Virus Bulletin August 2011 comparative anti-virus test

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by King Grub, Aug 22, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. King Grub

    King Grub Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Posts:
    814
  2. Noob

    Noob Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    6,464
    Nice!
    Couldn't find Emsisoft on that list LOL (I mean in the image)
     
  3. sg09

    sg09 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    Posts:
    2,541
    Location:
    Kolkata, India
    OMG!!! BKIS highest in proactive and 2nd highest in reactive...:eek:
     
  4. Kernelwars

    Kernelwars Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Posts:
    2,155
    Location:
    TX
    what is BKIS sg?:doubt:
     
  5. sg09

    sg09 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    Posts:
    2,541
    Location:
    Kolkata, India
  6. King Grub

    King Grub Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Posts:
    814
  7. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Posts:
    6,269
    I am happy that ESET is stuck on the same place as usual :D

    And also as usual Trustport is at the top.

    But it's great to see that Avast, Avira, and GFI did well too. Though Webroot needs to improve a little.
    And BitDefender should have done better.
     
  8. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Posts:
    6,269
    BD of course :D Or maybe Avira. :doubt:
     
  9. shadek

    shadek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Posts:
    2,270
    Location:
    Sweden
    Is BKIS light?
    If it's BitDefender engine, then I'm afraid I'll pass. I'm hoping it's a true cloud product like Prevx is/was. Then it'd be darn light. :D
     
  10. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Posts:
    6,269
  11. shadek

    shadek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Posts:
    2,270
    Location:
    Sweden
    Yeah, I noticed that. Even on sale, it's still quite average priced and it's only for one user.
     
  12. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,599
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    It's pretty hard to avoid Bit Defender's engine these days as it is extensively licensed.
     
  13. carat

    carat Guest

    16 FP for PC Tools - well done :doubt:
     
  14. toxinon12345

    toxinon12345 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2010
    Posts:
    1,180
    Location:
    Managua, Nicaragua
    The following vendors have secured their VB100 awards in latest 5 tests:

    Sophos, ESET, QuickHeal, Central Command, BitDefender, Avira, Avast.
     
  15. eBBox

    eBBox Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Posts:
    482
    Location:
    Aalborg, Denmark
    Why this big difference between F-Secure IS and F-Secure Client Security?

    And Bitdefender doing way worse than the licensed engines in F-Secure, G-Data, and Bullguard etc.
     
  16. NAMOR

    NAMOR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Posts:
    1,526
    Location:
    Arkham Asylum

    Can't answer the first one but, F-Secure has other engines other than bitdfender, same with G-Data. And I believe that Bullguard adds their own spyware definitions to their product, so they have those as well as the bitdefender ones.
     
  17. shadek

    shadek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Posts:
    2,270
    Location:
    Sweden
    That's right. Many suites have BitDefender in them, but other in-house protection mechanisms like BB, anti-spyware etc in place!
     
  18. Brandonn2010

    Brandonn2010 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Posts:
    1,825
    Wow, AVG actually FAILED the VB certification because of 2 false positives.
     
  19. shadek

    shadek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Posts:
    2,270
    Location:
    Sweden
    Comodo is failing, as per usual. I do think their suite provides an excellent overall protection... but all this Comodo AV evangelism provided by its users needs to stop.
     
  20. GrammatonCleric

    GrammatonCleric Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Posts:
    372

    You crazy??!!! Comodo failed because this test is biased and has not shown any real life experience. Also because Reason !, Reason 2, Reason 3. Fumming capitalized reason 4. And Besides any moron would see that positive comment regarding COMODO 1, comment 2 and comment 3.
    Followed by "Only educated users use comodo".

    Sorry about that, I was channeling Melih.
     
  21. shadek

    shadek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Posts:
    2,270
    Location:
    Sweden
    Haha! That was hilarious! I thought after the first sentence that; HERE WE GO AGAIN! ANOTHER COMODO EVANGELIST! But not! :D
     
  22. kjdemuth

    kjdemuth Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Posts:
    2,957
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    Straight from BKis web page
    "Bkav Pro is particularly equipped with Safe Run, a breakthrough technology. In Safe Run mode, the system stays safe even when user unconsciously opens a virus file or a malicious website."
    Hmm doesn't kaspersky also have safe run. Hmmmm
     
  23. shadek

    shadek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Posts:
    2,270
    Location:
    Sweden
    I can't find anywhere that 'Safe run' is compatible with x64 systems. Usually, those 'Safe Runs' and 'Sandboxes' are based on 32-bit systems.
     
  24. toxinon12345

    toxinon12345 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2010
    Posts:
    1,180
    Location:
    Managua, Nicaragua
    COMODO is outstanding in the firewall side, not anti-malware.:thumbd:
     
  25. shadek

    shadek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Posts:
    2,270
    Location:
    Sweden
    I never said their firewall wasn't good. :) I just pointed out their AV. :D
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.