever. Turns out this is just a debug setting for coders who want to test how programs load on single-core machines without having to physically go to a less-sophisticated PC. It can be completely ignored. By default Windows uses all your cores.

    Don't do it."
     
  6. AKAJohnDoe

    AKAJohnDoe Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Posts:
    989
    Location:
    127.0.0.1
    If you research this further you will find that the dual core processors are in fact treated as a single processor for the purposes of this setting; it is intended for n-way processor configurations, that is, those with more than one physical processor chip.
     
  7. Brian K

    Brian K Imaging Specialist

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Posts:
    12,175
    Location:
    NSW, Australia
    I'd be interested is seeing actual boot times from those who noticed an improvement after changing the setting. Before and after boot times would be informative.
     
  8. rookieman

    rookieman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Posts:
    411
    Perhaps it's just me but I didn't see much of a difference.I do have a dual core and only one was ticked as said above.I'll surf for a while and do another reboot and see what happens.Would this be considered safe?
     
  9. farmerlee

    farmerlee Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Posts:
    2,585
    Makes no noticeable difference on my core 2 duo laptop, both tests ended up around 50 seconds for startup.
     
  10. AKAJohnDoe

    AKAJohnDoe Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Posts:
    989
    Location:
    127.0.0.1
    A Core 2 Duo has only one proccessor chip, although there are two on that one chip, so for the purposes of this setting you have one processor.
     
  11. dbknox

    dbknox Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Posts:
    511
    Location:
    Canada
    Didn't notice any difference here eother. ( Darn).
     
  12. Saraceno

    Saraceno Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Posts:
    2,405
    I didn't notice a difference, but once I checked the RAM (maximum memory) to be used, start-up was definitely quicker.

    See image below. Noticed a few other vista tips online that also recommended checking the RAM option - and adding your maximum RAM.
     

    Attached Files:

    • boot.jpg
      boot.jpg
      File size:
      58.4 KB
      Views:
      230
  13. rpsgc

    rpsgc Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2005
    Posts:
    312
    Location:
    Portugal
    The tip is a lie.
    (no need to keep it alive)

    /thread.
     
  14. rookieman

    rookieman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Posts:
    411
    When I tried this little tweak I didn't remember setting my max ram as shown above.Has anyone kept this setting on their computer with their ram set to max?
     
  15. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,065
    since the tip doesnt do anything thread can be closed. i thought custom pc would of done their research first.
     
  16. rookieman

    rookieman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Posts:
    411
    I have since set my pc back to the original setting.Heck it even seems snappier!
     
  17. Saraceno

    Saraceno Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Posts:
    2,405
    So it's all just nothing but snake oil? ;)

    Sometimes snake oil is good, if you think it works! :p
     
  18. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,065
    well seems it is for coders to test their apps on less cpu's than the computer has.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.