Update: CCleaner v3.10.1525 (Aug 25, 2011)

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by prius04, Aug 25, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. prius04

    prius04 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Posts:
    1,248
    Location:
    USA
    CCleaner Updated: v3.10.1525 (25 Aug 2011)

    - Added Firefox 7.0 Beta support.
    - Added Firefox 6.0 Final support.
    - Added IE 9.0.2 support.
    - Added Safari 5.1 binarycookies file cleaning and management.
    - Added cleaning for MS Search, Cached Fonts, RegEditX,
    SpeedBit DAP, Spyware Terminator, SUPERAntiSpyware,
    Acrobat Distiller 10 and Foxit Reader 5.0.
    - Improved cleaning for Internet Download Accelerator.
    - Improved Opera 9 Last Download Location cleaning.
    - Improved accuracy and reliability for free space and entire drive wiping.
    - Improved Safari local storage cleaning.
    - Improved Google Chrome "Saved Form Information" and "Saved Passwords" cleaning.
    - Updated various translations.
    - Minor optimization tweaks.


    Download: http://www.piriform.com/ccleaner/builds
    (Regular and Portable builds available at this time)
     
  2. Trooper

    Trooper Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Posts:
    5,507
    Thanks for the heads up!
     
  3. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Posts:
    9,146
    Ninite updated it for me :D
     
  4. ExtremeGamerBR

    ExtremeGamerBR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Posts:
    1,350
    Thanks for update!
     
  5. acuariano

    acuariano Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Posts:
    786
    no slim version yet
     
  6. PJC

    PJC Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Posts:
    2,959
    Location:
    Internet
    CCleaner 3.10.1525 (Aug 25, 2011)

    It will be available sooner or later...Be patient for a few days...;)
     
  7. 1chaoticadult

    1chaoticadult Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Posts:
    2,342
    Location:
    USA
    Re: CCleaner 3.10.1525 (Aug 25, 2011)

    Thanks for the update
     
  8. Dark Shadow

    Dark Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    USA
    Thanks for the update.
     
  9. LoneWolf

    LoneWolf Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Posts:
    3,784
    I wonder why improvement on Opera 9 o_O The latest stable is 11.50.
     
  10. FanJ

    FanJ Updates Team

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    4,657
  11. m00nbl00d

    m00nbl00d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Posts:
    6,623
    Is it me or CCleaner is becoming less effective?

    For quite sometime I've been reading quite a few PDFs, watching some videos. For learning purposes.

    When I finish reading and watching, I open CCleaner to clean any junk. I then run Javacool MRU-Blaster and it always finds all the stuff in the MRU list.

    I'm going to give BleachBit a try and see how it fairs. I seriously am not liking the path CCleaner is taking. :(
     
  12. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Posts:
    6,429
    IDK really, but since the last two releases they seems to have changed the way CCleaner displays the amount of data it has cleared.

    3 releases ago it used to clean around 80MB, but now it never goes above 6MB.
    No matter where I browse, for how long, it never goes above 6MB :doubt:

    And I haven't asked why since all the data is gone anyway even if it displays 6MB!
     
  13. Noob

    Noob Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    6,491
    Never really pay attention to how much it cleans but right now with a scan it said 399MB
     
  14. Page42

    Page42 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Posts:
    6,942
    Location:
    USA
    I've noticed that it takes a very long time to clean Chrome internet cache... like 4 minutes, sometimes longer. Often it is between 80-280 mb worth, but it shouldn't take so long. :(
     
  15. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Posts:
    6,429
    Wow that's a looong time indeed. Do you run CC everyday? Though even if you don't that's way too long :gack:
     
  16. Page42

    Page42 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Posts:
    6,942
    Location:
    USA
    Tell me about it.
    Yep, I run it everyday... every time I close a browsing session.
    I use secure deletion (supposed to be slower, I know) but only 1 pass overwrite.
    I know for a fact that CC never took this long with IE8.
    To me, it seems to be a Chrome thing with CC.
    Not good, for sure.
     
  17. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Posts:
    6,429
    But I use that too. Supposed to be slower yes but not that slow I think. :D

    Well since I don't have Chrome installed I can't compare, but it would be good if some members that use Chrome could say their cleaning times as well.

    FYI my cleaning time when I have browsed with either Safari or IE8 is at Max 20 Sec, but usually around 3-10 Sec.
     
    Last edited: Sep 5, 2011
  18. m00nbl00d

    m00nbl00d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2009
    Posts:
    6,623
    Another thing that I've noticed is that, sometimes when I check for any junk to be cleaned, CC says there's nothing to clean (something like that), but I press "Run CCleaner" anyway. It shows that some files were cleaned... o_O o_O

    This is not something that happens with the new version. It has been happening for quite some time now.

    I see that they now have a paid Home version. I would never buy such a buggy product.

    CCleaner used to be great, but it lost quality. :( I wonder what happened/what's happening with its development.
     
  19. Page42

    Page42 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Posts:
    6,942
    Location:
    USA
    Please tell us what you think of BleachBit.
    I am not familiar with it, but may need to look elsewhere due to this CC slowdown (if I can't determine the cause).
    :)
     
  20. atomomega

    atomomega Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Posts:
    1,290
    This is what I do (using Chrome/IE)
    After ending my browsing session and before closing the browser, I run the built-in cleaner and then I run CCleaner, it takes no more than 40 secs, and usually takes care of around 6MB.
    This happens to me too from time to time... o_O

    But, really, does anybody can really tell how effectively it cleans? Like, what can you compare it against? I still find it reliable. The other one I've used is the one that comes with IObit's ASC, it also reported remainings after running CCleaner, so who knows... :doubt:
     
  21. ichito

    ichito Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2011
    Posts:
    1,997
    Location:
    Poland - Cracow
    I noticed that CCleaner works (analysis and cleaning) a bit longer on Win7 than WinXP. Maybe that is the reason? On XP the newest version works the same as an older...very fast :)
     
  22. PJC

    PJC Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Posts:
    2,959
    Location:
    Internet
    CCleaner 3.10.1525 SLIM version

    Got it thanks! :thumb:
    CCleaner Slim and CCEnhancer are great Free Apps! :thumb:
     
  23. dw426

    dw426 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Posts:
    5,543
    After trying it myself, Bleachbit is a bit faster at cleaning than CCleaner. The interface is much simpler, and it is explained what the options are (though "DeepScan" is lacking). It has support for up to 500 extra cleaners, so that's pretty sweet. The one thing against it, is that it's a bit more difficult to wade through the results. There are no separate sections for the registry and the rest, like there is in CC. Instead, it's all lumped into one giant list.

    Registry cleaning, depending on how you look at it, is lacking. For me, it did not search out old keys from programs no longer installed. Instead, it focused on cleaning up things that, to me at least, matter like thumbnail cache, memory dumps, old Windows update installs, browsers (the Firefox cleaner is very thorough) and such. There weren't any random "obsolete entry" detections that could or could not cause problems if messed with.

    Overall, I like it. It keeps cleaning to the simple things, it's just as easy to use as CCleaner and, in my opinion, safer to use for the regular folks (who probably ought not to be using either program :D ).
     
  24. Trooper

    Trooper Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Posts:
    5,507
    I remember trying Bleachbit once. Prevx flagged it as malware lol.
     
  25. mrpink

    mrpink Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2010
    Posts:
    407
    Prevx flags everything as malware lol
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.