Trojan Faceoff 2006

I don't know if it was mentioned on Wilders also as the test is from June 2006.

Further Informations

 

Tommy
Thanks fro popping this up
That site has some interesting projects !

Not really happy results for any vendors AFAICS.
Not happy to see BOClean's results.

No comments here from any vendors.
I dont think anyone likes these results.

 

I am also supriced ther is any reaction to this test. Think you listed the reasons.

 

Hello

What do the green check marks mean in the tests?

Would THEMIDA protect current security programs you have installed?
What is the English price for THEMIDA ?

controler

 

At the top of the page you find explanations of all checkmarks etc.

Themida 1.8.0.0 arround U$S 149 - 188 depending on the Licenz you want.
http://www.oreans.com/pricing.php

 

yes I was looking at the explanations of what the symbols mean but when i look I see for instance BoClean with 5 green check marks and no percentage for assasin
I see Dr Web with 5 green check marks for Optix and only a 89.4 %. does green check marks mean bad?

controler

 

The numbers and checks are unrelated, as described in the key.

Blue

 

No, green mark is good.
The porcentage only reflects the average pass rates for the last two years (August 2004 - August 2006) at Virus Bulletin and AV-Comparitives. IMHO if there is no %, means, that the applications has not been tested there or not sufficient informations/tests.

 

Does P+T mean Process Explorer was packeg and protected by THEMIDA?

If so why should a security program detect Process Explorer? Or are you saying the security program should detect the packer? BoClean only detects when unpacked in mem. Now I am confused again.

controler

 

Wouldn't flex hex be better or are you talking about the resource editor?

 

Anybody else see this erro while using THEMIDA?

 

Clicking on the popup give the error.

 

Damn I am starting to feel lonley

Doesn't anyone want to post after me anymore?


con

 

These results are interesting.
Looks like most of the programs stunk it up badly!

I see this by a lot of the programs listed on that test

If this is a credible test there aren't too many dependable av and at programs.
I can understand Tauscan's poor performnace,but Kaspersky failing half?

 

@The Tester: yyeess, hhmm, bit of a wake-up!

@ Controler: lol con, not like you: you have tooomannyycofffeeess last night or not enough?

PE is not process explorer: packer and revers engineering tool:
http://www.heaventools.com/

Each virus stipulated in the test was packed in various ways then let loose.

I would have thought/hoped that BOClean would pick up if not the packed versions at least when they ran?

The test does not seem to specify if there was a reboot and wether any trojans were picked up when attempting to "go off" with the reboot or am I missing something?

Interesting in that the tester has actually made an effort to include BOClean when many dont