Very sad indeed sandboxie 3.48 cracked

Wow, anti sandboxie, virtual box, and other antis!... that makes sandboxie worthless and other security softwares...

That would be a super .exe malware.. :[

 

Don't start building your Armageddon shelter just yet. It's well known that previous pieces of malware have been able to bypass virtual apps and sandboxes, and future ones will be made to do it as well. Nothing new to see, vendors work on them as soon as they get samples.

 

Dont tell Peter.

 

Wow, that is true, dw426. Private hackers are out there and can do alot of damage.

It's the end of the internet world! D:

 

Its just my opinion, but, I think, a lot of people here are paranoid.Of course, ultimately, anyone is vulnerable.but if your sensible,then there's no need to worry your life away.Safety in numbers, there are millions of imbeciles, sat at computers.I am not worried. I am not paranoid. Sorry if this is off topic

 

yeah... but im not really paranoid... just a slight slight small fear...

 

I`m Not worried either i only run a virus scan every 15minutes and a spyware scan every 30minutes I used to be like that honest now i just run afew apps scan maybe once a month thats all now... i have taken the tin foil off my head now and now enjoy the world wide web....

 

Good God, Sly, did you ever get anything done? What on earth were you doing on the web that called for all that? Lol, I thought I was a high risk surfer, you make me look pathetic.

 

TinPie, use SRP+LUA +No Autostarts for Users --- a bulletproof** solution for protecting your system.

**Unless there is a kernel vulnerability in the OS itself -- but those are very hard to come by, and are quickly fixed.

 

Yep, using that configuration you can stare at your screensaver all day as that's about all you can do.

For real security and run anything or surf anywhere you want then use the apps in my siggy.

 

What the heck are you talking about, I run MS office, browse on the web, play movies, read papers, etc etc.

 

Well if being in screensaver mode suits you then use it.

If you see an app you want to try, let's say CCleaner, can you install it to see what it does?

 

I just open the vm, log on as administrator, then install it. If I don't like it, then I revert to recent snapshot and it hasn't touched the host system at all in the process I see what you're getting at, Franklin; it's clearly faster to do everything from an administrator account, for obvious reasons, but if one is not installing many new apps or changing system configs that often, and all their programs work fine from a standard account, then it makes more sense to run from a standard account. Of course you and several others in this forum alone do have the expertise to play safe from an admin account, but I'd not endorse it as a blanket recommendation to the masses.

 

yup its the only way to go, other crap seems like overkill, who wants to restart their machine just to test 1 app and return it to original state, I can even play with malware on VM, although I still cant find any to bypass comodo internet security though, even rootkits dont stand a chance. and the best part is comodo internet security is free!

 

I thought that there were no known samples of malware that could bypass Sandboxie?

 

No known samples in the wild have been found that can bypass Sandboxie and I think over the years there have been two obscure bypass methods both found by Buster BSA and which have been patched.

 

Those crypter settings are used only to prevent debugging/analysis in virtual environments...not to bypass them. When you execute malware crypted in this way in a virtual environment, the attack aborts (nothing happens).

 

A patched DLL can do many undesirable things in legitimate ways and never catch the eye of a malware scanner.

 

Maybe so, but the chances of this particular one being infected with something, seem to me at least, low. Also, as I mentioned in a previous post, this particular dll caused Sandboxie to not be able to start, due to this particular patched dll being a 32 bit version and I on a 64 bit system. So, unless I'm missing out on something here, that dll never really got the chance to run, therefore it SHOULDN'T have been able to do anything dastardly.

 

there are keygens and cracks all over the internet....you can`t stop those guys!for them it`s a way of living, it is fun and probably way of earning money...
here is a list found on just one crack site:
Sandboxie v3.442-CRD :: 264 Kb :: 17.04.10
Sandboxie v3.44-MESMERiZE :: 34 b :: 3.02.10
Sandboxie v3.44-MESMERiZE :: 72 Kb :: 3.02.10
Sandboxie v3.42-CRD :: 45 b :: 1.12.09
Sandboxie v3.40-CRD :: 45 b :: 30.09.09
Sandboxie v3.38-CRD :: 45 b :: 28.05.09
Sandboxie v3.36.04-CRD :: 45 b :: 27.04.09
Sandboxie v3.36-CRD :: 45 b :: 13.04.09
Sandboxie v3.42-CRD :: 264 Kb :: 1.12.09
Sandboxie v3.40-CRD :: 344 Kb :: 30.09.09
Sandboxie v3.38-CRD :: 344 Kb :: 28.05.09
Sandboxie v3.36.04-CRD :: 344 Kb :: 27.04.09
Sandboxie v3.36-CRD :: 344 Kb :: 13.04.09
Sandboxie v3.32 :: 45 b :: 16.11.08
Sandboxie v3.30 :: 45 b :: 2.09.08
Sandboxie v3.34 :: 33 Kb :: 5.01.09
Sandboxie v3.32 :: 85 Kb :: 16.11.08
Sandboxie v3.30 :: 26 Kb :: 2.09.08
Sandboxie v3.28 KeyMaker :: 43 b :: 30.06.08
Sandboxie v3.28 KeyMaker :: 61 Kb :: 30.06.08
Sandboxie v3.25.02 KeyMaker :: 45 b :: 7.04.08
Sandboxie v3.26 :: 33 Kb :: 27.04.08
Sandboxie v3.25.02 KeyMaker :: 61 Kb :: 7.04.08
Sandboxie v3.22 :: 33 Kb :: 9.02.08
Sandboxie v3.02 :: 43 b :: 19.10.07
Sandboxie v3.01 :: 45 b :: 15.09.07
Sandboxie v3.00.09 :: 45 b :: 31.07.07
Sandboxie v3.21 :: 33 Kb :: 7.12.07
Sandboxie v3.02 :: 33 Kb :: 19.10.07
Sandboxie v3.01 :: 26 Kb :: 15.09.07
Sandboxie v3.00.09 :: 33 Kb :: 31.07.07
Sandboxie 2.62 :: 35 Kb :: 20.10.06
Sandboxie v2.25 :: 3 Kb :: 6.03.06
Sandboxie v2.25 :: 4 Kb :: 6.03.06

 

True, I wasn't thinking of the digital signature. Either way, the dll failed here, so no infection for me

 

Per tzuk (Your Comments About Version 3.49)...

 

Alrighty, learn something new every day I do, lol. Either way it failed on this system, so I'm assuming the DLL never got a chance to do anything dirty, if there was indeed anything malicious about it.

 

I sent it to one of the anti-virus labs they checked it and said the file is not infected it`s clean ??

 

I don't consider VT a "virus lab" myself, but that's neither here nor there. Having VT, Avast, Hitman Pro and Prevx all say it's clean, to me means it's clean. I'm sure the numerous others who downloaded it likely have a variety of AV/AM scanners, so if no one is reporting it infected at the place you came across it, then it's safe in my eyes. That's not really the point of the thread though, the point is, what the majority of us knew would happen, has happened and will keep happening.