Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by abu shofwan, May 3, 2012.
Where Norton ?
Thanks for the link !
I'm a little confused - could someone explain what the number 100 signifies? Surely not all those products acheived 100%, unless the sample size was so small / old?
No webroot. Ikarus passes, Emsisoft fails.
VB RAP test results Oct 2011 - April 2012
weired test result
why Returnil is Fail while Fsecure is a Win
very Diffrent result for the same engine i think ?
i don't get it too. why would i need to see a result that says every product is 100%?
Re: VB RAP test results Oct 2011 - April 2012
what happened to unthreat!
Check the graph! Under VB100...select latest comparative:
Merged Threads to Continue Related Topic.
Returnil uses the F-Prot engine from Frisk
looks like everyone did well in this. Cannot find norton.
Also trustport and F-Secure failed, thats something new.
One (1) False positive and Emsisoft fails.
Yet they allow and pass antiviruses which allow their host to become infected with malicious programs they don't deem to be "In the Wild".
What is the logic in that? I'd rather have a antivirus that notifies me of suspicious programs, allowing me to investigate further, rather than an antivirus that happily allows an infection.
Maybe Norton is becoming the new Dr. Web. That means a withdrawal from testing. AV_C, VB, a trend?
Separate names with a comma.