Upgrade available November 17th

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by ronjor, Nov 14, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 3 of 3
  1. EnGenie

    EnGenie Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2004
    Posts:
    182
    Location:
    Hampshire, England
    Details of the new features are available here

    :D
     
    EnGenie, Nov 17, 2006
    #51
  2. supra_51

    supra_51 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2006
    Posts:
    3
    Any one else having trouble installing the trial version of nod32 downloaded from http://www.eset.com/download/index.php
    It gives an error of "Unexpected end of archive" when I try to install it.
     
    supra_51, Nov 17, 2006
    #52
  3. rseiler

    rseiler Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    90
    Curious: The registered site (both servers) seems to have corrupt copies of 2.7. Tried to open it in WinRAR: The file "? ? ?" header is corrupt.
     
    rseiler, Nov 17, 2006
    #53
  4. huntnyc

    huntnyc Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2004
    Posts:
    1,014
    Location:
    Brooklyn, USA
    Confirmed on roblem when opening 2.7 exe file with WinRAR. Now, what does this mean and what should we do?

    Gary
     
    huntnyc, Nov 17, 2006
    #54
  5. supra_51

    supra_51 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2006
    Posts:
    3
    looks like they have now removed the 2.7 trial version from download.
    It now has version 2.5 if you re-download it.
     
    supra_51, Nov 17, 2006
    #55
  6. rseiler

    rseiler Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    90
    Good find, since the News section linked to the support FAQ for more information about 2.7, and that FAQ had absolutely nothing to say about 2.7. Between that and corrupt copies of 2.7, I think Eset was trying to get home early for the weekend.
     
    rseiler, Nov 17, 2006
    #56
  7. FanJ

    FanJ Updates Team

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    4,660
    Could we please verify the MD5 checksum ?

    For XP, after just having downloaded it (licenced user):
    The file ndntenst.exe has the following Checksum(s)
    MD5 - 07B2A0D953200A6AECF84B4357A8A03F
     
    FanJ, Nov 17, 2006
    #57
  8. Tommy

    Tommy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Posts:
    1,169
    Location:
    Buenos Aires - Munic
    Confirmed: 07B2A0D953200A6AECF84B4357A8A03F
    Installed and running :thumb:
     
    Tommy, Nov 17, 2006
    #58
  9. supra_51

    supra_51 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2006
    Posts:
    3
    re-download the file. The problem has now been fixed.
     
    supra_51, Nov 17, 2006
    #59
  10. huntnyc

    huntnyc Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2004
    Posts:
    1,014
    Location:
    Brooklyn, USA
    Still same problem after just downloading agian. Will try again.

    Gary
     
    huntnyc, Nov 17, 2006
    #60
  11. huntnyc

    huntnyc Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2004
    Posts:
    1,014
    Location:
    Brooklyn, USA
    Downloaded the file 3 more time but still WinRAR says file headeer is corrupt. I have already installed before I knew this and have not noticed any problems. But, should it be this way with that WinRAR error when opening this installer file? Thanks.

    Gary
     
    huntnyc, Nov 17, 2006
    #61
  12. Supersnake

    Supersnake Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2003
    Posts:
    121
    Installed 2.7 Final over 2.7 beta:Can I leave it this way?

    Have installed the 2.7 gold over the 2.7 beta. Am pleased to see that it retained all the settings which saved alot of work for me. However, I am now wondering if I should have first uninstalled the beta before installing the gold.

    Anyone one with a definitive answer on this? I don't want to have any undesired beta remnants in the mix.

    Thanks.


    EDIT: Found the following advice that Agoretsky posted so I uninstalled the beta and manually made my settings match what I had before. Was a bit tedious but I now have the peace of mind.

    You do not need to download the release candidate if you do not wish to, however, it is strongly recommended you uninstall the beta test version before upgrading to the production version when it is released.- agoretsky


    .
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2006
    Supersnake, Nov 18, 2006
    #62
  13. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    164,170
    Location:
    Texas
    ronjor, Nov 18, 2006
    #63
Page 3 of 3
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...